Skip to main content

1-4 of 4 results for subject:Self-assessment

Member X
Lord Lucas

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Lucas, Lord (4)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I am extremely grateful to my noble friend for that comprehensive and helpful reply. I shall not trade blows with him on matters to do with welfare, as I am merely an extremely junior acolyte at his feet. This has been a fascinating debate for me and I...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
719 c1250-1
House
House of Lords

Moved By To move to resolve that this House regrets that the Social Security (Claims and Payments) Amendment (No. 2) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/870) have been based on an inadequate design which will be unable to produce reliable evidence. Relevant documents: 17th Report, Session 2009–10, from the Merits Committee.

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
719 c1237
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by thanking my noble friend Lord Freud for turning up to respond to this Motion. The instrument that I am praying against is not of his genesis and if I get hot under the collar I hope he will accept that I am not aiming at...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
719 c1237-9
House
House of Lords

Social Security (Claims and Payments) Amendment (No. 2) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/870). Lords debate on a motion that the House regrets the Regulations have been based on inadequate design which will be unable to produce reliable evidence. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Lucas
Answering member
Lord Freud
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
719 c1237-51
House
House of Lords