Skip to main content

1-10 of 10 results for subject:VAT

Member X
Chris Leslie
Subject X
Devolved matters

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Leslie, Chris (10)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Devolved matters (10)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Absolutely. Of course that is the case. It is so obvious that it is surprising that Conservative Members cannot see it. What is worse is that the new clause that they have moved—or rather, that one of them has moved—would cost more than £4 billion. It would cost £4.1 billion...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
530 c874
House
House of Commons

I apologise for interrupting the hon. Lady's flow, but this is really quite important. Did she or did she not say ““not moved”” at the beginning of the debate on new clause 5?

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
530 c851
House
House of Commons

Well, why not? More from the hon. Gentleman.

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
530 c874
House
House of Commons

There could be, who knows? We had the unedifying spectacle, at the beginning of the debate, of the hon. Member for Congleton (Fiona Bruce), in whose name the new clause was tabled, not moving it, and the hon. Member for Gainsborough (Mr Leigh) swiftly getting to his feet and deciding...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
530 c873
House
House of Commons

I am not quite sure what the hon. Gentleman's point is. Maybe in the cool light of day that intervention will have more light shed on it. In his contribution earlier, he asserted that there was a causal link between marriage and the socio-economic well-being of society, child well-being and...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
530 c874
House
House of Commons

This is the final intervention that I will take.

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
530 c875
House
House of Commons

What on earth is going on with the Tories this evening? It is a perplexing situation, because Conservative Members usually accuse Labour Members of filibustering in an open-ended Finance Bill debate, but not at all this evening. Instead we seem to have a private family dispute breaking out.

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
530 c873
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman could have speeded that up by not intervening. I shall finish by saying that, clearly, there are major problems with the transferable allowance. It is costly and not targeted, and it is unfair to those without a marriage certificate, whether they are divorced, widowed, single or in...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
530 c875-6
House
House of Commons

I know that many of my hon. Friends would like to me to elucidate some of that history, but we have already been through various centuries in this evening's debate. Suffice it to say that it was a Conservative Government who eventually phased out the married couple's allowance, and indeed...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
530 c874-5
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. I do not wish in any way to dispute the hon. Lady's version of events, but I am quite sure that I distinctly heard her—maybe the official record will show this—say ““not moved”” when she was asked about new clause 5. Am...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
530 c850
House
House of Commons