Skip to main content

1-20 of 29 results for subject:Devolution

Member X
Lord Redwood
Subject X
Environment protection

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Redwood, Lord (29)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Environment protection (29)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

rose—

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2023
Reference
738 c204
House
House of Commons

First, I wish to address the question of housing supply in the national planning policy framework, amendment 44 and others. I support the Government in rejecting the Lords amendments—in most cases, those amendments make the Bill worse—but we need greater clarity from the Government about how the national planning policy...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2023
Reference
738 cc216-8
House
House of Commons

Given the Minister’s enthusiasm for devolution and the wish to spread investment more sensibly around the country, what extra powers will local communities have to decide what is a realistic number of new homes in any given area?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2023
Reference
738 c184
House
House of Commons

Why did the people of the north-east turn down Labour’s policy of elected regional government, and why did Labour not try it anywhere else?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2022
Reference
715 c842
House
House of Commons

I am pleased that the Secretary of State believes in more devolution. How much extra devolved power will our councils get to settle the very important issue of how much housing investment we should welcome?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2022
Reference
715 c822
House
House of Commons

In Wokingham, there are thousands of permissions outstanding to build new homes, and thousands of new homes have been built in recent years. We do not need or want Government inspectors determining in favour of yet more homes on greenfield sites that are outside our local plan area.

I am pleased...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2022
Reference
715 cc864-5
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister confirm that Brexit is a huge opportunity to increase the powers both of this House—over our own internal market and economic prosperity—and of the devolved Administrations, which will gain power? Should everybody not cheer up and welcome the fact that both the devolved Administrations and the Union...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 September 2020
Reference
681 c192
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 September 2020
Reference
681 c193
House
House of Commons

Would the Minister confirm that the Government are not intending to break the law—and I do not think anything they have suggested is breaking the law—and will he confirm that those who say otherwise are deliberately undermining our negotiations with the EU?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 September 2020
Reference
681 c193
House
House of Commons

I support the Government’s amendments to the legislation for the reasons outlined admirably by the Minister—it did need a little strengthening and this is a welcome clarification—but I rise mainly to oppose new clause 1.

I am disappointed with the official Opposition, because I was delighted after the clear decision of...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 September 2020
Reference
681 c225
House
House of Commons

I must not take up too much time. I wish to develop my argument quickly.

We have to recognise what we are dealing with here. The EU withdrawal agreement was pretty unsatisfactory and one-sided because the previous Parliament stopped the Government putting a strong British case and getting the support of...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 September 2020
Reference
681 cc225-6
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that we have these complications with this agreement because it was only half an agreement? The original idea was that

nothing was agreed until everything was agreed, which would include the future relationship. A lot of that had to be shunted into the political declaration....

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 September 2020
Reference
681 c207
House
House of Commons

I rise to support clauses 46 and 47 and to disagree with the Opposition amendments. It is a great pity that the SNP wishes to turn every debate in this House into a debate on independence when they lost the referendum, because, as a great democrat, I have only ever...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2020
Reference
680 c349
House
House of Commons

I do not see any problem at all. I cannot for one moment believe that the United Kingdom Government would want to force on Scotland a project that Scottish people did not wish. Nor do I recognise this idea of the sovereign Scottish Parliament; it is completely under the power...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2020
Reference
680 c349
House
House of Commons

No, most certainly that is not the point, and that is not my position. I am a democrat, and I have accepted completely the results of the referendums on devolution. It is quite true that I and my party were on the other side in the referendum on devolution. I...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2020
Reference
680 c350
House
House of Commons

I do not accept that it does any of those things. I think we are legislating in a perfectly legal and sensible manner.

I shall go back to the remarks I wish to make as to why it is better that we pay for our own projects rather than doing so...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2020
Reference
680 cc350-1
House
House of Commons

I am not pursuing a hard Brexit; I am pursuing the independence of our country which was voted on all too many years ago and which this Parliament, in a previous guise, deliberately blocked, delayed and diluted. I am very proud to belong to a Parliament that is now clearly...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2020
Reference
680 c352
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister confirm that there will be absolutely no reduction in safety standards—because we all want high safety standards—and does she recall that when REACH first came in, quite a lot of industry voices said that it was more bureaucratic and more expensive but no safer?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2019
Reference
655 c77
House
House of Commons

Maybe I can help the Minister. Is it not the case that the Intrastat declarations provide the necessary information about the current trade in European chemicals?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2019
Reference
655 c82
House
House of Commons

Surely global companies are used to selling into a variety of jurisdictions with different regulatory requirements, and each company has a body of intellectual property that it owns and sends to the appropriate regulator. I do not see any need to duplicate the work if that is already there. If...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2019
Reference
655 c84
House
House of Commons