Skip to main content

1-20 of 22 results for subject:"EU law"

Member X
Lord Deben
Subject X
Powers

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Deben, Lord (22)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Powers (22)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I was opposed to that referendum, as I have always been opposed to referenda. I am absolutely consistent on that matter, whether they were favourable or unfavourable.

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2011
Reference
728 c635
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I find this a fascinating amendment because those of us who are opposed to referenda in any case are now presented with somebody who is in favour of a referendum but does not want to have it when it is inconvenient. This is a most peculiar amendment. I...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2011
Reference
728 c634
House
House of Lords

I am always worried when my noble friend intervenes upon me but I am very pleased on this occasion to say that I agree with him entirely. This is an issue for Parliament and Parliament should make up its own mind—I have no doubt about that at all. He need...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2011
Reference
728 c291-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I find myself in disagreement with both my noble friend Lord Lamont and the noble Lord behind him. I am opposed to referenda in any case and do not think that we should judge referenda, even if we are in favour of them, by the particular amendment that...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2011
Reference
728 c290-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have not been able to support the Government at all times during the passage of this Bill. I hope therefore to rectify that, at least in part, on this occasion. It seems to me that it is a mistake to say that at all times a declaratory...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
727 c1661-3
House
House of Lords

Might the noble Lord not suggest that there could be a better question: do the people of Britain want to have their climate changed and their health impaired by the continuation of extremely dirty power stations, which happily we are going to close down?

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
727 c440-1
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord really must not say that. It is not true. Most of our fishing grounds have always been shared with our neighbours—the French, the Belgians and the Germans—and we have always had to come to terms with them. All that the European common fisheries policy does is to...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
727 c445
House
House of Lords

It was a perfectly right intervention but that does not actually give powers to compel. It says that the countries shall do it but there is no mechanism at the moment to insist that they do it. That is the issue.

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
727 c444
House
House of Lords

Very simply, the EU does not have powers to insist that we improve the electricity transfer between countries, yet that will be an essential part of our future energy needs.

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
727 c444
House
House of Lords

That would mean that we had no common trade policy. Every country could say that this decision was contrary to their national interest. The French have managed to make the sale of Orangina contrary to their national interest. What the noble Baroness suggests would destroy any possibility of the scheme....

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
727 c434-5
House
House of Lords

What would the referendum question be, were such a suggestion to be made? Would that referendum question be capable of a reasonable yes or no answer for the majority of the people of Great Britain?

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
727 c426
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it might encourage your Lordships’ House to hear that I do not intend to talk about piracy; I seek to talk about the amendments that deal with the environment and climate change. These differ from earlier amendments. I disagree with the noble Lord, Lord Triesman, as it seems...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
727 c432-3
House
House of Lords

In stating that conclusion, does my hon. Friend not agree with me that it is even more important for those of us who do not believe in referendums, and who in fact think this a perfectly reasonable treaty, to have the time to discuss that? Does he not agree that...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2008
Reference
471 c93
House
House of Commons

Further to an earlier point of order, which was a point of order, may I just make sure that I have got this right? Am I right in saying that, if the House passes this motion, it places itself at the mercy of the Government as to whether an amending...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2008
Reference
471 c49
House
House of Commons

Further to that point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I would like to bring you back to the first of the points put by the hon. Member for Crewe and Nantwich (Mrs. Dunwoody). Could any Member stand up and propose a motion to negative this timing arrangement and reinstate the...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2008
Reference
471 c51
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend be careful to remind the Government that his point applies to all that they have done to weaken Parliament since they came to power? It is a criticism of permanent guillotines, shorter hours, and asking for more money for doing less work and not holding the...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2008
Reference
471 c91
House
House of Commons

Not only were there 29 days, but the days were filled with debates on substantive motions and proper amendments. There was an opportunity for hon. Members to put their case and to vote on it, but this allocation of time is totally different.

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2008
Reference
471 c64
House
House of Commons

Does the Minister accept that even those of us who are not unhappy about the treaty but do not believe in referendums are unhappy about the timetable for the same reasons as many who have doubts about the treaty? A series of subjects has already been raised with him that...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2008
Reference
471 c36
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman should not allow the Government to get away with the fact that this is not the first time that this has happened. Bill after Bill, we have been told that the particular proposals are innocuous and do not mean what they seem to mean and that we...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 May 2006
Reference
446 c765
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that a Government who refuse to include the word ““reasonable”” are suggesting that in some circumstances they wish to act unreasonably and that the word ““reasonable”” is so reasonable that it would look very unreasonable if they did not accept it?

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 May 2006
Reference
446 c772
House
House of Commons