Skip to main content

1-9 of 9 results for subject:Scotland

Member X
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara
Subject X
Property transfer

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Stevenson of Balmacara, Lord (9)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Property transfer (9)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I add my welcome to the noble Baroness in her first substantive outing as a Minister. Of course, we have

had many exchanges across the Dispatch Boxes on other Bills, where she occupied a more junior position, but now she is free to fly her own route on...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2017
Reference
783 cc937-942
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we support the amendment of my noble friend Lady Hayter. I thank all the other noble Lords—noble friends in particular—who have spoken on this topic. I declare an interest. I was, like many noble Lords in the Chamber today, involved at some point with the National Consumer Council....

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2011
Reference
726 c786-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the purpose of this amendment is to ensure that the proceeds of any sale of Royal Mail are invested in the post office network and the delivery of the universal postal service. In our debate in this House at Second Reading, the Minister explained what would happen to...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c63-4
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her response, which is rather depressing in its rejection of our proposal. My reference to the pension deficit fund dealt with the assets. Tagged on to the end of that discussion was a comment that, in return for obtaining the assets, the Government were also...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c65-6
House
House of Lords

12: Clause 2, page 2, line 3, at end insert— ““( ) that the receipts of the sale will be used exclusively for the purpose of investment in the Post Office network of branches and future investment in the delivery of the universal postal service by a Royal Mail company...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c63
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the amendment in the name of my noble friend Lord Whitty. A couple of noble Lords have suggested that these discussions, particularly in relation to the assets, are putting carts before horses but I am not sure about that. We are really talking about the transfer...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c71-2
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that response. We seem to be placing a great deal of stress on hopes and aspirations about what will happen after the sale—other noble Lords picked up on this, I think—and very little on what many people in the country would regard as sensible and...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c108-9
House
House of Lords

15: Clause 2, page 2, line 12, leave out subsection (5) and insert— ““( ) In order to ensure that it remains a single company, for the purpose of this Part ““Royal Mail company”” means the company that provides the universal postal service.””

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c106
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thought that, following that interruption, we should have a few seconds of silence to gather our thoughts in case we are interrupted. This amendment restricts the issue or transfer of shares in Royal Mail to the whole company by defining a ““Royal Mail company”” as the company...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c106-8
House
House of Lords