Skip to main content

1-20 of 285 results for subject:Pollution

Member X
Lord Howard of Lympne

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Howard of Lympne, Lord (285)
More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, this is not a debate about the integrity of Mr Dominic Grieve, and I shall do my very best to avoid mentioning his name again. It is a debate on the terms of the amendments before your Lordships’ House this afternoon. My noble friend the Leader made a...

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2018
Reference
791 c1892
House
House of Lords

I will give way when I have finished my sentence. The very purpose of the amendment put forward by the noble Viscount can be achieved without its passing.

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2018
Reference
791 c1892
House
House of Lords

The operative phrase in the noble Baroness’s observation was “the chances are”. I believe that, if the House of Commons wished to consider the amendment in the terms put forward by the noble Viscount, it would be able to do so.

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2018
Reference
791 c1893
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that I disagree with my noble friend. As we know, the Speaker of the House of Commons is very eager these days to allow all sorts of amendments to be put.

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2018
Reference
791 c1893
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness said “the chances are”; that was the operative phrase in her remarks.

It is often said in our debates that the purpose of the amendment put forward is to give the other place the opportunity to think again. It is a powerful argument, which has influenced many of...

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2018
Reference
791 c1893
House
House of Lords

What action he has taken to reduce the release of red list substances into rivers. (Failed OPQ)

Asked by
Robert B Jones (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 April 1993
Reference
223 c427W;223 c423W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 April 1993
Reference
223 c957;223 c955
House
House of Commons

What discussions he has had with the National Rivers Authority and British Coal regarding the potential pollution of the River Wear likely to be caused by the cessation of pumping after the closure of Easington and Vane Tempest collieries. (Failed OPQ)

Asked by
Chris Mullin (Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 April 1993
Reference
223 c429W;223 c425W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 April 1993
Reference
223 c946;223 c944-5
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 April 1993
Reference
223 c957-8;223 c955-6
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 April 1993
Reference
223 c957;223 c955
House
House of Commons
How many bathing waters were designated by Her Majesty's Govt for the purposes of the 1975 EC bathing waters directive by May 1979.
Asked by
Michael Brown (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
28 April 1993
Reference
223 c957;223 c955
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 April 1993
Reference
223 c958;223 c956
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 April 1993
Reference
223 c958;223 c956
House
House of Commons

Statement on the outcome of the Environment Council on 22nd and 23rd March.

Asked by
Anthony Durant (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 March 1993
Reference
221 c737-9W
House
House of Commons

Statement on consultative proposals for local authorities in England and Wales to set up statutory registers of contaminated uses of land under section 143 of the Environmental Protection Act of 1990. - Inc fact that HMG is placing in the Library a list of respondents, withdrawing its proposals for establishing...

Asked by
Warren Hawksley (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 March 1993
Reference
221 c633-4W
House
House of Commons

How he intends to ensure that environmental considerations are in future taken into account in establishing rules for the maritime transport of oil. (Failed OPQ)

Asked by
Lord Jones (Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 January 1993
Reference
217 c766W;217 c761W
House
House of Commons

How he intends to ensure that environmental considerations are in future taken into account in establishing rules for maritime transport of oil. (Failed OPQ)

Asked by
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 January 1993
Reference
217 c766W;217 c761W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 January 1993
Reference
217 c1030-1;217 c1032-3
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 January 1993
Reference
217 c1030-1;217 c1032-3
House
House of Commons