Skip to main content

1-17 of 17 results for subject:Fingerprints

Member X
Lord Harris of Haringey

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Harris of Haringey, Lord (17)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To clarify further, presumably part of the difficulty here is that this is an inadvertent error by the police, because they have taken somebody under Section 136 to a place of safety which in this instance has turned out to be a cell in a police station. Is not the...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1503
House
House of Lords

The Minister said that an application, which has not, or may not have been exercised in Scotland, could be made when the police consider it necessary. Could he define what he thinks would be necessary under such circumstances?

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1512
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on the same point about the balance of proportionality, I am assuming that this clause is based on a detailed and careful analysis of the evidence, so perhaps the Minister could share with the House the numbers of people who are affected in terms of their DNA samples...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
734 c1508-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as a member of the Metropolitan Police Authority. I fear I may be spoiling the consensus that seems to have emerged as to what a wonderful Bill this is. This is a very grandiosely entitled Bill: ““Protection of Freedoms””, no less. I am sure...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2011
Reference
732 c203-5
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I will not rise on the next occasion you mention me. The issue about Project Champion was that people welcomed the original introduction. It was when they found out they had been misled about the purposes of the cameras that the anger—the very real and justifiable anger—arose.

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2011
Reference
732 c224
House
House of Lords

The figures I quoted were from the Home Office’s own figures, reanalysing the cases where individuals would have been taken off the database as a result of these changes and then subsequently—these are facts and involve real people—gone on to commit other crimes in 6,000 or 7,000 cases. I will...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2011
Reference
732 c223
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is it not the case that Home Office Ministers frequently visit our border posts? In the circumstances, is it not surprising that they did not visit sites where these pilots were taking place—or if they did, that they did not notice or hear from the staff concerned how...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2011
Reference
732 c42
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I first apologise to my noble friend and the House for my unavoidable late arrival, which meant that I missed some of what my noble friend had to say, although I had the benefit of discussing the Bill with him on an earlier occasion. For the record, I...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2009
Reference
711 c260-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord for making that point. It is important to draw distinctions between the different sorts of stop and search. It was not the main focus of the consultation, but a strong element that emerged from it was about the powers under Section...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2009
Reference
711 c263-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble Baroness for giving way. I am particularly interested in the point that she makes about cybercrime. Having looked at the matter extensively, I should be interested to know precisely what legislative proposals she feels could helpfully be inserted in the Bill.

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2009
Reference
711 c234-5
House
House of Lords

I was not arguing for a national database with everyone on it, although there is a debate to be had that that might be fairer and clearer for everyone. However, it is genuinely the case—I have detected this in the discussion that we have had in the Committee today—that there...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c387
House
House of Lords

I have been concerned at the tone of this debate. I apologise to the noble Baroness that I did not hear her opening remarks, but I have listened to the responses, and there seems automatically to be an assumption that holding this material in databases is necessarily damaging to liberty....

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c381
House
House of Lords

It was said, of course, to try to spare the blushes of the noble Baroness in view of my real thoughts about the amendment.

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c341
House
House of Lords

Is it not the case that, in carrying out their functions, police officers have to act reasonably and are challengeable if they do not?

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c343
House
House of Lords

I am somewhat confused by this interesting amendment and have been trying to think about the practicalities and what it would be likely to lead to. It would mean that in a complicated operation perhaps involving a number of properties and a number of officers, every time a single piece...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c340-1
House
House of Lords

The amendment as tabled could remove an important safeguard with regard to the normal process of assessing whether a document is material and should be seized should be limited, and limited to a short period, which in this case is 48 hours. The other issues raised by the noble Baroness,...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c358
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Miller, for suggesting a line of argument on this. I was not on this occasion going to oppose her amendment on the basis that it was over-bureaucratic, but, to use the words that she used earlier, because it was perhaps naive. I...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
704 c355-6
House
House of Lords