Skip to main content

1-20 of 98 results for house:"House of Lords"

Member X
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Subject X
Railways

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
McKenzie of Luton, Lord (98)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I welcome this Statement. It has been a long time coming, and of course there is a long way to go yet; even if the noble

Baroness, Lady Randerson, is not right about the timescale, the development control order will not be completed until the early 2020s, according...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 June 2018
Reference
791 c1335
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness for introducing the debate and for her explanation of the NPS. I welcome the debate to range over the revised draft airports National Policy Statement and the issues it raises.

I agree with the analysis of the importance of aviation to the UK economy...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2018
Reference
789 cc1793-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I draw attention to my interest in the register. On the matter of upgrading infrastructure for airports, will the Minister take this opportunity to acknowledge and welcome the decision of London Luton Airport to invest £260 million in a new passenger transit system to speed transfers between the parkway rail station and the airport terminal? For the UK’s fastest-growing airport it will mean, when concluded, that journey times from London to the airport terminal will be about half an hour.

Asked by
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 2016
Reference
771 c1130
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as others have described, this is a hotchpotch of a Bill with important chunks still missing—perhaps more than we thought—and key related consultation processes still running their course or with conclusions yet undisclosed. In infrastructure parlance, the Bill could hardly be called shovel ready. Therefore, we have an...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2014
Reference
754 cc888-892
House
House of Lords

If it is not the intention to seek privatisation by this mechanism, can the Minister confirm that it is not the Government’s intention to seek it in any other legislative arrangement?

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2014
Reference
754 c899
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a particular pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Noakes. Tempted as I am to engage in the tax debate, I think I ought to stick to my prepared script and talk about local authorities.

In last month’s local elections, more than 4,000 individuals were elected in...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2014
Reference
754 cc48-52
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Eaton, on securing this rather novel debate about the well-being of the City of Bradford Metropolitan District. We also congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Williams, on a fine maiden speech.

From the briefings we have received and the contributions made today, we can...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2014
Reference
751 cc189-190GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful that noble Lords have heard the reassurance and thanks of my noble and learned friend Lord Boyd directly. We have relied on him for advice on the appropriateness of this and are happy to support the amendments. Amendment 232AB agreed. Amendments 232AC to 232AR Moved by

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2011
Reference
731 c144
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thought that we were going to have a short speech from the Minister. The first few amendments here are to do with transfer schemes and tax issues arising from the core cities amendments that we discussed earlier, so I am happy to support them, and indeed the...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2011
Reference
731 c145
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness for that response but it did not deal with the central point. I accept that there are a range of reporting requirements for local authorities over a range of aspects, but the purpose of this amendment was to say that we...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2011
Reference
731 c143
House
House of Lords

232AA: After Clause 131, insert the following new Clause— ““Report on Part 5 (1) The Secretary of State must— (a) establish an independent review of the planning provisions introduced by Part 5; (b) publish a report on this review, including any recommendations for change; and (c) lay a copy of...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2011
Reference
731 c141
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move Amendment 232AA. This calls for an independent review of the provisions of Part 5 of this Act; it calls for a report of this review, and it requires a copy of the report to be presented to both Houses of Parliament. In particular, it...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2011
Reference
731 c141-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is another interesting series of amendments tabled by the noble Lord. I cannot but agree with the proposition that doing what we can to build and empower strong local communities must be right. I am not sure that the prescription which the noble Lord offers is right...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2011
Reference
731 c77-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we obviously support the Government’s amendments on retrospective planning permission, particularly those in relation to unauthorised advertisements. I understand that my noble friend Lord Borrie and his colleagues will not press their amendments. The Government should be congratulated on listening to the arguments from across the House and...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2011
Reference
731 c97
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend has brought forward what seems to be an entirely reasonable proposition. I look forward to the Minister’s reply. I add only that I do not know whether the same issue arises in relation to projects other than railway projects. Perhaps the Minister can cover that...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2011
Reference
731 c112
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the noble Lord, Lord Best, in what he seeks. The noble Lord, Lord Greaves, says that this is not the right Bill. It may be that it is not appropriate to put something in primary legislation but, surely, it is absolutely pertinent that we discuss it...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2011
Reference
731 c135
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak in support of Amendment 223D to leave out Clause 130 and in support of the noble Baronesses, Lady Parminter and Lady Hamwee, my noble friend Lord Howarth and the noble Lord, Lord Greaves. To argue that these amendments are unnecessary and that this clause is necessary...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2011
Reference
731 c130-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the issue of green belt is one of those matters which has caused great consternation. Obviously, we will have to await the final version of the NPPF. Of course, it is not for me to defend the NPPF in its current form, but as currently drafted it seems...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2011
Reference
731 c132-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if I understand my noble friend’s proposition, it is that the hydraulic fracturing of underground rock will be brought within the national infrastructure projects regime, the planning regime that deals with major projects. I think that is central to what my noble friend is moving. We have had...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2011
Reference
731 c118
House
House of Lords

241: Clause 221, page 201, line 34, after ““7(3),”” insert— ““(ba) an order under section (Power to transfer local public functions to permitted authorities) (but see section (Orders under section (Power to transfer local public functions to permitted authorities): procedure),”” Amendment 241 agreed. Amendment 241A Moved by

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2011
Reference
731 c147
House
House of Lords