Skip to main content

1-20 of 44 results for subject:Taxation

Member X
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Subject X
Personal income

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
McKenzie of Luton, Lord (44)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Personal income (44)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, a decision by a jobholder to opt out completely undoes membership of the pension scheme into which they were automatically enrolled. Our position is that jobholders should neither gain nor lose by opting out. In addition, we do not want employers or their schemes to bear unnecessary burdens...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c144-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if the noble Lord will permit me, I can go through the detail of the calculation. I have not done it myself, but I asked about the maximum amount of interest, assuming that opt-out is at the last minute and that the refund takes the maximum time to...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c145
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the rate of interest was five per cent.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c145
House
House of Lords

moved Amendments Nos. 8 and 9: 8: Clause 8, page 6, line 2, leave out from ““become”” to end of line 2 and insert ““an active member of the scheme on that occasion;”” 9: Clause 8, page 6, line 4, after ““jobholder,”” insert ““on the basis that the jobholder has...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c138
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 6: 6: Clause 4, page 3, line 17, leave out subsection (4) and insert— ““( ) A scheme ceases to be a scheme of the relevant kind, in the case of any person, if it ceases to have a feature by reference to which regulations under this...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c138
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 7: 7: Clause 8, page 5, line 40, leave out from ““applies”” to ““(arrangements”” in line 41 and insert ““on any occasion when arrangements under section 3(2), 5(2) or 7(3) apply to a jobholder”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, I shall speak also to the other...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c138
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, for this amendment and hope to satisfy him that it is not necessary. Specifically he asked about percentages on opt-outs. The research done to date—and this is an ongoing programme which we will also discuss later—including whether people would participate or...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c141-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was not looking for a cheer—well, perhaps I was. If the Government do not come forward with further amendments at Third Reading, and I do not guarantee that we will, then we would certainly recognise the right of the Opposition to do so. I do not want...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c127-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, for his kind remarks at the start of his speech on the amendments and for the manner in which he introduced them. I am afraid that I cannot accept them, but I hope that on the way I can give him...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c131-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I again thank the noble Baroness for raising this issue and for originally prompting us on it in Committee. On her specific question about the proportion of schemes that are dealt with under relief at source rather than net pay arrangements, I do not have those data but...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c136
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall live to regret having made that remark. I shall blame it on officials because I religiously read the notes that they put in front of me. Tax relief on pension savings forms a valuable part of the incentive to save. Individuals who save at the new...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c136-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness for the constructive way in which the amendment was moved, and I thank other noble Lords who have spoken. We share the desire to prevent levelling down and to do all that we can to ensure that existing good-quality schemes remain and flourish....

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c127
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry to interrupt the noble Lord, but I did not say that. I said that we appreciate that, as statutory instruments are necessarily rather technical documents, employers may not want to engage directly with the legislation to learn about the penalty regime. That is precisely the...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c171
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendment gives us the opportunity to touch upon transparency, which is at its heart. We agree that it is crucial for employers to be aware of penalty levels and how the regime operates. That is why we are setting out the actual penalty levels and structure of...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c170-1
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 35: 35: Clause 31, page 16, line 8, leave out ““the rules of”” On Question, amendment agreed to. Clause 39 [Fixed penalty notices]:

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c166
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 34: 34: Clause 29, page 14, line 42, leave out ““rules”” On Question, amendment agreed to. Clause 31 [Power of trustees to modify by resolution]:

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c166
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord for raising this matter and for giving us the chance to discuss the important issue of the penalty regime. As is common with other penalty regimes, we have set the maximum penalty ceilings in the Bill, with details of the regime...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c168-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment would allow the Secretary of State to vary the transitional phasing period for different employers. This power already exists in the Bill. While Clause 28 sets out specific arrangements for phasing, moving from 1 per cent to 3 per cent employer contributions over two transitional periods...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c164-5
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 27: 27: Clause 23, page 12, line 5, at end insert— ““( ) Section 13(1) (qualifying earnings) applies for the purposes of this section as if the reference to a pay reference period were a reference to a tax year.”” On Question, amendment agreed to. Clause 26...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c163
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are pretty much where we were when we discussed the matter in Committee. We are consulting and, when we look at the total costs of the scheme, there will be issues to discuss around procurement before funding arrangements become clear. Knowing more fully what is involved, we...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2008
Reference
704 c165-6
House
House of Lords