Skip to main content

1-15 of 15 results for subject:Partnerships

Member X
Lord Rosser

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Rosser, Lord (15)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

moved Amendment No. 58: 58: Clause 37, page 33, line 35, at end insert— ““( ) Before issuing or modifying any guidance under this section the appropriate national authority must consult— (a) any local transport authority that may be affected by the guidance; and (b) such other persons as the...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c146-7GC
House
House of Lords

As my noble friend has said that he will take the issue away and look further at it—although I appreciate that that is without making any commitments—I am happy to beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 60 not moved.] Clause 38 agreed to. Clause...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c157GC
House
House of Lords

Before—

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c127GC
House
House of Lords

I will read our proceedings in Hansard to check, but I am not sure that I laboured the point of compensation in my contribution.

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c137GC
House
House of Lords

My noble friend said that he will respond to the questions that he has not covered in his response—there may be one or two. I will obviously look forward to receiving those responses. There is a fundamental disagreement between us. I think that the processes will put people off the...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c137-8GC
House
House of Lords

I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 25 agreed to. Clauses 26 and 27 agreed to. Clause 28 [Extension of maximum period of quality contracts]: [Amendment No. 50 not moved.] Clause 28 agreed to. Clause 29 [Continuation of scheme for further period]: [Amendments Nos. 51...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c146GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 59: 59: Clause 38, page 34, leave out lines 4 to 13 and insert— ““(1) Where subsection (2) applies, the cessation of the provision of local services to which a quality contract relates by one person and the commencement of the provision of those services by another...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c149-53GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 61: 61: Schedule 2, page 90, line 30, at end insert— ““(4) After sub-paragraph (3)(c) insert— ““(d) securing improvements in the quality, capacity, usability or variety of transport provision within the area of the authority of benefit to actual or potential transport users within the area generally...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c159-60GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 24: 24: Clause 18, page 17, line 23, leave out ““proposed”” The noble Lord said: I should like to continue the debate on quality contracts now rather than wait for Report stage. Amendment No. 24 would fundamentally change the Bill so that the local transport authority is...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c121-5GC
House
House of Lords

That is an incorrect statement. All my questions were addressed to my noble friend who will be responding to the debate; none of my questions were addressed to the noble Lord, Lord Snape.

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c127GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 49: 49: Clause 25, page 25, line 18, leave out subsection (6) and insert— ““(6) In subsection (2), for paragraph (c) (maximum period for which scheme to remain in operation) substitute— ““(c) that the scheme is to remain in operation until such time as the authority or...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c143-4GC
House
House of Lords

I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 25 to 33 not moved.] Clause 18 agreed to. Clause 19 [Notice and consultation requirements]: [Amendments Nos. 34 to 36 not moved.]

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c139GC
House
House of Lords

In the light of that response, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 37 agreed to. Clause 38 [Quality contracts: application of TUPE]:

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c149GC
House
House of Lords

I want to ensure that I have understood the point that has been made. On the second amendment, I think that my noble friend is saying that the Community legislation would not apply in the circumstances of the bus contract. I took his reply to mean that he drew a...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c145GC
House
House of Lords

I note my noble friend's statement that he believes that what I seek to achieve through the amendments is already covered in the Bill. I am not sure that I necessarily agree with that, but my noble friend has put that on the record, and I beg leave to withdraw...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c161GC
House
House of Lords