Skip to main content

1-20 of 49 results for subject:Bridges

Member X
Lord Hammond of Runnymede

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Hammond of Runnymede, Lord (49)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

On 26 October, following the announcement of the conclusions of the spending review, I made a statement to the House outlining our plans for investing over ÂŁ1.5 billion over the next four years on major capital transport schemes promoted by local authorities. I also set out a process for deciding...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Written statements
Date
4 February 2011
Reference
522 c60-2WS
House
House of Commons

Statement on investment in transport.

Lead member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c177-98
House
House of Commons

If the fundamentals of the scheme justify its promotion to the development pool, it will be so promoted.

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c194
House
House of Commons

That is the third representation that we have had on the Coventry-Nuneaton rail upgrade this afternoon. I would be very happy to meet my hon. Friend, and may I tempt him to include Opposition Members who have an interest in this? He and they are welcome to come along and...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c194
House
House of Commons

The Swindon to Kemble project, which my hon. Friend mentions, was uniquely the only Network Rail scheme brought forward under the regional funding allocation system. It had not submitted a business case to the Department before the cut-off date of 10 June, but it is the type of scheme that...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c184
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for her comments and welcome her to the Dispatch Box. I welcome the tone of her initial remarks at least; I am sorry it degenerated a bit towards the end. I am also sorry to have to tell her that I cannot write as quickly...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c181-2
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for her remarks. I know that the Nottingham tramway is not universally popular and that the workplace parking levy is even less so. However, if we are serious about a localism agenda, we will find that sometimes, perhaps often, the things that elected...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c183
House
House of Commons

With your permission, Madam Deputy Speaker, I would like to make a statement on the Government's investment plans for our transport networks. During the course of my remarks, hon. Members might find it helpful to refer to the documents that I placed in the Library of the House and the...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c177-9
House
House of Commons

Indeed I can. As I made clear in my statement, potential for economic growth is one of the key priorities in allocating funding. I am also aware that many schemes do not have 100% support for the currently proposed solution in the communities that they serve. Where there are ideas...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c187
House
House of Commons

Both schemes to which my hon. Friend refers are in the development pool, and I urge him to urge his local authority to engage very seriously with that process, to sharpen the pencil, to think innovatively and to come back with a funding bid that puts those schemes in the...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c193
House
House of Commons

The A5-M1 link road has not been shelved: it is a scheme on which we will do further development work. From memory, the issue involves the possibility of a significant developer contribution and the building of the road will open up significant amounts of developable land. We will need to...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c194
House
House of Commons

I can safely say that any local authority that comes back with a revised bid offering less local contribution is unlikely to be looked upon favourably. The Thornton to Switch Island link is a very high value scheme, delivering staggeringly high benefits for every unit of cost, but even so...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c193
House
House of Commons

Dear, dear, it must be my ears again. I did not hear the hon. Lady mention the Leeds station southern access scheme, which has been approved—[Interruption] If I may say so to the hon. Lady, when one's constituency is in a city, I think one will find that the effects...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c191
House
House of Commons

Where local authorities wish to impose workplace parking levies, they need the Secretary of State's approval under current legislation. It is, of course, up to local authorities to promote such schemes if they feel that they are appropriate for their areas, but I have said recently that I would expect...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c191
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend might have slightly misunderstood the pre-qualification pool. It is not that the Kingskerswell bypass does not meet the value for money criteria; it is that the Department does not have an up-to-date appraisal of the scheme. It will therefore now carry out a rapid assessment in which...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c192
House
House of Commons

I understand that my ministerial colleagues are aware of the scheme to which the hon. Gentleman refers and are actively looking at it, but it is the Supertram additional vehicles scheme that has been included in the development pool. If it is clear that there are synergies from linking this...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c192
House
House of Commons

Access to York park and ride is included in that group of schemes. As I announced earlier, we intend to take decisions on which of those schemes will be funded by the end of 2011. We will work proactively with the local authorities sponsoring those schemes from now, and we...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c191-2
House
House of Commons

I assure the hon. Gentleman that all schemes will be objectively appraised and that I do not always take the word of my officials; I ask to see the underlying data and business case, and I shall continue to do so.

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c186
House
House of Commons

Travel times and potential journey savings are one of the key factors that the current model takes into account. The M54-M6 toll link is in the group of schemes that will be reassessed, because the Department needs to reassure itself that the value-for-money case for the scheme still applies.

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c186
House
House of Commons

Transport funding in Yorkshire and the Humber is now about average, although I accept the comments that my hon. Friend has made about historical levels of funding. The two schemes to which he referred will not be funded during the current spending review period but they will continue to be...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
517 c185
House
House of Commons