Skip to main content

1-20 of 20 results for subject:"Information Commissioner's Office"

Member X
Baroness Stowell of Beeston

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Stowell of Beeston, Baroness (20)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I apologise to the Minister for intervening on her when I have not spoken earlier in this debate, but I was reassured by what she just said on Amendment 162. Remarks made by other noble Lords in this debate suggest both that members of the public might not object to...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2024
Reference
842 c25GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if the Committee will indulge me, I was a little late arriving for the introduction to this group of amendments by my noble friend Lord Lucas, but I heard most of what he said and I will speak briefly. I am quite sympathetic to the arguments about the...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2024
Reference
837 cc426-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly to support the amendments in the name of my noble friend Lady Harding and the others in this group. She has comprehensively explained their importance; they may not be philosophical, as she says, but they have practical importance. One of the most compelling reasons for...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2024
Reference
837 cc136-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the noble Lords, Lord Stevenson and Lord Clement-Jones, have already said, the Communications and Digital Select Committee did indeed recommend a new Joint Committee of both Houses to look specifically at the various different aspects of Ofcom’s implementation of what will be the Online Safety Act and...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2023
Reference
831 cc2349-2350
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I added my name to some amendments on this issue in Committee. I have not done so on Report, not least because I have been so occupied with other things and have not had the time to focus on this. However, I remain concerned about this part of...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2023
Reference
831 cc2373-4
House
House of Lords

Just to be clear, am I right to understand my noble friend as saying that there is currently no technology that would be technically acceptable for tech companies to do what is being asked of them? Did he say that tech companies should be looking to develop the technology to...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2023
Reference
831 c2377
House
House of Lords

My Rt Hon. Friend the Prime Minister has made the following statement to the House of Commons:


This written ministerial statement confirms that policy responsibility for data protection policy, sponsorship of the Information Commissioner’s Office, and sponsorship of The National Archives will transfer from the Ministry of Justice to the Department...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Department
Leader of the House of Lords
Type
Written statements
Date
17 September 2015
Reference
HLWS205
House
House of Lords

I simply point out to the noble Lord that my understanding is that, although a local authority may contract out a service to a provider, the local authority is still accountable for the delivery of that service. Therefore, any individual should be able to request—using the Freedom of Information Act...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2012
Reference
734 c34GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Wills, for introducing and explaining his amendment, and also for the supplementary comments from the noble Lord, Lord Rosser. I am not going to apologise for the fact that this Government are carrying out post-legislative scrutiny of the Freedom of...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2012
Reference
734 c32-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as my noble friend has already made clear this afternoon the Government are very committed to greater transparency and to making sure that the Freedom of Information Act introduced by the previous Administration operates as effectively as possible. That is behind our commitment to introduce post-legislative scrutiny of...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2012
Reference
734 c28-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Wills, for explaining his amendments so clearly. I will not attempt to summarise them and take up the Committee’s time unnecessarily. I agree with the sentiment behind the noble Lord’s amendments in relation to the timeliness of public interest deliberations...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2012
Reference
734 c52-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want first to congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Soley, on his staying power this afternoon. Beyond myself and my noble friend he is one of the few Members who has been with us throughout the proceedings and it has been very nice to see him here. On...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2012
Reference
734 c59GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall also speak to the other amendments in the group. This final group contains various minor amendments, a number of which are consequential on other government amendments agreed during the Committee of the whole House. I will be happy to provide further details if necessary, but subject...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2012
Reference
734 c68GC
House
House of Lords

153: Schedule 9, page 167, line 9, leave out ““, 21 and 23”” and insert ““and 21 to 23””

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2012
Reference
734 c68GC
House
House of Lords

154: Schedule 9, page 167, line 11, leave out sub-paragraph (3) 155: Schedule 9, page 170, line 4, at end insert— ““After section 81(8) (general interpretation) insert— ““(9) References in this Act to provision which, if it were contained in an Act of the Northern Ireland Assembly, would deal with...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2012
Reference
734 c68-70GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken in this debate. I agree that any person guilty of an offence of altering or destroying information that has been requested under the Freedom of Information Act should be prosecuted, and they should not be able to evade...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2012
Reference
734 c49-50GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall start by picking up where the noble Lord, Lord Tunnicliffe, left off, and by making the point that there is a lot of support for CCTV in this country. As my noble friend has already made clear today, the Government are certainly not in any way...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2011
Reference
733 c311-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I would be very happy to take away the points that my noble friend has raised and will, of course, write to him in due course.

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2011
Reference
733 c308GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was just about to say to my noble friend that I know that he was not talking about speed camera technology at all. It was just for the benefit of the rest of the Committee. I thought it was an appropriate point for me to make that...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2011
Reference
733 c307-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend for explaining and introducing his amendments. I recognise that he is focusing on the specific use of surveillance camera technology, particularly in its use for enforcement of parking and traffic regulations. It is probably worth me pointing out for the benefit...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2011
Reference
733 c306-7GC
House
House of Lords