Skip to main content

1-20 of 51 results for subject:Fingerprints

Member X
Earl of Onslow

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Onslow, Earl of (51)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I am a member of the Joint Select Committee on Human Rights; I shall leave it the day after tomorrow, or whenever Parliament rises, because I have done my four years. The committee looked at this issue and did not think it would pass the Human Rights Act...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
718 c1547-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord for his first remarks, which were generous and in stark contrast to those of the noble Lord, Lord Myners, on the previous Question—perhaps that is a bit unfair. I do not know whether this is possible, but Amendment No. 61A goes on for...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2008
Reference
705 c131
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has now said several times that there is a need for a proper debate on this. Those of us who take a very dim view of the Government’s creeping practice would like to know when this debate is going to take place and if, as a result,...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c392
House
House of Lords

Can the noble Lord help me a little on this? If someone is detained for up to 28 days, presumably their fingerprints and a DNA sample will be taken. If they are released as completely innocent, will the fingerprints and sample be destroyed or will they be kept?

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c385
House
House of Lords

If the noble Lord and I found ourselves in chokey together, our fingerprints would be taken. If the police then found that they had made a terrible mistake and decided that we are upright and upstanding citizens of the highest rectitude, we would be released. We can then ask for...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c386
House
House of Lords

How can someone whose fingerprints were taken covertly ask for them to be deleted? He probably does not know that they have been taken.

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c386
House
House of Lords

I apologise for being late on this. This fingerprint business is something about which I feel very strongly; I have asked Questions in the House about it, especially about DNA samples. The Government’s collecting everything in these vast databanks, particularly DNA databases, is a serious infringement on our liberties. DNA...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c380-1
House
House of Lords

No, the noble Baroness says, over there. Could we hear from them exactly what the attitude of the intelligence services is? That would underline what the noble Lord, Lord Dubs, said. I think I am right in saying that, if it can be shown that evidence has been obtained through...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c405
House
House of Lords

My name is to this amendment. I agree completely with what the noble Lord, Lord Dubs, has said. Furthermore, I would like to underline the fact that amendments in my name and those of the noble Lords, Lord Dubs and Lord Lester of Herne Hill, and the noble Baroness, Lady...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c405
House
House of Lords

I find the noble Lord’s reasoning compelling; it seems to need to make complete sense. Those at Bagram air base, the Pakistani joint intelligence service and the Syrians are people from whom we all get information. In those places, there has been well documented evidence of ill treatment. The Americans...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c407
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord may change his mind very rapidly from agreeing with us, seeing the Prime Minister and disagreeing with us 10 minutes later.

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c406
House
House of Lords

The Minister has read out something from the PACE code that goes beyond reasonable. If the PACE code goes beyond reasonable, what is wrong with putting ““reasonable”” in the Bill?

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c343
House
House of Lords

I have one small question to fill my small brain with information. Is this procedure different from the one for searching the premises of someone accused, for instance, of murder or another very serious crime, and, if so, how and why?

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c342
House
House of Lords

Is this not self-incrimination? It goes against all our traditions to put someone in prison for six months for failing to produce something that he may feel will be detrimental to him and over which he has a guilty conscience. I recall a case in the ECHR where financial people...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c344
House
House of Lords

Perhaps the noble Lord could come back on Report with a clever subsection so that people like me and even the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lloyd—whose little grey cells, as Hercule Poirot said, are infinitely greater than mine—might understand it.

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c348
House
House of Lords

Am I right to say that basically this clause states that if we seize something illegally and it turns out to be useful, we can use it?

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c348
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the noble and learned Lord quite rightly condemns the taking of DNA from people who should not give it, so why is it that the DNA base has increased enormously and contains the DNA records of a lot of people who have not been charged with anything? Is that not against our traditional British liberties?
Asked by
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2007
Reference
689 c595
House
House of Lords

It is made worse by the fact that it will be a civil penalty. Presumably the burden of proof will be on the balance of probability or be fined 2,500 quid. When people stood around a small place called Runnymede they did not expect their government to behave like that, but...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2005
Reference
676 c1023
House
House of Lords

If, as my noble friend has pointed out, there are to be only 70 registration centres and the population of this country is nearly 60 million—and assuming a 60 per cent take up, including children—that means that each centre will have a client base of three-quarters of a million people. Is this cloud...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2005
Reference
676 c1021
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness gave a wonderful Freudian slip. She listed a number of documents and said, ““We have absolutely no power of designating them””. But then she takes the power to designate them. Those of us on this side of the House who care about civil liberties find that desperately...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2005
Reference
676 c1017
House
House of Lords