Skip to main content

1-20 of 105 results for subject:"Human embryo experiments"

Member X
Baroness Primarolo

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Primarolo, Baroness (105)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

No. I am trying to make some brief comments—

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c408
House
House of Commons

The process was demanding because we were invited to consider issues that strike at the heart of what it means to be human. We have also looked—

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c408
House
House of Commons

I am listening very carefully to what the hon. Gentleman is saying. His basic argument relates to something falling outside the current prohibitions in the Bill. However, does he not agree that the definition of human admixed embryos, already discussed in the House, covers tetraploid complementation so that the Bill's...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c351
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for allowing an intervention. An application to the HFEA for a licence would have to be made at the outset if it was believed that the human DNA would become predominant, so it would be covered. Whether that was predominant at the start...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c370
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend will know that that is not for me to say as a Minister. I may have a view personally, but I am speaking from the Dispatch Box as a Minister. There is a free vote, and each Member will be able to decide. Those are the...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c335
House
House of Commons

With the leave of the House, Mr. Deputy Speaker. These are very important matters, and it is important to focus on the Bill. It is about IVF treatment. Actually, it is about access to the treatment, the improvement of that treatment and broadening the range of people who are entitled...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c334
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,"That the Order of 12th May 2008 (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] (Programme)) be varied as follows:""1. Paragraphs 10 and 11 of the Order shall be omitted.""2. Proceedings on consideration shall be taken in the following order: amendments to the clauses of the Bill; amendments to...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c324
House
House of Commons

We have looked at how to make regulation more inclusive and more reflective of 21st century society and family structures, including by covering the rights of same-sex couples.

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c408
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read the Third time. It has been a long journey to Third Reading, but a shared one, involving two years of scrutiny and discussion.

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c408
House
House of Commons

When science throws our views and ethics into flux, legislation brings regulation and stability. The House has struck a new consensus of allowing science to stretch its wings and develop, but constraining it within what the House considers to be ethically acceptable. The US physician, Richard Cabot, said that science...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c409
House
House of Commons

The Government have listened carefully to views about what should be allowed, what should be prescribed and what controls should exist. I believe that we have arrived at the right balance of controlling but not constraining scientific research, with protection from a ““Brave New World”” scenario in which science overrides...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c408-9
House
House of Commons

None of the decisions were taken lightly. Indeed, precisely because of the Bill's controversial nature, because it involved such profound social and ethical issues, and because it was always going to provoke very different views, we depended more than ever on the guidance and scrutiny of those in this House...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c408
House
House of Commons

I start by saying clearly—I will return to this point, as the hon. Member for Boston and Skegness (Mark Simmonds) asked me to—that the Bill sets out a clear prohibition on human reproductive cloning and the genetic modification of gametes or embryos that are to be used for treatment purposes....

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c385-6
House
House of Commons

Hon. Members know that the Bill is about helping the one in seven couples who need assistance with their fertility. It is about research to deal with the dreadful diseases and the debilitating attacks on their health from which many in our society suffer. The Bill is about combining science...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c388-9
House
House of Commons

I am asking my hon. Friend to think about being involved in the consultation, participating in the public debate and improving the draft regulations if and when they come forward. He should then fully participate in an affirmative resolution debate in the House before the regulations are passed. I am...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c386-8
House
House of Commons

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill (HL). Programme motion (No 2) varying the order of proceedings on report stage and third reading. Agreed to on division (322 votes to 157). Report stage. Clause 3 debated with amendments and new clause 24. Amendments negatived on division. Third reading debate. Agreed to on...

Lead member
Baroness Primarolo
Answering member
Mark Simmonds
Department
Department of Health
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
Daily part printing error - Division No. 286, c398, in the Ayes insert: "Soames, Mr. Nicholas".
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c324-414, (corrigendum) 544;481 c324-414
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 30 June 2008, Official Report, column 659W, on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill, what account was taken of the status of pro-nuclei as non-equivalent to the nucleus of an embryonic cell in developing the provisions of...

Asked by
David Leslie Taylor (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 July 2008
Reference
478 c1798W; 216809
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health with reference to the definitions of the terms (a) pronucleus and (b) embryo given by the Minister of State in the Public Bill Committee on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill on 3 June 2008, Official Report, columns 13 and 24, for...

Asked by
David Leslie Taylor (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2008
Reference
214500; 478 c659W;478 c661W
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Lady for saying that she supports abortion. She will agree that it is a good point that 89 per cent. of abortions are conducted in the first 13 weeks, so her case about getting more done does not really stand up.

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2008
Reference
476 c258
House
House of Commons

Where?

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2008
Reference
476 c259
House
House of Commons