Skip to main content

1-20 of 129 results for subject:Disqualification

Member X
Jack Straw

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Straw, Jack (129)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

No, they are saying that the person is not guilty, according to the criminal law. As happens very often in employment law, an acquittal will not exempt the individual from appropriate proceedings under employment legislation and the contract of their employment, because the standard of proof is lower, as everyone...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c52-3
House
House of Commons

There are a lot of new clauses and new schedules in this group, but on this occasion I have a better explanation for that than is often the case, and it is as follows. The Committee will recall—in technicolour—how important it was for us to reach agreement before the summer...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c48-9
House
House of Commons

May I thank all right hon. and hon. Members who have contributed to this important debate. I hope that its conclusion on Report will be provisions in the Parliamentary Standards Act as amended that will ensure that the new system of parliamentary pay, allowances and pensions command the respect of...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c79-80
House
House of Commons

Point taken. One of the amendments would remove the sunset clause, which I never wanted in the first place, so I am delighted to recommend it. I do not think that that will require further amendment.

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c57
House
House of Commons

I have had the benefit of being in the Chamber for the whole debate and I do not think that there has been any personal criticism of members of the Fees Office. Everybody understands that a system that was not fit for purpose developed and that officials in the Fees...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c81
House
House of Commons

Non-taxable?

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c75
House
House of Commons

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c65
House
House of Commons

I will not invite you to declare an interest from the Chair in this matter, Mr. Gale, although I could. The provision is perfectly innocent. There is one class of Member—we are all elected as Members of Parliament. However, as the hon. Gentleman will recognise, some time ago the House...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c67
House
House of Commons

No part of the new clause states that there is a first class of Member, which is Labour and Conservative Members, a second class of Scottish and Welsh nationalists and anybody else, and then a third class, well below the salt, of Liberal Democrats. Attractive though that may be, it...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c67
House
House of Commons

The role of the parliamentary commissioner is to enforce the various codes—Standing Orders—that the House has established to deal with, for example, declarations of interest. That is the most obvious example, but included in that would also be examples of advocacy in the House—cases where somebody has been taking money...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c49-50
House
House of Commons

It is subject to any advice that we get from those at the Table, but the responsibilities of the John Lyon figure and the Standards and Privileges Committee are entirely a matter for the House, full stop. These changes do not deal with that. What is in the tin will...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c50
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c47
House
House of Commons

Colleagues will know—it is a well-trodden path—that if someone was convicted of a serious offence, they would normally come within the automatic disqualification. Let us say that the penalty imposed by the criminal courts was less than the 12 months in prison that would require automatic disqualification. Let us say...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c52
House
House of Commons

I did not do badly. The right hon. Gentleman used to represent Ealing; that is the problem.

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c51
House
House of Commons

I will give way in one second. Various suggestions were made informally, including that we could perhaps ask the Judicial Appointments Commission to appoint the compliance officer. I should say, given that I am responsible at arm's length for the Judicial Appointments Commission and have a role in the appointment...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c50-1
House
House of Commons

Day by day, those responsibilities will not overlap, but there must be the overlap that I am describing. I think that the Committee accepts that. Without that overlap, the system could be subject to outrageous abuse. That is unlikely, given what the House and Members, whether they have transgressed or...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c51-2
House
House of Commons

I am not quite as old as the right hon. Gentleman, but I am getting on that way. The terms of new clause 87 are linked to concerns about how even-handed the compliance officer and the appeal system will be. Many colleagues have raised questions informally with me, as I...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c51
House
House of Commons

It is not our intention to do that. I cannot be absolutely certain that the wording does not take it further—that is why we are actively examining the matter. We will consult very quickly and come back with modifications, which I hope will accommodate the Committee's wishes.

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c56
House
House of Commons

I cannot say precisely what discussions took place with the trustees. However, I can tell the right hon. Gentleman about conversations that I have had, particularly with my right hon. Friend the Member for Islwyn (Mr. Touhig), on behalf of the chairman of the trustees, who is currently indisposed through...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c56
House
House of Commons

I accept entirely the burden of what the hon. Gentleman says. The issue is how to achieve that. Let us suppose that in such a case, the authority says, "We shouldn't have agreed this amount for training or for cleaning," and the Member says, "Sorry, but you did, and I...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
505 c54-5
House
House of Commons