Skip to main content

1-9 of 9 results for subject:Devolution

Member X
Lord Redwood
Subject X
Climate change

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Redwood, Lord (9)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Climate change (9)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, that the national insurance increase and the farms tax were very bad ideas which did considerable damage. It is a pity that more noble Lords behind the Government did not make that clearer in time to avoid the disaster.

I hope...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc306-7
House
House of Lords

rose—

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2023
Reference
738 c204
House
House of Commons

First, I wish to address the question of housing supply in the national planning policy framework, amendment 44 and others. I support the Government in rejecting the Lords amendments—in most cases, those amendments make the Bill worse—but we need greater clarity from the Government about how the national planning policy...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2023
Reference
738 cc216-8
House
House of Commons

Given the Minister’s enthusiasm for devolution and the wish to spread investment more sensibly around the country, what extra powers will local communities have to decide what is a realistic number of new homes in any given area?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2023
Reference
738 c184
House
House of Commons

I rise to support clauses 46 and 47 and to disagree with the Opposition amendments. It is a great pity that the SNP wishes to turn every debate in this House into a debate on independence when they lost the referendum, because, as a great democrat, I have only ever...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2020
Reference
680 c349
House
House of Commons

I do not see any problem at all. I cannot for one moment believe that the United Kingdom Government would want to force on Scotland a project that Scottish people did not wish. Nor do I recognise this idea of the sovereign Scottish Parliament; it is completely under the power...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2020
Reference
680 c349
House
House of Commons

No, most certainly that is not the point, and that is not my position. I am a democrat, and I have accepted completely the results of the referendums on devolution. It is quite true that I and my party were on the other side in the referendum on devolution. I...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2020
Reference
680 c350
House
House of Commons

I do not accept that it does any of those things. I think we are legislating in a perfectly legal and sensible manner.

I shall go back to the remarks I wish to make as to why it is better that we pay for our own projects rather than doing so...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2020
Reference
680 cc350-1
House
House of Commons

I am not pursuing a hard Brexit; I am pursuing the independence of our country which was voted on all too many years ago and which this Parliament, in a previous guise, deliberately blocked, delayed and diluted. I am very proud to belong to a Parliament that is now clearly...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2020
Reference
680 c352
House
House of Commons