Skip to main content

1-20 of 405 results for subject:Disability

Member X
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Morgan of Drefelin, Baroness (405)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I support the Motion of the noble Lord, Lord Patel, and in so doing I remind the House of my interest as chief executive of Breast Cancer Campaign. In particular I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Patel, on pursuing his amendment and on articulating so clearly the concerns...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 February 2012
Reference
735 c742
House
House of Lords

While the Minister is being helpful, perhaps I may seek the indulgence of the House for just a moment. I want to apologise for not having been able to get in to move my amendment because of the crowds leaving the Chamber after the EU Council Statement, but I want...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1497
House
House of Lords

I just want to thank the Minister for bringing forward Amendment 43 and the other government amendments in this group, and for listening to the debates in Committee. I do not want to detain the House in any way—I know we are engaged in several critical debates this afternoon—but the...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2012
Reference
734 c127
House
House of Lords

The Minister referred to the position of two-thirds of cancer patients. Is that before or after the changes coming from the Harrington review with regard to intravenous chemotherapy versus oral chemotherapy and the automatic move of patients into the support group?

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2012
Reference
734 c167
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is very late and I have only a couple of thousand words to get through. More seriously, the Minister has given me quite a lot to think about. Obviously, as this is only the first time that we have had a proper discussion about this, I will...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2011
Reference
733 c1384
House
House of Lords

I think that the Companion says that the Minister is able to respond on Report, so it is very nice of him to hover, but he can have a rest. Obviously the automatic entitlement is set out in regulations; I think the powers are in the 2007 Act. It would...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2011
Reference
733 c1384
House
House of Lords

When we look at the Macmillan recommendations, we can see that they take into account that people respond in a range of ways. In the recommendations that the charity made to the Harrington review, they came up with a lot of detail, and I could read it all out. No—I...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2011
Reference
733 c1382
House
House of Lords

I shall speak also to Amendment 47. First, I want to declare an interest as chief executive of Breast Cancer Campaign. I am grateful to have the opportunity to speak to these amendments that aim to ensure that cancer patients awaiting, receiving or recovering from chemotherapy or radiotherapy will automatically...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2011
Reference
733 c1377-80
House
House of Lords

24: Clause 19, page 9, line 16, at end insert— ““(e) the claimant is receiving specified treatment for cancer, is recovering from that treatment or is likely to receive such treatment within 6 months””

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2011
Reference
733 c1377
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a very important debate. I support the idea of keeping the qualifying period for PIP at three months. I also hope this debate will look at the idea of the prospective period moving from six to nine months if the Minister sees that as an appropriate...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 November 2011
Reference
732 c292-4GC
House
House of Lords

If the Minister is going to write, would he also look at explaining how many of those are dependent on local authority provision? Much of the kind of help that he is talking about is sometimes dependent on having DLA.

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 November 2011
Reference
732 c299GC
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the Minister again. Does he agree that one of the thrusts of modern health care—particularly in cancer care, where I have an interest—is to try to keep people at home for as long as possible and not requiring hospitalisation? One of the brilliant aspects of...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 November 2011
Reference
732 c300GC
House
House of Lords

In that case, perhaps I may ask another question. If this is not what it is for, we need to understand what the implications are. People who have DLA now and are being treated for cancer—to give an example of a sudden-onset condition—are utilising the benefit in that way. As...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 November 2011
Reference
732 c300GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I listened very carefully to the debate. Will the noble Lord respond to what I thought was the very important point about sending out a message? Many noble Lords talked about the name sending out a message, and the fact that the change should be understood in the...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 November 2011
Reference
732 c173GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, invite the Minister to expand further on the blue badge. Obviously, we have just had a very important discussion about passporting, carer’s allowance and so on. The Minister was almost seen to be giving me reassurance about blue badge and other mobility passporting issues. Perhaps he...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 November 2011
Reference
732 c188GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is incredibly helpful for those of us on the Cross Benches to hear from the Minister what the timetable for the subject matter for debates might be. Can I also point out how difficult it might be for some of us, with the Health and Social Care...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2011
Reference
732 c1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have the second amendment in this group, Amendment 71N. It is a big and complicated group. I have also put my name to Amendments 73, 74 and 75. I am not going to say too much about those because the noble Lord, Lord Patel, is going to...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2011
Reference
732 c5-7GC
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may make a small point before we move off this issue completely. I am also concerned about the definition of terminal. There is a question here. I cannot remember the correct terminology, and if the noble Baroness, Lady Finlay, were here she would tell me instantly, but during...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2011
Reference
732 c33-4GC
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Lord sits down, he said that there was a sense that the work capacity assessment needs to be right and that he was thinking about arbitrary cut-offs and temporary classifications. Is he saying that, in order to get this right, we have to look again at the...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2011
Reference
732 c22GC
House
House of Lords

I wish to be sure that I understand what the Minister has just said. He said that there are two reasons for choosing the 12-month period and that it is therefore not arbitrary. Therefore, the choice was made, first, due to the need to make financial savings and, secondly, because...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2011
Reference
732 c30GC
House
House of Lords