Skip to main content

1-9 of 9 results for subject:Enforcement

Member X
Lord Hanningfield
Subject X
Appeals

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Hanningfield, Lord (9)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Appeals (9)
More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the practices of local authorities in setting parking and traffic regimes, in levying penalties for violations and in the enforcement of those penalties. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Lucas
Answering member
Lord Tunnicliffe
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates
Date
15 January 2009
Reference
706 c1400-26
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank my noble friend Lord Lucas for promoting this debate. I have been on the Floor of this House for much of today. It shows the variety, uniqueness and strength of this House that we have gone from discussing Baby P and children’s processes this morning,...

Member
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2009
Reference
706 c1418-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move Amendment No. 6A, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 6, leave out ““agree”” and insert ““disagree””. We return to probably the most contentious clause in the Bill. I will keep my comments...

Member
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c338-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support everything the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, has said. Perhaps the Minister could further clarify the matter. In previous debates we have spoken of accidents, and we need to ensure that in the legislation we have properly tackled the recklessness at level crossings. I would like to...

Member
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c356
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I expected, we have had a long debate on the amendment. As I said at the beginning, it is a very contentious issue and there are some very strong feelings about it. I regret the last part of the discussion because we all know that if the...

Member
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c345-9
House
House of Lords

moved, as an amendment to the Motion that this House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 1, leave out ““agree”” and insert ““disagree””. The noble Lord said: My Lords, I shall be as brief as possible. It is interesting to note that it is exactly one year...

Member
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c322-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank noble Lords who have taken part in the debate and I thank the Minister for replying. I was hopeful that we would not be debating this issue again a year later because there were indications in newspaper speculation that the Government would do what I...

Member
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c324-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for presenting this regulation. He said that it would be a short debate, and I shall try to keep it that way as we all want to get to our Easter Recess as soon as we can. As the Minister explained in his opening remarks, the...

Member
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
680 c930-1
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on railway safety levy(SI 2006/1010). Lords debate on motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Davies of Oldham
Answering member
Lord Hanningfield
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
680 c929-34
House
House of Lords