Skip to main content

1-20 of 28 results for subject:Liability

Member X
Jesse Norman
Session X
2017-19

Type

House

Session

2017-19 (28)

Year

Department

Member

More
Norman, Jesse (28)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, which categories of motorised vehicles are exempt from a requirement to hold third party public liability insurance.

Asked by
Lord Dodds of Duncairn (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 February 2019
Reference
216961
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Jesse Norman
Answering member
Karl Turner
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Sixth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
9 January 2019
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Jesse Norman
Answering member
Karl Turner
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Eighth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
17 October 2018
House
House of Commons

Urgent question on the potential taxpayer liabilities that the Government have entered into in their statement of principles agreement with Heathrow Airport Ltd.

Lead member
Justine Greening
Answering member
Jesse Norman
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Urgent questions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 cc444-452
House
House of Commons

Let me thank my right hon. Friend the Member for Putney (Justine Greening) for raising this issue. She has been absolutely indefatigable on it, and I salute her.

As the Secretary of State set out in his oral statement on Tuesday, we recognise the very strong feelings on this matter of...

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 c445
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend has asked a vast number of questions. If I do not cover all the points that she raised, I shall be happy to write to her. She mentioned the Cabinet Sub-Committee; I am not a member of the Sub-Committee and have not seen the papers that...

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 cc446-7
House
House of Commons

Far from this being a bombshell, I am afraid it is the dampest of damp squibs. No indemnification has been given or was ever in question. The Opposition’s

position is not a legal position; it is an expression of some other kind. The hon. Gentleman does not seem able to...

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 c447
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for her question. We have seen many brilliant examples of crowbarring local and national issues into debates, and I salute her ingenuity in so doing. She rightly makes the point that this proposition has been left unexecuted for far too long, although it has...

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 c448
House
House of Commons

The latter point is so far outside the scope of this UQ that I hope the hon. Gentleman will not mind if I address it in the Committee session this afternoon.

On the issues the hon. Gentleman raises that are germane to the question, let me start by thanking the Scottish...

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 c449
House
House of Commons

I could say that I could not possibly comment. But it is right to acknowledge that a future Government might create a liability or contingent liability. That is not ruled out, and there might theoretically be some recourse for HAL as a result of that. One should just be—[Interruption.] That...

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 c449
House
House of Commons

The answer to that question is, because it is a number that we do not recognise, but if there were a better justification for it, it might be that we would. But of course it is perfectly clear that we do expect transport improvements to be made, and we expect...

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 c450
House
House of Commons

Of course these statements were not purely in relation to Heathrow; there were several of them, as discussed, but two have fallen away. All this does is recap a perfectly well-established set of rights it has in law, and nothing has changed from that point of view. The point of...

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 c450
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his very constructive and positive comment, and of course we will not be deflected. That is why we have laid this national policy statement, and we will be inviting Parliament to vote on it in due course.

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 c450
House
House of Commons

I know you place a premium on brevity, Mr Speaker, so I will say, yes, and £74 billion to £75 billion of expected boost to the economy.

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 c450
House
House of Commons

I think that it is perfectly clear that the NPS, a national policy statement, sets the guidelines within which this is to be elaborated. We expect Heathrow Airport Ltd—and other private entities, as may be required—to bear the full cost of the expansion, as has been indicated, and we have...

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 c451
House
House of Commons

Yes, I can. I have visited Heathrow and discussed this issue with the chief executive, and Heathrow is absolutely clear that a central part of the proposal is to enable better domestic connectivity as part of a wider international and national strategy.

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 c451
House
House of Commons

As the hon. Gentleman will be aware, Heathrow’s connectivity will be very heavily supported. It is already the beneficiary of an upgraded Piccadilly line from the east and of Crossrail, too. A lot of work is being done on western and south-western access, to say nothing of potential access from...

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 c451
House
House of Commons

I am not familiar with any changes of the kind my hon. Friend describes. It is true that the statements of principles were in substantially the same form for all three projects, and that is what we are presently addressing.

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 c452
House
House of Commons

Mr Speaker, we are some way outside the terms of the urgent question, but let me respond to the right hon. Gentleman. We are clear that this instrument creates no liabilities for the Government, which is the point at issue. As I have said, it may at some point be...

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 c452
House
House of Commons

Again, we are way off piste, but let me just say that charges are a matter for the Civil Aviation Authority, and we would expect the CAA, as the regulator, to exercise proper concern. We have made it clear that we do not want charges to rise materially from their...

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2018
Reference
642 c452
House
House of Commons