Skip to main content

1-20 of 51 results for subject:Scotland

Member X
Lord Lloyd of Berwick

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I imagine that most of your Lordships have some experience of the procedure for taking children into care, probably more experience than I have. For those who have no such experience, perhaps I should say a few words of explanation.

We are concerned with the interaction of two sections...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 December 2013
Reference
750 cc1161-3
House
House of Lords

The noble and learned Lord will not have overlooked paragraph 17 of the report, which explains the important distinction between the Government’s immediate concern that they should continue for five years and the long-term issue of the fixed-term Parliament.

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c788
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for the noble and learned Lord's intervention, but he is ignoring the crucial distinction between the two issues. One is the issue as to what this Government are going to do. He accepts as we all accept that this Government can choose 2015 if they want. The...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c783
House
House of Lords

I certainly had not read the report, which I read carefully, as having drawn the distinction that I am seeking to draw between what this Government are going to do now and what future Governments should do. I had certainly not understood the report as suggesting that the committee would...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c784-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support four years rather than five years for the reasons which I spelt out in Committee and to which I had intended to return when we reached Amendment 3, but maybe I should address that a little earlier in view of certain observations made by the noble...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c782-3
House
House of Lords

I will make a brief speech since I have put my name to the amendment. In the course of his reply at Second Reading, the noble and learned Lord, Lord Wallace of Tankerness, described the question now before the Committee as ““the key issue””. He went to on to say...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c479-80
House
House of Lords

Can the noble Lord comment on the point that all the experts who gave evidence, both in the House of Lords committee and in the House of Commons, came down in favour of four years? These were experts on our constitution, both in law and in practice.

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c502
House
House of Lords

I shall answer on the noble and learned Lord’s behalf. The evidence given to the Power commission was clearly in favour of more elections rather than fewer, not more than four years apart.

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c513
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, support this amendment, and I am very glad to follow the noble Lord, Lord Newton, with all his lengthy experience of how the council actually works and how much good it has done over the past 10 years and, indeed, for far longer. I add something...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2010
Reference
722 c1326-8
House
House of Lords

On that last point, I find it very difficult—perhaps the noble Lord could deal with this—to reconcile that argument with the fact that the tribunal is contained in the same act. There was no suggestion that the council was to come to an end when the Tribunals Service took effect—not...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2010
Reference
722 c1334
House
House of Lords

Having had a glance at the hour, I shall be very brief. I say at once that I do not intend to divide the House. The Conservatives have said that, if they win the election, they will carry out a review of control orders as part of a wider review...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
718 c1564
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to support the measure proposed by the noble Baroness. She referred to the observations of the Minister in the other place in which he said that to include the under-18s in the 2009 Bill would have involved a major change in the relationship between the civil...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
718 c1557-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in his opening speech, the Minister dealt at length with fingerprints and the retention of DNA samples, covered by Clauses 1 to 28 of the Bill. He was right to do so because they are clearly matters of great importance. However, I will confine myself to two matters...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2010
Reference
718 c1238-41
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Baroness. I wonder whether, with all her knowledge of this subject, she could give us some idea of when the implementation committee is likely to report.

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2009
Reference
713 c724
House
House of Lords

I was not quite sure which amendment we were on. However, if we are on what has been called the forum amendment, at this stage I certainly found the arguments that the noble and learned Baroness the Attorney-General advanced in the memorandum completely convincing—particularly, the arguments on the second bullet...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2009
Reference
713 c603
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when I spoke in the debate on the Queen’s Speech in December last year, I pointed out, as many others had already done, that we had had five major criminal justice Bills in as many years. I thought then that this year was going to prove the exception...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c1248-50
House
House of Lords

I, too, was surprised to find Clause 50 tucked away in the Bill so soon after the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill received Royal Assent in 2007. A key feature of the Act was that asylum and immigration cases were excluded from the operation of Section 19, so that High...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
708 c795-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am unable to make any contribution to Parts 1, 2 and 3 of the Bill; my only reason for seeking to speak at Second Reading is my concern about Clause 50. I therefore concede at once that I do not deserve such a high place as I...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2009
Reference
707 c1140-2
House
House of Lords

moved, as an amendment to Amendment No. 6, Amendment No. 7: 7: Clause 23, line 13, after ““to”” insert— ““(i)”” The noble and learned Lord said: My Lords, the House may have gathered from what the Minister has said that in Committee there was no support for the Government’s proposals...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2008
Reference
705 c172-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord and beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2008
Reference
705 c169
House
House of Lords