Skip to main content

1-14 of 14 results for subject:Elections

Member X
Baroness Henig
Subject X
Security

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Henig, Baroness (14)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Security (14)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, in moving Amendment 117 I shall speak also to Amendments 144, 148, 149, 150, 154, 156, 232 and 232A. Amendment 117 confers specific functions for complaints, conduct and audit matters on panels and obliges each panel to establish an independent sub-committee to discharge these functions. It also makes...

Member
Baroness Henig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
729 c529-33
House
House of Lords

117: After Clause 29, insert the following new Clause— ““Functions of police and crime panels: conduct, complaints and audit committees (1) Every police and crime panel shall— (a) deal with complaints and conduct matters in relation to the police and crime commissioner and members of the police and crime panel;...

Member
Baroness Henig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
729 c528-9
House
House of Lords

I have just been reading Schedule 7. As I said, it has an element of laissez-faire about it. If the Government agree about the issues and believe that they are as important as I believe they are, what is the problem with explicitly putting them in the Bill? I cannot...

Member
Baroness Henig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
729 c538
House
House of Lords

I seek genuine clarification from the Minister. She referred to the schedule that states that the balanced appointment objective means that the political make-up of a relevant authority has to be represented on the panel. That means that in some parts of the country—Manchester, let us say—all the political representation...

Member
Baroness Henig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
729 c495
House
House of Lords

The problem is that I certainly, speaking for myself, do not fully understand the extent of the concession. Without being able to see the evidence that the Minister is talking about and to compare the former list and the present list under the amendment with old police authorities, I cannot...

Member
Baroness Henig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
729 c498
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is an extremely serious issue. It first raised its head at Second Reading when nearly all the speakers voiced their anxieties about party politics being put into policing and it is a theme that has run right through our discussions since that time. I accept the assurance...

Member
Baroness Henig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
729 c499-500
House
House of Lords

The problem for me is that this is like justice; it must not only be done but be seen to be done. Not only must we have high standards and regulations, but the public must be convinced, and must see, that they are there and that they are explicit in...

Member
Baroness Henig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
729 c539
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have suddenly realised that some days ago I moved an amendment, did I not, about statutory protection for chief executives, and withdrew it because the noble Baroness would not give me any assurances on this. Does this not rule out any changes? I am puzzled because I...

Member
Baroness Henig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
729 c527-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have a problem with the response. This is a very big issue about public confidence. It is about putting processes in place that will reassure the public that everything is being done ethically and correctly, and that governance structures meet certain standards. I heard what the noble...

Member
Baroness Henig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
729 c538
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to Amendments 102 and 104 in the group. As my noble friend Lord Beecham said, they both deal specifically with the majority required to veto the precept, and taken together suggest that it should be a simple majority of the panel members present. I have...

Member
Baroness Henig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
729 c476-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wish to speak to Amendment 231 and Amendment 234 in this group. I hope your Lordships will have noted the balanced symmetry of my amendments, one with the Minister for the Government and the other with my noble friend Lord Hunt, leading for the loyal Opposition, so...

Member
Baroness Henig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
729 c592-4
House
House of Lords

106: Clause 29, page 20, line 30, leave out from ““panel”” to end of line 31

Member
Baroness Henig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
729 c485
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendment 116. Amendment 106 would effectively remove Schedule 6 on the composition of panels, which I seek to replace with the alternative high-level proposal set out in Amendment 116. As I indicated in Committee, the latter amendment goes to the heart of the...

Member
Baroness Henig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
729 c486-7
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I can explain to the noble Lord that that is precisely what happens at the moment. In a two-tier area such as he is describing—I am familiar with Lancashire—all the authorities have to get together and, in certain cases, agree to put forward nominations in line with the political...

Member
Baroness Henig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2011
Reference
729 c490
House
House of Lords