Skip to main content

1-20 of 45 results for subject:Arrests

Member X
Baroness Harris of Richmond

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Harris of Richmond, Baroness (45)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, it is not just 175,000 arrest records of people arrested and released without charge, is it? My noble friend Lord Paddick told us just how many offence and person records have also gone missing. Can the Minister tell us how many of these were under live investigation?

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
809 c1120
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too will be extremely brief. For many years, I have helped, supported and encouraged the British Transport Police and I remember very well the Act that went through and the concerns that we had then about what would happen if the BTP were joined with Police Scotland....

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c265
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness makes a good point and I concur with what she says. I predict that this will go horribly wrong at some point and that is a real shame. I hope that the noble Lord has listened very carefully to the views that have been clearly expressed around...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c265
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank the Minister for repeating this Statement, which does not seem to take us much further down the road from the events of last week. That is a little disappointing. There have been relationship breakdowns between power-sharing parties on and off now for a number of...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 September 2015
Reference
764 cc1762-3
House
House of Lords
My Lords, can the noble Baroness say why the Government changed their decision and dropped the proposed anonymity for those accused of rape?
Asked by
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
8 February 2011
Reference
725 c119
House
House of Lords

I again thank the Minister for his considered response, which is exactly what I expected. As we have gone through Clause 10, it has felt as though we have been flogging a dead horse. Nevertheless, I have great concerns, which have been echoed across the Committee. The Minister referred to...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c394
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for the support from the Conservative Benches. I thank the Minister for his response, which has been of a general nature. Perhaps much more debate is needed around the area of taking fingerprints and samples that are kept even if a person is not charged. The Minister...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c392
House
House of Lords

Clause 10 deals with the taking of fingerprints and non-intimate samples from those subject to control orders. As my noble friend Lady Miller of Chilthorne Domer said on Amendment No. 14, these are people who have not been through a process of law. The need to legislate specifically to allow...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c392-3
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 15: 15: Clause 10, page 7, line 5, after ““constable”” insert ““, with the authority of an officer of a rank no lower than inspector,”” The noble Baroness said: This group of amendments is intended to be probing. Clause 11 deals with the power to take fingerprints...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c389
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 17: 17: Clause 10, page 7, line 22, leave out subsection (4) The noble Baroness said: I shall speak also to Amendment No. 20. Clauses 10 and 12 deal with the power to take fingerprints and samples. I have great difficulties with Clause 10(4) and Clause 12(5),...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c390-1
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister for clarifying that position. If the clause was intended to regularise issues, perhaps we should all have been in the same boat and not had a different provision for Scotland. However, I understand the differences that he has explained for me. I will not...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c390
House
House of Lords

Once again, I am very grateful to the Minister. It is important to have that in Hansard to clarify the situation. I thank him very much and beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c402
House
House of Lords

I want to put on record, on behalf of my noble friend Lord Lester of Herne Hill who is unable to be in his place, the fact that we on these Benches very much support these amendments.

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c405
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord for his care in how he dealt with the amendment and for what he has put on record. That will go a long way in countering some of the concerns expressed. To have responses on record is a valuable way of ensuring that...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c402
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 25: 25: Clause 19, page 15, line 30, at end insert— ““( ) Nothing in this section shall require a person to disclose information to any of the intelligence services for any purpose.”” The noble Baroness said: This is simply a probing amendment to allow the Minister...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c402
House
House of Lords

I strongly support the amendment. In fact, over the many years that I have been dealing with police issues, I have always asked for the office to be of a higher rank than the Government have proposed. I have failed every time to get the Government to accept that, so...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c340
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 24: 24: Clause 19, page 15, line 25, leave out paragraphs (a) and (b) and insert ““any contractual or other obligation owed by the person making the disclosure, other than a breach of confidence.”” The noble Baroness said: The amendment would retain confidence breach as a potential...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c400
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 3: 3: Clause 1, page 2, line 8, after ““may,”” insert ““if he has reasonable grounds for believing that a document may be seized and”” The noble Baroness said: We feel a reasonableness test is appropriate here. There appears to be a blanket power for a constable...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c342
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to all noble Lords who have taken part in this mini debate on an important issue. The Minister said that there is no intention to have fishing expeditions. That is the intention. Intentions may be good, but they may also work in other ways. These powers...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c343
House
House of Lords

It does to an extent and I am grateful to the noble Lord for responding in that way and to the noble Baroness, Lady Hanham, for her support. We might need to look at this further in the light of what the Minister has said. I shall withdraw the amendment...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c339
House
House of Lords