Skip to main content

1-20 of 49 results for subject:Liability

Member X
Lord James of Blackheath

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
James of Blackheath, Lord (49)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I have indicated previously the impact that forced migration has had upon my family. We had in the Queen’s Speech a Bill for dealing with the abuse of children and the intention to bring forward better controls over trafficking. Those are closely connected. This country has a terrible...

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2014
Reference
754 cc206-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I had not expected to rise at this stage of the debate but, having listened to the noble Lord, Lord Howarth, I feel compelled to do so on behalf of the insurance industry, as he has made a serious allegation of fundamental dishonesty within it. I remind the...

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2013
Reference
747 cc1053-5
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for that. I hope that he will appreciate that my concern was that I did not want to start the forthcoming Session by doing the perp walk down the middle of a 747 on an extradition order back to the USA.

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2013
Reference
747 c1055
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the sole purpose of this amendment is to make sure that we do not lose track of the very important but parallel issue of asbestosis that affects members of the fighting services. I remind noble Lords of the amendments made some six years ago by the former Government...

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2013
Reference
747 cc849-850
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before the Minister replies, I should like to return to a point that came up in Committee and to try to set the industry context in which these misunderstandings, particularly those of the noble Lord, Lord Browne, are occurring. I should declare my interests. I was an elected...

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2013
Reference
747 c819
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord James of Blackheath

28: After Clause 16, insert the following new Clause—

“Establishing additional schemes

The Secretary of State shall by regulation establish another scheme in relation to long-latency asbestos-related diseases in current and retired members of the Armed Forces.”

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2013
Reference
747 c849
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for that. I hope I made clear the distinction that I am looking at this matter from an insurance industry point of view; namely, that asbestosis covered everything and that six years ago we inadvertently disadvantaged the Armed Forces so severely that we have put...

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2013
Reference
747 c850
House
House of Lords

I am talking about the sufferers and the industry.

9.45 pm

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2013
Reference
747 c851
House
House of Lords

I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2013
Reference
747 c851
House
House of Lords

I will make one small comment about subsection (2) of the new clause proposed by Amendment 32: there are no longer any active insurers for asbestosis. You are really talking about the reinsurers. They are the people you should seek to have represented.

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2013
Reference
745 c301GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the problems of the Navy in this regard persist for that service. An MoD meeting has been called for 10 o’clock tomorrow morning. Will the Minister be present at that meeting? It would be helpful to know that.

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2013
Reference
745 c308GC
House
House of Lords

I think it will be harder to make progress without the Minister. It seems to me that three very significant problems are emerging in any dialogue with the MoD at present, and they will not go away very easily. Each of them has been shadowed in the discussions this afternoon....

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2013
Reference
745 cc308-9GC
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may ask the Minister if he will have a meeting with me after I have been to the MoD so that I can get his advice and guidance on what to do next?

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2013
Reference
745 c310GC
House
House of Lords

Can we have an indication by paw of who will be attending the meeting?

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2013
Reference
745 c312GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is taking a big risk in sending the best looking member of his staff to the Navy.

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2013
Reference
745 c312GC
House
House of Lords

The provisional estimate is up to 300 dead already and 180 contaminated. However, the figure we need to be concerned about is the number of wives who have got it, too.

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2013
Reference
745 c313GC
House
House of Lords

For the sake of accuracy, I will just correct the figures to this extent. The Navy’s figures include subcontracted staff in naval ports.

6.30 pm

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2013
Reference
745 c314GC
House
House of Lords

I might be able to ease the noble Lord’s concern on this. I believe that when the major reinsurances were written, they were limited as to the dates when an infection was identified and the reinsurance applied only to the names of those who had a registered claim at that...

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2013
Reference
745 c317GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before I comment on what the noble Lord, Lord Howarth, said, I declare my interests. I was an elected member of the council of Lloyd’s throughout its entire rescue period; I was chairman of the audit committee of Lloyd’s of London; and I was chairman of the committee...

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2013
Reference
745 cc212-3GC
House
House of Lords

If the noble Lord will forgive me, the state does not have a liability because it pulled the dirtiest trick of all time when it repealed the 1947 Act and effectively put people in a Catch-22 situation where they could only claim if they had already been identified with the...

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2013
Reference
745 c221GC
House
House of Lords