Skip to main content

1-9 of 9 results for subject:Taxation

Member X
Lord Howard of Rising
Subject X
Competition

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Howard of Rising, Lord (9)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Competition (9)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I wish that I had a pound note for every time the Minister has told me that he agrees with me but does nothing about it. I thank him for his explanation. Expectations may be in the code, but that does not mean that they will not be...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c505-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment is simple. It states that if the code is not followed, there should be an explanation of why it has not been followed. Her Majesty's Government strongly argued that the code should not be legally binding. While I do not agree with that argument, it is...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c504-5
House
House of Lords

Amendment 11 11: Clause 5, page 4, line 6, at end insert ““and if the authorities do not follow the code in any particular instance they must publish as soon as practicable an explanation of why they have not done so””

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c504
House
House of Lords

Amendment 4 4: Clause 4, page 3, line 25, at end insert— ““( ) Objective 6 is to avoid the distortion of competition.””

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c492
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendment is to ensure that in the event of the powers of the special resolution regime being used, a bank which comes under the regime will not take unfair advantage over the competition. When this matter was debated in Committee, we did not have the benefit of...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c492
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his remarks. However, his endeavours have not been very successful as I am not reassured. He mentioned the FSA, but the FSA is not responsible for competition; as far as I know, that is the Office of Fair Trading. If competition issues were...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c494
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 5 gives recognition to the interests of creditors and shareholders. This is a more modest amendment than those discussed in Committee. At that time, the Minister pointed out that objective 5 set out in Clause 4(8), referring to the Human Rights Act, gave adequate protection so an...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c494-5
House
House of Lords

Amendment 5 5: Clause 4, page 3, line 27, at end insert— ““( ) In addition to the objectives set out in this section, the relevant authorities shall also have regard so far as it is practicable to the interests of creditors and shareholders.””

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c494
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Newby, for his support for the amendment. I do not see how the amendment could be construed as confusing. The Minister repeated the same arguments and I am afraid that they are no more convincing this time around than they were the...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c496
House
House of Lords