1-1 of 1 results for subject:Enforcement
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.142 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Enforcement
- We searched for
- subject_t:Enforcement OR subject_ses:91126
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Russell, Bob (1)
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, what steps he is taking to counteract ragwort infestation.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, what steps he is taking to counteract ragwort infestation.
Asked by
Bob Russell
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Elliot Morley
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
19 October 1999
For answer on
27 October 1999
Answered on
27 October 1999
Mr. Bob Russell: To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what steps he is taking to counteract ragwort infestation.
[95317]
Mr. Morley: MAFF has policy responsibility for control of injurious weeds, of which ragwort is one, under the Weeds Act 1959. Under
its provisions, MAFF may investigate complaints from any occupiers of agricultural land who consider that their land is threatened
by ragwort spreading from land nearby. It seeks to resolve disputes between neighbours about control of injurious weeds primarily
through persuasion and good advice.
However, where such approaches are ineffective, the Weeds Act empowers MAFF to give occupiers of land formal written notice
requiring them to take control measures. If they fail to do so MAFF may enter onto the land with an accompanying agricultural
contractor, carry out the controls, and then recover the costs of the work, as a debt due to the Department.
In the case of any persistent offenders, MAFF will continue to give careful consideration to bringing a prosecution under the Act.
However, past experience has been that use of the powers of entry and recovery of reasonable costs incurred in taking direct weeds
control action is sufficiently effective.
There has been some doubt about the policy for enforcement of the Weeds Act where land is used to graze horses and is threatened by
ragwort growing nearby. Each complaint about injurious weeds will be dealt with on its own merits. However, MAFF has policy
responsibility for farmland and for farmed animals, rather than animals kept for non-agricultural businesses or for recreation. MAFF
will not normally investigate complaints about weeds threatening land used for horses, ponies or donkeys. Higher priority will be
given to protecting farm livestock.
MAFF supported the Country Landowners Association national awareness campaign to help eradicate ragwort, which came to an end during
August. That campaign helped horse owners understand what they can do to protect their own animals, as well as their neighbours'
from this poisonous weed.
Subjects
Enforcement; Land use; Weed control; Ragwort
Date
27 October 1999
Reference
336 c923W; 95317
House
House of Commons