Skip to main content

1-20 of 28 results for subject:"Disclosure of information"

Member X
Robert Neill
Subject X
Local government

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Neill, Robert (28)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Local government (28)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Thank you, Mr Hollobone. I am delighted to see you in the Chair, not least because you were a borough councillor in my constituency before you moved to your current constituency. Most of us have had direct personal experience of local government over a number of years.

I sought a debate...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2013
Reference
556 c289WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for raising that case, which I have also come across. When I was the Minister responsible for signing off the regulations and the code, it was absolutely not the Government’s intention that the code should be construed in that way. With respect...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2013
Reference
556 cc290-5WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right, and in a number of instances right across the piece, we have come across precisely that fear of God being put into members, many of whom are voluntary public servants, sometimes in quite small district or parish councils, where they do not necessarily have...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2013
Reference
556 cc292-7WH
House
House of Commons

What we can do to help my hon. Friend in that regard is to promulgate the good practice and what is perfectly permissible. I know from my time as a member of a planning committee that it was perfectly standard practice in many authorities, and it should be perfectly open...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2013
Reference
556 cc296-9WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. It is a sad irony that Wiltshire, having got the structure right and achieved a sensible, light-touch, proportionate structure, seems none the less to have been giving out advice on a specific point that is clearly wide of the mark. That issue needs to...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2013
Reference
556 c299WH
House
House of Commons

I am immensely grateful for my hon. Friend’s presence, because he has allowed us to have a debate in real time, which is extremely useful. His point highlights the issue and takes well into double figures

the number of instances I have come across of such advice being given out....

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2013
Reference
556 cc299-302WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the Minister’s clarification. Were there to be any growth in litigation based on an erroneous interpretation of the transitional provisions, would he consider what steps the Department and the Government might take to assist the courts in ensuring that a tribunal has access to the correct...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2013
Reference
556 c308WH
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Robert Neill
Answering member
Brandon Lewis
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
16 January 2013
Reference
556 cc288-311WH
House
House of Commons

Localism Bill. Committee stage seventh sitting (morning). Written evidence reported to the House. Clauses 13 and 14 agreed to. Schedule 4 agreed to. Clauses 15 and 16 agreed to. Clause 17 under consideration.

Lead member
Lord Stunell; Robert Neill
Answering member
Baroness Keeley
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Date
3 February 2011
Reference
PBC
House
House of Commons

Localism Bill. Committee stage eighth sitting (afternoon). Clauses 17 to 20 agreed to. Clause 21, discussed with New Clause 1, agreed to. Clauses 22 to 31 agreed to.

Lead member
Lord Stunell; Greg Clark; Robert Neill
Answering member
Jack Dromey; Baroness Keeley
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Date
3 February 2011
Reference
PBC
House
House of Commons

That point very well demonstrates the pressures businesses are under and why the addition of even 2p in the pound on the business rate in its current form—about 4.3 per cent. on the current 46.2p business multiplier—would be an enormous burden on businesses, just as we hope they will be...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2009
Reference
486 c56-7
House
House of Commons

I was about to come on to Crossrail, and if you will forgive me, Mr. Deputy Speaker, I will pick up on that point. Interestingly, the briefing document that the Mayor of London made available to all Members of this House states specifically that he supports the use of the...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2009
Reference
486 c51
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2009
Reference
486 c91
House
House of Commons

He was a Conservative.

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2009
Reference
486 c65
House
House of Commons

I understand the point that the hon. Gentleman makes, but I am sure he will understand that the rules of parliamentary procedure are such that it is difficult to cast the motion in such a way that the Bill would only give effect to Crossrail. I am sure he will...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2009
Reference
486 c62
House
House of Commons

Against that background, how does the Minister justify the slashing of funding for the local authority business growth incentive scheme?

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2009
Reference
486 c45
House
House of Commons

I beg to move an amendment, to leave out from ““That”” to the end of the Question and add:"““this House declines to give a Second Reading to the Business Rate Supplements Bill because supplementary rates threaten to become another local stealth tax at a time of economic downturn; because local...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2009
Reference
486 c50-1
House
House of Commons

I will, because I was coming on to Crossrail anyway.

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2009
Reference
486 c51
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman is right to an extent: Crossrail is a unique project because of its size and extent. I will come back to that point because, in fact, it is an argument against the Government’s approach to the Bill. Secondly, it rather flies in the face of the...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2009
Reference
486 c51-2
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman, as a fair man, would not want to misquote anyone; he knows full well that I made it abundantly clear at the beginning of my speech that we support Crossrail and the use of the business rate supplements to fund the Crossrail package. However, it is...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2009
Reference
486 c58
House
House of Commons