Skip to main content

1-20 of 56 results for house:"House of Lords"

Member X
Lord Ramsbotham
Subject X
Crime prevention

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Ramsbotham, Lord (56)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Crime prevention (56)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I entirely understand why the Government feel that they have an obligation to take meaningful and effective steps to protect the public from those who use offensive weapons. Even before today’s letter in the Times, though, I already had five reasons for being extremely concerned about their proposal...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2019
Reference
795 cc378-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support my noble friend’s amendment because it advocates one public health approach, along the lines advocated in the serious violence strategy. The sad fact is, however, that too many of the intervention and preventive measures outlined in the strategy are not sufficiently resourced and may not materialise.

Last...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2019
Reference
795 c312GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have added my name to Amendments 4 and 5, and I will also speak to the other amendments in this group. I looked in vain for Amendment 19 on the Marshalled List and the order of groupings today but I noticed that it is not there. As...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 c165GC
House
House of Lords

I am sorry. I mentioned at Second Reading that I was astonished that the Bill should bring forward the Home Secretary’s apparent desire to increase the number of mandatory short sentences while the Ministry of Justice and its Secretary of State, followed by the Prisons Minister last Saturday in the...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 cc165-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I put my name to this amendment purely to be consistent with what I said at Second Reading. As the noble Lord, Lord Paddick, has pointed out, it could be that children are sent to collect corrosive substances from shops. They do not know that the substance is...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 c196GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ramsbotham

34: Clause 8, page 8, line 39, leave out “16” and insert “18”

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 c204GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 34 in my name and those of others, I will speak to my opposition to the clause. My comments about Amendment 34 apply to the clause as a whole.

The noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, has already mentioned the very good briefing which many Members have received...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 cc204-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 c211GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have taken part in the debate on this amendment. I assure the Minister that this is not a matter of principle against short sentences. I have seen how ineffective they are. I know how ineffective they are, and I have been saying...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 c211GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the noble Lord, Lord Bethell, in this, because so many things that were alleged about the inefficiency of various measures are unproven. For example, short sentences are said to be no deterrent. We do not know for certain, and therefore I support entirely a continuous review....

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 c212GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ramsbotham

108: Clause 32, page 31, line 2, at end insert—

“( ) No secure college may be established until comprehensive rules on the operation of secure colleges, including the use of force and the treatment of young persons with mental or physical health needs, have been made under section...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2014
Reference
756 c642
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendments 111 and 121.

Last Thursday, the noble Baroness, Lady Tyler, initiated a debate to take note of Her Majesty’s Government’s social justice strategy in which I quoted the words of the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Iain Duncan Smith, who, in...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2014
Reference
756 cc642-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for his careful, thoughtful and wide-ranging response. I know that I speak for everyone in the House in saying that we agree with him both that we need to reduce the dreadful record of reoffending in our young offender establishments and that...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2014
Reference
756 c663
House
House of Lords

Having said that and witnessed the Minister’s customary graciousness, I agree with him that there has been an enormous amount of engagement and effort by officials and others to engage with people, but that engagement has been not about if the secure college will be established but when. We therefore...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2014
Reference
756 cc663-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak both to this amendment and Amendment 110. I know that I am up against a very strong three-line government Whip and, unlike the Minister, I am not a skilled advocate nor have I anything to do with party politics. If I were to be granted...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2014
Reference
756 cc666-9
House
House of Lords

Will the noble Lord exclude Clayfields from that, where the reconviction rate is 18% and costs are £185,000 a year?

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2014
Reference
756 c678
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ramsbotham

111: Clause 32, page 32, line 17, leave out from “43” to end of line 18 and insert “may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament”

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2014
Reference
756 c679
House
House of Lords

I wish to test the opinion of the House.

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2014
Reference
756 c682
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ramsbotham

118: Schedule 6, page 95, line 18, at end insert—

“(2A) No contract may be entered into under sub-paragraph (1) until the Secretary of State has, by regulations made by statutory instrument, specified the criteria to be applied in the selection of such contractors.

(2B) A statutory instrument containing regulations...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2014
Reference
756 c693
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will be brief because much of what I am going to say has already been said, particularly in relation to the criteria. I would like to raise two points. First, I am concerned about the criteria, about which we know nothing, relating to the selection of application...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2014
Reference
756 cc693-4
House
House of Lords