Skip to main content

1-20 of 68 results for subject:Marriage

Member X
Lord Mackay of Clashfern

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Mackay of Clashfern, Lord (68)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, to what extent does the right to practise one’s religion, subject to a proviso, affect the right to maintenance and property during marriage and on divorce or separation?

Asked by
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2020
Reference
804 c556
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I take part in the debate because a gentleman in Northern Ireland asked me to do so. As your Lordships know, I was responsible for the judicial system in Northern Ireland when it was extremely difficult because the danger to life for people accepting office was very real....

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2019
Reference
800 cc265-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I strongly support the view that what we need is a devolved Government in Northern Ireland. Paying attention to items that separate us is very detrimental to making progress. On the items that the noble Lord, Lord Empey, has cited, perhaps reliable legislation is not quite so important...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2019
Reference
799 cc268-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I also very much support that, as well as what the noble Lord, Lord Brennan, said. It is not so much a matter of particular legal qualification, but it is a fact that this is a very important

aspect of how people feel about the legislation. As the...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2019
Reference
799 cc283-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have put my name to Amendment 16 with a good deal of consideration. First, when the Bill was introduced by the Government, it was absolutely plain that its scope did not embrace either same-sex marriage or the abortion provisions. In that situation, it was also introduced as...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2019
Reference
799 cc321-2
House
House of Lords

I sincerely hope that that will not happen: that is the reason we have put it on the basis of the majority being in favour of the change. If we were to ask them and they were against it, that would be a real slap in the face for devolution....

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2019
Reference
799 c322
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord will of course have in mind that the Assembly voted in favour of same-sex marriage. However, that is singled out, simply because the Assembly voted against it before. Therefore, if we are to respect devolution, in view of the suggestions that things have changed completely, it should...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2019
Reference
799 c327
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my intention is to speak about Clause 4 only and the legal situation which is the background to it. I am taking no position on the substantive issues which underlie the clause, but it is quite clear that the intention of those who promoted the Motion put to...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2018
Reference
793 cc1233-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in this country we are privileged to enjoy extensive freedoms, particularly freedom of religion. However, the freedom of religion must accompany the freedom to change one’s religion. It is extremely important that the kind of oppression that comes from the establishments in religion trying to prevent their followers...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2017
Reference
778 cc896-7
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Mackay of Clashfern

1: Clause 1, page 1, line 5, at end insert “and shall be referred to as “marriage (same sex couples)”.

( ) Marriage between opposite sex couples shall be referred to as “marriage (opposite sex couples)”.”

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2013
Reference
747 cc11-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I should first declare an interest. I am the honorary president of the Scottish Bible Society and a member of various Christian groups. I have also been for quite a long time a member of Barnardo’s, which has a certain amount of interest in this area of the...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2013
Reference
747 cc12-4
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord said that the two types of marriage are to have exactly the same consequences. I think I heard him correctly.

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2013
Reference
747 c19
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord will be able to say which of my amendments in any way detracts from that. I understood him to say in his earlier submission that there was no difference in consequence. There is a very vital difference in consequence in this respect: a child born to a...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2013
Reference
747 c19
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am obliged to all those who have taken part in this debate, whether supporting or opposing my amendment. It is interesting to hear what people have to say. I quite understand that the noble Lord, Lord Alli, does not like the brackets, but they have been put...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2013
Reference
747 cc34-5
House
House of Lords

Exactly, the choice exists. We have chosen—I want to make it clear that we have chosen—to embrace both in our definition of marriage because that is what I am doing. The idea that my noble friend Lord Lester suggested, that I preferred one to the other or said that one...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2013
Reference
747 c35
House
House of Lords

Tabled by

Lord Mackay of Clashfern

2: Clause 1, page 1, line 6, leave out “The marriage of a same sex couple” and insert “A marriage (same sex couple)”

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2013
Reference
747 c35
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I give notice that, following that vote, I will not move a large number of other amendments in my name.

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2013
Reference
747 c35
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I put my name to this amendment too. I do not think that the fact that it is a public office is a distinction that is important. The important thing is that the law is changed after somebody has taken a job, and that law affects the conscientious...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2013
Reference
747 c44
House
House of Lords

Yes, I certainly am. This is a correct elucidation of the situation and I am very grateful to the Government for accepting the point that something required to be done.

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2013
Reference
747 c141
House
House of Lords

My Lords, some provisions which appear fairly late in the Sexual Offences Act would have sufficed as a definition, but there is a point to be made about the distinction between the grounds in same-sex marriage and those in opposite-sex marriage. Adultery is mentioned in particular in relation to unreasonable...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2013
Reference
747 c143
House
House of Lords