Skip to main content

1-20 of 110 results for house:"House of Lords"

Member X
Baroness Neville-Jones
Subject X
Human rights

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Neville-Jones, Baroness (110)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Human rights (110)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Moved by

Baroness Neville-Jones

17: Clause 15, page 21, line 19, leave out “capable of having” and insert “likely to have”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would narrow the definition of “incident” in regulation 1(2) of the NIS Regulations so that it covers events likely to have an adverse effect, rather than events capable...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c91GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 17, I will also speak to Amendment 28, which is closely related. Amendment 17 is in part a probing amendment about what constitutes an incident and the circumstances in which reporting is obligatory. It does not affect the amendment that I think the Government will...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc91-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have listened carefully to what the Minister has said. I had hoped that we would get greater clarity; I fear that the fog has increased. I entirely accept the point that companies have a general duty to take as many preventive measures as they can to increase...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc99-100GC
House
House of Lords

My Lord, this Bill is largely directed at a given segment of the corporate sector. That reminds us, however, that there is a very large swathe of the corporate sector that we are not focusing on directly.

However, in the corporate sector generally, the board has to be interested in all...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c126GC
House
House of Lords

Can I ask a couple of questions and make one comment? The more we hear about the conversation that is taking place on the Bill, the more anomalous the factors that have been chosen or included in the scheme become. Let me give the example of space. Plenty of us...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c146GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Goudie. I join others in thanking my noble friend the Foreign Secretary and the ministerial team in the Foreign Office for the impact they are bringing to British foreign policy. We have been asked to keep it short....

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1477-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support this Bill. When supporting a Bill, I suppose it is customary to say that one welcomes it. I am sure I am not alone in this House in facing a situation I would much prefer we did not have to act on, but I recognise the...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2020
Reference
802 cc21-2
House
House of Lords

My noble friend the Minister has set out the background to this, sadly, justified Bill, which relates to the change in the increased terrorist threat to this country. One of the main features of the threat that we now face is the geographical proximity of the conflict that it has...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2015
Reference
758 cc687-690
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the Supreme Court ruling in the case of F and Thompson.

Lead member
Baroness Neville-Jones
Department
Home Office
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c714-22
House
House of Lords

My Lords, individuals on the sex offenders register are very closely supervised—and quite rightly. Therefore, the police, NOMS and others have very detailed knowledge of the behaviour of the individuals concerned. We keep on coming back to who is best placed to make what most people would regard as a...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c721
House
House of Lords

The Government regard what they are doing as bringing them into compliance with their obligations under the Human Rights Act. Therefore we do not envisage that the work of the Commission—and of course the terms of reference have yet to be agreed—would be affected by what we are doing here....

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c719
House
House of Lords

Indeed, and we are saying that it is the correct moment to reassert the constitutional principle.

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c719
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I could point out to the noble Lord that this piece of legislation, which the courts have decided is not entirely proportionate, was passed under our predecessors, the Labour Government. This Government, in the light of the Supreme Court’s judgment, is now putting in place a mechanism that we...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c720
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord made his point several ways round. The Government are acting in conformity with the principle that they must be in conformity with the law, which is why they have brought in this amendment to the law. We perfectly well recognise that the courts interpret the law and...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c721
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may deal first with the noble Lord’s last point about the attitude of the Government to the courts. Of course the Government respect the role of the courts. It is precisely because this is a law-abiding Government who respect the rule of law that we do...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c716-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with the leave of the House, I would like to repeat a Statement made earlier today in another place by my right honourable friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department. ““The sex offenders register has existed since 1997. Since that time it has helped the police...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c714-5
House
House of Lords

It will be a proper consultation and, obviously, noble Lords and others will be free to put forward their views. On the evidence and information that will be taken into account by the police in the review, I can confirm straightaway that the MAPPA process, NOMS and those who have...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c718
House
House of Lords

My Lords, ideally, the police will be aware of the fact that their judgments in any given instance could be subject to judicial review. The law has not changed in that respect. As for the previous question about the alternative legislative route, I am not a lawyer and I hesitate...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c720
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has certainly made his point. I fear there is very little that I can add to what I have already said, by way of explanation to the House, on why the Government have taken the view that they have about the right place to take this decision.

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c722
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that I explained in response to an earlier question that it is very hard to judge the merits with these particular offences, particularly in relation to expectation about future conduct. Therefore, we feel that those closest to the individuals or offenders concerned, who have been monitoring...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c721
House
House of Lords