Skip to main content

1-20 of 86 results for subject:Science

Member X
Ian Pearson

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Pearson, Ian (86)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills what recent representations he has received on the adequacy of supply of graduates in mathematics and sciences.

Asked by
Nigel Evans (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 July 2008
Reference
218733; 479 c506-7W;479 c504-5W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills how much was spent on science research in each year since 1997; and what the projected spending is for each year to 2011.

Asked by
Gordon Prentice (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
216739; 478 c1488-90W
House
House of Commons

Main estimates 2008-09. Third estimates day (part two). Motion that, for the year ending with 31st March 2009, for expenditure by the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills— (1) further resources, not exceeding £11,040,399,000, be authorised for use as set out in House of Commons Paper No. 479, (2) a...

Lead member
Lord Willis of Knaresborough
Answering member
Ian Pearson
Department
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Estimates days
Date
7 July 2008
Reference
478 c1212-53
House
House of Commons

Yes, I do. I have said on record—and will continue to say—that the Government want Daresbury to develop as a world-class centre for science and innovation. We do not perceive its future as a technology park, as some have suggested. I shall say more about that later, especially in response...

Member
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2008
Reference
478 c1249-51
House
House of Commons

The Government welcome the report of the Select Committee's inquiry into the science budget allocations, and we very much welcome this debate. I appreciate the overall constructive way in which the hon. Member for Harrogate and Knaresborough (Mr. Willis) raised the issues mentioned in the report. There are clearly matters...

Member
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2008
Reference
478 c1248-9
House
House of Commons

I agree that, in all such cases, it is matter of balance. However, I remind my hon. Friend and the House that the Government are committed to investment in basic research. That underpins the later commercial exploitation of research. As he knows, we support some of that commercialisation and applied...

Member
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2008
Reference
478 c1249
House
House of Commons

Let us be clear about what I said. I said that no system was perfect. I am sure that the peer review process has scope for improvement, and that is something that research councils look at regularly to ensure that the structures are right. However, I shall say something more...

Member
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2008
Reference
478 c1251
House
House of Commons

I shall talk about delivery plans in a moment—[Interruption.] What I can say in response to the hon. Gentleman is that, through our officials, the Government want to work closely with the research councils. That level of communication is exactly what hon. Members would expect, but it is ultimately up...

Member
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2008
Reference
478 c1251-3
House
House of Commons
We have regular meetings with the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform at ministerial and official level on a wide range of issues, including joint meetings with the chairs of the regional development agencies.
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 June 2008
Reference
478 c479
House
House of Commons
I am sure that a great deal of importance will be attached to ensuring that businesses are involved in the bids for these new universities. I want to make the basic point that we as a Labour Government will have tripled the science budget by 2010-11—an increase way above the trend rate of growth of the UK economy. The Conservative party policy, as I understand it, is to share the proceeds of growth—
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 June 2008
Reference
478 c481
House
House of Commons
The budget for the Science and Technology Facilities Council is actually going up over the next three years. Compared with its baseline, it is going up by 13.6 per cent.; that is perhaps not as much as some in the community would like, but to suggest that there has been a cut is simply wrong. It is important, however, that the university research base talks to and deals with the regional development agencies. We already have commitments to Research Councils UK, for example, by working together with the regional development agencies and the Technology Strategy Board. That is happening as we speak in Manchester and in other universities in the north-west. Such links are important because we need to ensure that our strategy is co-ordinated.
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 June 2008
Reference
478 c480
House
House of Commons
It is a bit rich for the hon. Gentleman to accuse the Government of boasting when a campaign to save British science had to take place back in 1997. He must answer whether he is prepared to meet the Government's spending commitments—the commitment to real-terms growth by 2014. The difference between sharing the proceeds of growth and our plans amounts to hundreds of millions of pounds. The scientific community has a right to understand where the Opposition stand. On post-doctoral research grants, the figures for astronomy and particle physics are massively up compared with 2005-06. It will be up to the STFC to take the detailed decisions on research grants. As the hon. Gentleman knows, it is going through a programmatic review process, and we will await the outcomes of that.
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 June 2008
Reference
478 c481
House
House of Commons
I agree with my hon. Friend that Wolverhampton is an excellent university. What is important for the Government is that we fund excellent research. I am tremendously proud of the world-class research conducted in our universities. We have to ensure that the people taking the decisions on what is the best research to fund are independent of the Government. That is why we have the Research Councils and why it has an extensive peer review process. That is the right approach for taking decisions on individual research projects.
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 June 2008
Reference
478 c480-1
House
House of Commons
We continue to see sustained investment in science at a UK level. The science and research budget has doubled since 1997 and it will have tripled by 2010-11. What we have to do is invest in excellent science. At the Government level, we take strategic decisions about the overall direction of science funding—on full economic costing, for example—but it is really up to the Research Councils and the peer review process to determine what is the best research and to fund that accordingly.
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 June 2008
Reference
478 c480
House
House of Commons
What recent discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform on regional development agency funding for science in universities.
Asked by
Ben Wallace (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
26 June 2008
Reference
478 c479; 213860
House
House of Commons

The following statement provides information on the Competitiveness Council that took place in Brussels on 29-30 May. The research session of the Council was held on 30 May and was chaired by Mojca Kucler Dolinar, Slovenian Minister for Higher Education, Science and Technology. A ministerial dinner took place on 29...

Member
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Department
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Written statements
Date
6 June 2008
Reference
476 c75WS
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills what assessment has been made of the effect of Student and Technology Facilities Council funding cuts on university science departments with particular reference to (a) staffing, (b) student recruitment and (c) research development; and if he will make a...

Asked by
Mark Hunter (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 June 2008
Reference
476 c973W; 207368
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to confirm the agenda items for which DIUS is responsible, at the forthcoming EU Competitiveness Council on 29-30 May in Brussels. The research session of the Council will be held on 30 May and will be chaired by Mojca Kucler Dolinar, Slovenian Minister for Higher Education, Science...

Member
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Department
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Written statements
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
476 c41-2WS
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills with which third sector organisations his Department is working as a strategic partner on projects relating to science and innovation.

Asked by
Stephen Williams (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 May 2008
Reference
476 c394W; 206299
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills what recent assessment he has made of the role of the research councils in promoting scientific research in the public sector.

Asked by
David Leslie Taylor (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 May 2008
Reference
475 c1766W; 205673
House
House of Commons