Skip to main content

1-20 of 35 results for subject:Elections

Member X
Lord McNally
Subject X
Electoral systems

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
McNally, Lord (35)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Electoral systems (35)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords debate on motion to take note of the Government's proposals for reform of the House of Lords set out in Cm 8077. (2nd day). Agreed to on question. (Motion by Baroness Boothroyd not moved).

Lead member
Lord Strathclyde
Answering member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
Department
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Type
Debates
Date
22 June 2011
Reference
728 c1251-304, 1314-80
House
House of Lords

This again from a Minister who produced a White Paper that produced no such debate. They sat on reform for a decade. When we talk about consistency, I was on the Cook-Maclennan committee prior to the 1997 election, where my party and the Labour Party both committed themselves to a...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2011
Reference
728 c1375
House
House of Lords

No, I am not taking any more interventions. Much has been made in this debate of the recommendation in paragraph 61 of the Cunningham committee report, which says: "““Our conclusions apply only to present circumstances. If the Lords acquired an electoral mandate, then in our view their role as the...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2011
Reference
728 c1376-7
House
House of Lords

Of course we would. First, there are no proposals to abolish this House. Secondly, the difference between what I am putting before the House for debate and consideration is that this has gone before the electorate in manifestos, while what my noble friend Lord Steel is proposing is an escape...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2011
Reference
728 c1378
House
House of Lords

A most unusual intervention from a Cross-Bencher—you are lucky that we do not have a Speaker. I did at one stage support the Steel Bill. I wanted it because it was the best on offer after the Straw-Hunt proposals were put on ice. The noble Baroness, Lady Royall, knows full...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2011
Reference
728 c1378
House
House of Lords

More mea culpas. The fact is, as well, that one of the benefits for those who like some aspects of the Steel Bill is that the proposals of that Bill are all now in the draft Bill before the House: a statutory Appointments Commission; ending by-elections for hereditary Peers; permanent...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2011
Reference
728 c1378-80
House
House of Lords

We are sending the matter to a committee that will take wide evidence. I hear my noble friend saying that we are ruling it out, which is not an entirely helpful intervention at this stage of the evening, but I do not think that you can set up a commission...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2011
Reference
728 c1377
House
House of Lords

Is there anybody I have not insulted yet? Please form an orderly queue. In among the insults, there are some facts. One fact is that it was at times a bit like sitting in the North Korean Parliament. I have often wondered what that was like. Speaker after speaker even...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2011
Reference
728 c1378
House
House of Lords

All three parties had it in. I have to say that that is a kind of car salesman’s excuse. Let me make it clear that I am not anticipating changing many minds during this speech. However, I am also very well aware—more than this House seems to be aware—that this...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2011
Reference
728 c1376
House
House of Lords

No, not again, Brucie.

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2011
Reference
728 c1376
House
House of Lords

You have to be patient. You are behaving as you used to do in the House of Commons. That is why wind-up speeches in the House of Commons take so long. This has been a long debate. I am not going to answer every question in 100 speeches, partly because,...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2011
Reference
728 c1376
House
House of Lords

I never said that this Chamber should have a right of veto; I said it had a right to say no. There is a difference. Usually in this House somebody is allowed to develop an argument, and I will cover the whole question that was raised. I am not trying...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2011
Reference
728 c1375-6
House
House of Lords

You will get your full two hours if you carry on like this. [Laughter.]

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2011
Reference
728 c1375
House
House of Lords

Is the noble Lord, Lord Cunningham, in his place? No, he is not. When I was on the Cunningham committee, there was great bemusement because I said, as I still believe, that the House of Lords has the right to say no. That is an essential part of the relationship...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2011
Reference
728 c1375
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I had a boyhood dream that one day I would stand at a Dispatch Box as a government Minister facing Members of a hostile House and, an hour later, purely on the basis of my oratory and eloquence, I would have turned them round on to my side....

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2011
Reference
728 c1373-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it has been a long-established practice in this House that Members occasionally close their eyes and lean back to the loudspeaker to concentrate more on the wisdom coming through it. I am shocked that the noble Lord, Lord Lipsey, is not aware of that.

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1396
House
House of Lords

We have already seen the Labour Party retreat on AV. I will leave it at that for today. The noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, has destroyed an absolutely breathtaking peroration. I will leave him to face the resentment of his colleagues, who were warming to my theme, and ask the noble...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1426
House
House of Lords

I would suggest that you have the threshold debate on Clause 8. The threshold debate that I have just quoted, however, was in fact a device of an opponent of devolution to delay devolution. Let us not pretend that a threshold does not turn every abstention into a no vote....

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1425
House
House of Lords

That is for the voters to judge. If you want this reform to fail, you do all the kind of things that the Opposition are putting forward. The coalition, on the basis of the coalition agreement, has put forward a simple proposition that we believe provides for fairer voting. I...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1425-6
House
House of Lords

We keep on making these speeches. That is the opinion of the noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours, but it is not the opinion of the Electoral Reform Society, which is just as committed to electoral reform as he is. We are putting our proposal to Parliament and our intention is to...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1426
House
House of Lords