Skip to main content

1-20 of 39 results for subject:Jobcentres

Member X
John McDonnell

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
McDonnell, John (39)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, which categories of claimants had their contact with work coaches reduced in the last 12 months.

Asked by
John McDonnell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 November 2023
Reference
3078
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the Autumn Statement 2022, published on 17 November 2022, whether his Department has informed in-work claimants of Universal Credit that they will be required to meet with work coaches.

Asked by
John McDonnell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 December 2022
Reference
96545
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the Autumn Statement 2022, published on 17 November 2022, whether his Department plans to recruit additional work coaches to deal with the increased caseload of Universal Credit claimants.

Asked by
John McDonnell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 December 2022
Reference
96546
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr Speaker. I apologise to Members for delaying the debate, but this is the first opportunity I have had to do this, and it has to be done promptly after the event itself.

Yesterday, I was on a Statutory Instrument Committee dealing with a Department for...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Points of order
Date
21 April 2022
Reference
712 c350
House
House of Commons

That this House notes the decision of the Department for Work and Pensions to considerably increase face-to-face services in job centres across the UK without formal consultation with trade unions; is concerned that the Department for Work and Pensions has failed to conduct adequate risk assessments in advance of the...

Primary sponsor
Chris Stephens (Scottish National Party)
Type
Early day motions
Date
18 May 2021
Reference
59
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what definition he uses for (a) expectations for sanctions referrals and (b) targets for Jobcentre Plus staff.

Asked by
John McDonnell (Labour)
Answering body
Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 January 2014
Reference
183945; 574 c367W
House
House of Commons

(3) which organisations Jobcentre Plus have encouraged to co-locate with its branches at (a) London Heathrow, (b) London Denmark Street, (c) London Harrow Station Road, (d) Camberwell, (e) Bluewater Recruitment Centre, (f) Chelmsford Beeches Road, (g) Edinburgh City, (h) Dundee Gellatly Street, (i) Aberdeen Chapel Street, (j) Glasgow Shawlands, (k)...

Asked by
John McDonnell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 September 2011
Reference
68971; 532 c112-4W
House
House of Commons

(2) when he expects Jobcentre Plus's review of the jobcentre estate to be concluded; how many branches of Jobcentre Plus have been announced for closure as part of that review to date; what services are available from each branch announced for closure; and on what date each branch will close;

Asked by
John McDonnell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 September 2011
Reference
68970; 532 c112-4W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) what estimate he has made of the potential savings to the public purse arising from the closure of Jobcentre Plus branches at (a) London Heathrow, (b) London Denmark Street, (c) London Harrow Station Road, (d) Camberwell, (e) Bluewater Recruitment...

Asked by
John McDonnell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 September 2011
Reference
68917; 532 c112-4W
House
House of Commons

That this House notes with concern the Jobcentre Plus announcement of the closure of five contact centres at Caerphilly, Clydebank, Grimsby, Liverpool and Preston and 17 benefit processing centres in Arbroath, Ayr, Broadstairs, Cannock, Carlisle, Castleford, Chester, Exeter, Halifax, Hartlepool, Huyton, Lincoln, Luton, Mansfield, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Southampton and Yeovil; further notes...

Primary sponsor
Kate Green (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
13 May 2011
Reference
1808
House
House of Commons

I do not know why my hon. Friend is dismissive, quite honestly. We have engaged in a fruitful debate until now. If a person declines a job, sanctions are available under the existing system. This provision introduces a sanction that forces people to work for their benefits. That is what...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c820-1
House
House of Commons

The Government's scheme is called "work for your benefit", so I think that it can be translated into a requirement to work to receive benefit. I commend the schemes that my hon. Friend has recommended, which are voluntary schemes.

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c819
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend give way?

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c820
House
House of Commons

I wholeheartedly share my hon. Friend's views on incentivisation—we have discussed that—and on sanctions not working. They not only do not work, but they are counter-productive at times. Most of us have seen—particularly through the asylum regime—that not only are they driving people into absolute poverty in some instances, but...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c814
House
House of Commons

This is the removal of the younger rate.

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c786
House
House of Commons

There is an argument that the Government, taking a very short-sighted approach, may well want to do exactly that—drive down the headcount. They may try to look at the issue as a cuts exercise, or a reduction-of-expenditure exercise, and dress it up as a way of increasing performance and getting...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c802-3
House
House of Commons

We are aware of some comparisons of wage rates, which are considerably lower in the private sector. We are also aware of the high turnover of staff in the private sector, which is possibly a result of the management style, but also a result of conditions of work and wage...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c803-4
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for his intervention, and I want to come on to that. I have trawled the different pieces of research the Department has undertaken to find evidence for developing this policy and establishing its potential success. I have been trying to discover the genesis of the...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c795-6
House
House of Commons

I think the Bill introduces sanctions that, as we all know from our weekly advice surgeries, are usually applied against the most vulnerable and confused and those who live the most chaotic lives. In addition, they introduce a stigma to the process: under this Bill, support, advice and assistance are...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c794-5
House
House of Commons

This is a large group of amendments and new clauses, some of which I shall wish to press to a vote. I shall deal with them in a bureaucratic fashion, for which I apologise. The first block consists of amendments 11 to 14 and amendment 16, which seek to make...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c793-4
House
House of Commons