Skip to main content

1-9 of 9 results for subject:VAT

Member X
Bob Spink
Subject X
Trade competitiveness

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Spink, Bob (9)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Trade competitiveness (9)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Does the right hon. Gentleman think that one problem with the Liberal amendment is that it would prevent any decrease in, or indeed the removal of, the escalator over the next three years?

Member
Bob Spink (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2009
Reference
492 c791
House
House of Commons

No. The hon. Gentleman walked into the Chamber just two minutes ago, although the debate has been going on for 90 minutes, so I will not give way to him. I think the public finances will be in better shape because of the Government's fiscal stimulus, and I think the...

Member
Bob Spink (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2009
Reference
492 c766
House
House of Commons

This debate is about whether one is a tax cutter or not. I am a tax cutter, unlike the official Opposition, who support the Liberals' amendment. I oppose the amendment because I am an unashamed tax cutter. I honestly believe that cutting tax is the best way to stimulate economic...

Member
Bob Spink (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2009
Reference
492 c766
House
House of Commons

No, I will not. [Interruption.]

Member
Bob Spink (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2009
Reference
492 c766
House
House of Commons

Local authorities, of course, could reduce the council tax as a result of having collected more money from parking charges and so on. Does the hon. Gentleman have any idea which tax his party would reduce to balance out the 2.5 per cent. VAT increase that it wants? Alternatively, would...

Member
Bob Spink (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2009
Reference
492 c746
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to you, Sir Michael. Does the Economic Secretary agree that cutting taxes was perhaps the most effective fiscal stimulus, that tax cuts stimulate demand, and that the tax cut is working rather well? Will he therefore put back to 1 June the date of the changeover from...

Member
Bob Spink (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2009
Reference
492 c766-7
House
House of Commons

No. The hon. Gentleman has just walked into the Chamber.

Member
Bob Spink (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2009
Reference
492 c766
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman disagrees with some well respected Conservative Front Benchers, who felt that cutting VAT was the best fiscal stimulus possible and said so quite openly. When the Minister winds up, will he say what he thinks the consequences for public finances and jobs would be if the fiscal...

Member
Bob Spink (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2009
Reference
492 c766
House
House of Commons

Is there not a case for pushing the date back rather than bringing it forward—perhaps to 1 June, which might have electoral as well as commercial benefits?

Member
Bob Spink (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2009
Reference
492 c758
House
House of Commons