Skip to main content

1-20 of 158 results for subject:Accountability

Member X
Ruth Kelly

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Kelly, Ruth (158)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I, too, agree that it is important that we have correct and reasonable fare increases for individual journeys. That is why we have capped regulated fares at 1 per cent. above the rate of inflation for individual franchises over the period in question. If the hon. Lady took the trouble...

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c174-5
House
House of Commons

I understand the genuine concerns expressed by the hon. Gentleman, and I, like him, sympathise with all the passengers who suffered disruption on the network over the Christmas and new year period. It is easy to say in the House that fines are no incentive for Network Rail. It is...

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c170
House
House of Commons

Yes, but I must then make progress.

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c172
House
House of Commons

I can confirm that the rail regulator has told me that he will also take into consideration the engineering overruns at Shields Junction.

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c172
House
House of Commons

I think I might know what the right hon. Gentleman's solution is: to revert to a situation in which, rather than being accountable to a membership board, Network Rail is more concerned with paying dividends to private shareholders, and in which Government investment, far from increasing—as it is, by £10...

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c172
House
House of Commons

I have made two points absolutely clear. First, bonus setting is not for the Government; it is not my role as Secretary of State for Transport to set the bonuses of Network Rail's management. However, I sympathise with those who, understandably, feel angry about the delays and overruns in the...

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c172-3
House
House of Commons

That is one of the issues we need to consider. Indeed, the Office of Rail Regulation will examine the impact that that disruption had on passengers. There are clear arrangements in place under which compensation can be paid to train operating companies and, under the passenger's charter, to passengers, if...

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c174
House
House of Commons

I would be surprised if the hon. Gentleman were not aware that we have firm, costed plans that are delivering within the 2009 to 2014 period. In those costed plans, we have said that there will be no line closures and that we will monitor the growth in passenger numbers...

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c173
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes an excellent point. Indeed, I am still not clear about the fares policy of the hon. Member for Chipping Barnet. If she disagrees with what passengers are being asked to pay, would she and her party expect the taxpayer to pay more instead, or would they...

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c174
House
House of Commons

Indeed not, and I beg the hon. Lady to wait for the rest of my speech. Before I tackle head-on the issues that she raised, I, too, welcome the hon. Member for Lewes (Norman Baker) to his place on the Front Bench. I look forward to his contribution, both to...

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c168-9
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for his question. I travelled on the west coast main line only a few days ago and I, too, experienced a comfortable, reliable journey, which took two and a quarter hours from London to Manchester. The performance of the rail network has improved so considerably...

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c169
House
House of Commons

The point I am making is that it is important that the full lessons are learned from the episode. The failures call into question whether the processes put in place by Network Rail to manage engineering works over the Christmas and new year period were adequate. I can tell the...

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c169
House
House of Commons

I entirely agree. As I intend to amplify later in my speech, the idea that accountability or lack of accountability for the rail structure is a cause or potential cause of the engineering overruns is ludicrous. Those are separate questions that need to be addressed separately. It is right that...

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c169-70
House
House of Commons

I completely agree. The hon. Member for Chipping Barnet should not be proud of the record of her party when it was in government... I shall give way to my hon. Friend and then to the right hon. Gentleman.

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c171
House
House of Commons

I am astounded by the fact that the hon. Lady is claiming that we have a public ownership structure for Network Rail, when she is not aware, as my hon. Friend the Member for Crewe and Nantwich (Mrs. Dunwoody) set out to the House, what the accountability of Network Rail...

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c170
House
House of Commons

Certainly, if the results of the investigation by the Office of Rail Regulation suggest that Network Rail is in breach of its licence, has been in breach of its licence or is likely to be in breach of its licence in future, that would need to be taken into account...

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c170
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, To leave out from ““House”” to the end of the Question, and to add instead thereof:"““applauds the Government for taking decisive action to correct the flaws of rail privatisation; welcomes the fact that the railway is carrying 40 per cent. more passengers and 47 per cent....

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c168
House
House of Commons

I certainly accept my hon. Friend's point. It is right that the Opposition should wake up to the fact that there are only two real sources of funding for the railways: the taxpayer or the fare payer. If the hon. Member for Chipping Barnet is proposing that fares should be...

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c175
House
House of Commons

I have no need to join the hon. Gentleman on his commuter journey. However, I can tell the House that I am committed to more capacity on our railways, to ensuring that the necessary investment goes in and to protecting passengers from rail fare increases through a cap on regulated...

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c175
House
House of Commons

Regulated fares have not risen in real terms since 1997. There have been some increases, especially in open first-class and premium fares, but 80 per cent. of people travel on a regulated or, indeed, discounted ticket... If the hon. Gentleman will forgive me, I must make progress. It is essential...

Member
Ruth Kelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
470 c175
House
House of Commons