1-20 of 62 results for house:"House of Lords"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.398 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.006 seconds
- Search query
- house:"House of Lords"
- We searched for
- legislature_ses:25277
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
My Lords, I shall speak to Amendment 23, which I described in Committee, and in support of Amendment 20—so ably moved by the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee—and Amendments 21, 22 and 31. When I was Chief Inspector of Prisons, with responsibility for inspecting what were then called immigration detention centres,...
My Lords, I shall speak to Amendment 23, which I described in Committee, and in support of Amendment 20—so ably moved by the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee—and Amendments 21, 22 and 31. When I was Chief Inspector of Prisons, with responsibility for inspecting what were then called immigration detention centres,...
My Lords, I shall speak to Amendment 70, which is in my name and those of the noble Baronesses, Lady Hamwee, Lady Lister of Burtersett and Lady Jones of Moulsecoomb. I also wish to support Amendments 39, 40, 41 and 94, so ably introduced by the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee....
My Lords, I shall speak to Amendment 70, which is in my name and those of the noble Baronesses, Lady Hamwee, Lady Lister of Burtersett and Lady Jones of Moulsecoomb. I also wish to support Amendments 39, 40, 41 and 94, so ably introduced by the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee....
My Lords, I have nothing to add to what the other speakers have said so powerfully. I look forward to the Minister’s response.
8 pm
My Lords, I have nothing to add to what the other speakers have said so powerfully. I look forward to the Minister’s response.
8 pm
This draconian measure can only exacerbate that deterioration, which is why its use should be limited to 24 hours at most. I must admit that the Minister has confused me in her reply to the first group of amendments that were discussed by the Committee.
This draconian measure can only exacerbate that deterioration, which is why its use should be limited to 24 hours at most. I must admit that the Minister has confused me in her reply to the first group of amendments that were discussed by the Committee.
My Lords, I will concentrate on an amendment which I hope will be tabled in this House, even though it was defeated in the other place, proposing new Clause 7. This would limit the time that may be spent in immigration detention to 28 days. It was moved by David...
My Lords, I will concentrate on an amendment which I hope will be tabled in this House, even though it was defeated in the other place, proposing new Clause 7. This would limit the time that may be spent in immigration detention to 28 days. It was moved by David...
Lords motion to regret. Motion withdrawn.
Lords motion to regret. Motion withdrawn.
My Lords, I will not beat about the bush. The purpose of my regret Motion is to ask the Minister whether the Government will consider the immediate withdrawal of these two statutory instruments before they can do harm to certain vulnerable individuals, and until a number of preconditions, of which...
My Lords, I will not beat about the bush. The purpose of my regret Motion is to ask the Minister whether the Government will consider the immediate withdrawal of these two statutory instruments before they can do harm to certain vulnerable individuals, and until a number of preconditions, of which...
My Lords, I thank the Minister for her comments. I note that many of them are more general than the point of my Motion to Regret, which is to do with detention. I shall pick up on her last point about the training of caseworkers. I would be most grateful...
My Lords, I thank the Minister for her comments. I note that many of them are more general than the point of my Motion to Regret, which is to do with detention. I shall pick up on her last point about the training of caseworkers. I would be most grateful...
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have plans to introduce a robust screening process so that immigrants and asylum seekers who are survivors of sexual and gender-based violence, and others who are recognised as vulnerable under their adults at risk policy, are identified before they are detained.
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have plans to introduce a robust screening process so that immigrants and asylum seekers who are survivors of sexual and gender-based violence, and others who are recognised as vulnerable under their adults at risk policy, are identified before they are detained.
In response to the Stephen Shaw review the Government has introduced a range of measures to identify and safeguard vulnerable people liable to be detained for immigration purposes
The adults at risk in immigration detention policy, which came into force on 12 September 2016 has introduced a case-by-case evidence-based assessment of the appropriateness of detention for any individual, including victims of sexual or gender based violence, who is considered vulnerable, balanced against the immigration control considerations that apply in their case.
The policy is supported by the cross-cutting Detention Gatekeeper, which assesses vulnerability and provides challenge to decisions about who enters immigration detention, and scrutinises prospects and speed of removal.
The Detention Centre Rules 2001 (Statutory Instrument) and published Home Office guidance provide additional safeguards including individuals being offered a physical and mental examination within 24 hours of admission to detention, a requirement for immigration removal centre doctors to report to the Home Office any special illness or conditions (including torture) that might affect an individual remaining in detention and processes for staff to follow when there has been a change to the physical or mental health of a detainee, or a change in the nature or severity of their identified vulnerability, that may impact on the decision to detain.
To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the average duration of detention for adult asylum seekers in the UK in 2017.
To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the average duration of detention for adult asylum seekers in the UK in 2017.
Information on the length of detention of people leaving detention is available in tables dt_06_q and dt_09_q of the detention tables in the latest releases of ‘Immigration Statistics, July to September 2017’, available from the Home Office website at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/662536/detention-jul-sep-2017-tables.ods.
The table includes a breakdown of adults and child detainees who have previously claimed asylum at some stage. However, we cannot identify those minors which were unaccompanied. Figures for Q4 2017 will be released on 22 February 2018.
People leaving detention by length of detention, January to September 2017 | |||
Length of detention | Total Detainees | Of which: Adult asylum detainees | Child asylum detainees |
*Total | 20,730 | 10,222 | 24 |
A: 3 days or less | 5,514 | 2,044 | 21 |
B: 4 to 7 days | 1,483 | 855 | 2 |
C: 8 to 14 days | 2,604 | 1,086 | 1 |
D: 15 to 28 days | 3,619 | 1,550 | 0 |
E: 29 days to less than 2 months | 3,494 | 1,875 | 0 |
F: 2 months to less than 3 months | 1,566 | 978 | 0 |
G: 3 months to less than 4 months | 794 | 546 | 0 |
H: 4 months to less than 6 months | 813 | 631 | 0 |
I: 6 months to less than 12 months | 680 | 536 | 0 |
J: 12 months to less than 18 months | 100 | 75 | 0 |
K: 18 months to less than 24 months | 41 | 31 | 0 |
L: 24 months to less than 36 months | 20 | 15 | 0 |
M: 36 months to less than 48 months | 2 | 0 | 0 |
N: 48 months or more | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Figures are provisional. | |||
Asylum detainees: People detained solely under Immigration Act powers | |||
who are recorded as having sought asylum at some stage. | |||
The median length of detention for adults, who had claimed asylum at some point, between January and September 2017, was between 15 and 28 days. There are a small number of detainees who have been detained for long periods of time, which would skew the mean value. The median is therefore the most suitable average for these data.
To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the average duration of detention for all minors seeking asylum in the UK in 2017.
To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the average duration of detention for all minors seeking asylum in the UK in 2017.
Information on the length of detention of people leaving detention is available in tables dt_06_q and dt_09_q of the detention tables in the latest releases of ‘Immigration Statistics, July to September 2017’, available from the Home Office website at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/662536/detention-jul-sep-2017-tables.ods.
The table includes a breakdown of adults and child detainees who have previously claimed asylum at some stage. However, we cannot identify those minors which were unaccompanied. Figures for Q4 2017 will be released on 22 February 2018.
People leaving detention by length of detention, January to September 2017 | |||
Length of detention | Total Detainees | Of which: Adult asylum detainees | Child asylum detainees |
*Total | 20,730 | 10,222 | 24 |
A: 3 days or less | 5,514 | 2,044 | 21 |
B: 4 to 7 days | 1,483 | 855 | 2 |
C: 8 to 14 days | 2,604 | 1,086 | 1 |
D: 15 to 28 days | 3,619 | 1,550 | 0 |
E: 29 days to less than 2 months | 3,494 | 1,875 | 0 |
F: 2 months to less than 3 months | 1,566 | 978 | 0 |
G: 3 months to less than 4 months | 794 | 546 | 0 |
H: 4 months to less than 6 months | 813 | 631 | 0 |
I: 6 months to less than 12 months | 680 | 536 | 0 |
J: 12 months to less than 18 months | 100 | 75 | 0 |
K: 18 months to less than 24 months | 41 | 31 | 0 |
L: 24 months to less than 36 months | 20 | 15 | 0 |
M: 36 months to less than 48 months | 2 | 0 | 0 |
N: 48 months or more | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Figures are provisional. | |||
Asylum detainees: People detained solely under Immigration Act powers | |||
who are recorded as having sought asylum at some stage. | |||
The median length of detention for adults, who had claimed asylum at some point, between January and September 2017, was between 15 and 28 days. There are a small number of detainees who have been detained for long periods of time, which would skew the mean value. The median is therefore the most suitable average for these data.
To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the average duration of detention for unaccompanied minors seeking asylum in the UK in 2017.
To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the average duration of detention for unaccompanied minors seeking asylum in the UK in 2017.
Information on the length of detention of people leaving detention is available in tables dt_06_q and dt_09_q of the detention tables in the latest releases of ‘Immigration Statistics, July to September 2017’, available from the Home Office website at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/662536/detention-jul-sep-2017-tables.ods.
The table includes a breakdown of adults and child detainees who have previously claimed asylum at some stage. However, we cannot identify those minors which were unaccompanied. Figures for Q4 2017 will be released on 22 February 2018.
People leaving detention by length of detention, January to September 2017 | |||
Length of detention | Total Detainees | Of which: Adult asylum detainees | Child asylum detainees |
*Total | 20,730 | 10,222 | 24 |
A: 3 days or less | 5,514 | 2,044 | 21 |
B: 4 to 7 days | 1,483 | 855 | 2 |
C: 8 to 14 days | 2,604 | 1,086 | 1 |
D: 15 to 28 days | 3,619 | 1,550 | 0 |
E: 29 days to less than 2 months | 3,494 | 1,875 | 0 |
F: 2 months to less than 3 months | 1,566 | 978 | 0 |
G: 3 months to less than 4 months | 794 | 546 | 0 |
H: 4 months to less than 6 months | 813 | 631 | 0 |
I: 6 months to less than 12 months | 680 | 536 | 0 |
J: 12 months to less than 18 months | 100 | 75 | 0 |
K: 18 months to less than 24 months | 41 | 31 | 0 |
L: 24 months to less than 36 months | 20 | 15 | 0 |
M: 36 months to less than 48 months | 2 | 0 | 0 |
N: 48 months or more | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Figures are provisional. | |||
Asylum detainees: People detained solely under Immigration Act powers | |||
who are recorded as having sought asylum at some stage. | |||
The median length of detention for adults, who had claimed asylum at some point, between January and September 2017, was between 15 and 28 days. There are a small number of detainees who have been detained for long periods of time, which would skew the mean value. The median is therefore the most suitable average for these data.
To ask Her Majesty's Government when the short-term detention rules will be published.
To ask Her Majesty's Government when the short-term detention rules will be published.
The Short Term Holding Facility Rules are expected to be made by the end of 2017.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is their response to the recommendations by Women for Refugee Women for the use of support and engagement in the asylum process as a means of reducing the use of immigration detention, contained in the report The Way Ahead; an asylum system without detention,...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is their response to the recommendations by Women for Refugee Women for the use of support and engagement in the asylum process as a means of reducing the use of immigration detention, contained in the report The Way Ahead; an asylum system without detention,...
We note the recommendations in the report.
Detention is used sparingly, especially in the case of those who have claimed asylum. The overwhelming majority of asylum claimants remain in the community whilst their cases are considered. Only a very small minority of asylum claimants are detained whilst their case is considered and this is normally where they have claimed asylum after already having been detained for removal.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what progress has been made in introducing individual removals plans as outlined in their response to the independent review into the welfare in detention of vulnerable persons, published on 14 January.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what progress has been made in introducing individual removals plans as outlined in their response to the independent review into the welfare in detention of vulnerable persons, published on 14 January.
Since the publication of the Government’s response to Stephen Shaw’s Report into the welfare in detention of vulnerable persons on 14 January, work has been ongoing to design a more effective case management process to replace the existing method of reviewing detention.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they intend to change their revised definition of torture issued on 12 September, in the light of position statement PS07/16 of the Royal College of Psychiatrists on the definition of torture in the context of immigration detention policy, issued in December.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they intend to change their revised definition of torture issued on 12 September, in the light of position statement PS07/16 of the Royal College of Psychiatrists on the definition of torture in the context of immigration detention policy, issued in December.
Following a court order dated 2 December 2016 in the case of R (on the application of Medical Justice) v the Secretary of State for the Home Department, in respect of the Home Office policy on adults at risk in immigration detention, the Home Office has reverted to the pre-12 September definition of torture in the context of immigration detention, until the Court reaches its final judgment in the case. As court proceedings are ongoing it would not be appropriate to comment on the statement from the Royal College of Psychiatrists.
My Lords, I join noble Lords in thanking my noble and learned friend Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood for obtaining this debate, and congratulate him on the masterly way in which he introduced it.
I note that my noble friend’s Motion uses the words “armed conflict”, not “war”. I must say that...
My Lords, I join noble Lords in thanking my noble and learned friend Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood for obtaining this debate, and congratulate him on the masterly way in which he introduced it.
I note that my noble friend’s Motion uses the words “armed conflict”, not “war”. I must say that...
My Lords, I congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Moulsecoomb, on obtaining this debate, and I thank her for it. I salute her persistent pursuit of the right course of action regarding the detention of pregnant women. I also thank the House of Lords Library for yet another comprehensive...
My Lords, I congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Moulsecoomb, on obtaining this debate, and I thank her for it. I salute her persistent pursuit of the right course of action regarding the detention of pregnant women. I also thank the House of Lords Library for yet another comprehensive...
My Lords, I will speak to my Amendments 84 and 85, and comment on government Amendment 86. Since I proposed to the Minister in Committee that the Bill should be temporarily withdrawn so that it could be redrafted to reflect the Government’s countless changes of mind during its passage and...
My Lords, I will speak to my Amendments 84 and 85, and comment on government Amendment 86. Since I proposed to the Minister in Committee that the Bill should be temporarily withdrawn so that it could be redrafted to reflect the Government’s countless changes of mind during its passage and...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what audit procedures are performed across the immigration detention estate to ensure that the requirements of Detention Services Order 13/2012 regarding the transfer of medical records when transferring detainees between detention centres, or removing them under escort, are carried out.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what audit procedures are performed across the immigration detention estate to ensure that the requirements of Detention Services Order 13/2012 regarding the transfer of medical records when transferring detainees between detention centres, or removing them under escort, are carried out.
Operating Standards and contracts for service providers in the immigration detention estate require them to operate a schedule of self audit to include compliance with the Detention Centre Rules 2001, Operating Standards and Detention Service Orders.
Since 1 September 2014 the preparation and presentation of medical records and discharge summaries to detainees on release or unescorted removal is the responsibility of service providers commissioned by NHS England. NHS England’s national specifications for healthcare commissioned in Immigration Removal Centres requires providers to have in place a programme of annual audit in line with their organisation’s clinical governance framework.
The first annual audits under the new arrangements have not yet taken place.