Skip to main content

1-20 of 105 results for subject:Companies

Member X
Dominic Grieve

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Grieve, Dominic (105)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That this House is concerned that the sale of membership of timeshare schemes and products often involves practices which are psychologically manipulative, use misleading information and unfairly exploit vulnerable, often elderly, consumers, leading to those consumers taking out very expensive borrowing commitments which they cannot afford; notes that the sale...

Primary sponsor
Tommy Sheppard (Scottish National Party)
Type
Early day motions
Date
17 October 2018
Reference
1720
House
House of Commons

Will my right hon. Friend encourage the Leader of the Opposition to write to him to set out in detail the allegations he makes against him, either of breaking the law of propriety or the rules of this House? Having listened carefully to the Leader of the Opposition, I fail...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 April 2016
Reference
608 c37
House
House of Commons
I think it is right to say that in the case of Mabey Engineering, the company that held the dividends was a subsidiary company—that is, a holding company held the dividends. That said, I cannot give the hon. Gentleman any specific assurance as we will consider the matter on a case-by-case basis. The principle of the possibility of taking back dividends that have been paid wrongly, as they are the fruit of bribery and corruption, must clearly be kept in mind.
Answered by
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 February 2012
Reference
540 c164
House
House of Commons
The Government are committed to protecting and building on the reputation of UK business. The recent use of the civil recovery process to recover shared dividend payments derived through contracts won through unlawful conduct reinforces that. The actions of the Serious Fraud Office send a clear message to shareholders and investors, particularly institutional investors, that they must satisfy themselves that the business practices of the companies in which they invest are legal and ethical. The Serious Fraud Office has signalled its intention rigorously to pursue similar civil recovery actions, where appropriate, in the future.
Answered by
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 February 2012
Reference
540 c164
House
House of Commons
To ask the Attorney General, what recent assessment he has made of the implications for his policies of the successful application by the Serious Fraud Office to confiscate dividends paid by companies convicted of bribery.
Asked by
Andy Slaughter (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
7 February 2012
Reference
93680; 540 c164
House
House of Commons

This discussion touches on an important issue. The system that we are setting up and, in particular, the way in which the Serious Fraud Office has been working are undoubtedly intended to encourage companies to come forward and admit wrongdoing if it has taken place, and to accept that penalties...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c949
House
House of Commons

I am sorry that the Lord Chancellor is being subjected to a barrage of Front-Bench interventions, but another issue arises. I am sure the Lord Chancellor agrees that there are often grey areas in what is bribery and what may not be. In other countries—including, I believe, the United States—it...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c950
House
House of Commons

In welcoming the Bill and in the light of the comments made by the Lord Chancellor, I do not think that I can start my remarks without echoing the sadness on the Conservative side of the House at the death of Michael Foot. Although, having entered the House in 1997,...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c957-9
House
House of Commons

I appreciate the hon. Gentleman's point, but we cannot easily get away from this matter. Of course, one can set up a prosecutorial system in which Parliament, the Executive and the Government have absolutely no say whatever in any prosecutorial decisions, but I think that is fanciful because, as we...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c959
House
House of Commons

I am trying to remember the exact wording, but I seem to recollect that one of the functions of the Security Service and the SIS is to ensure the economic security or well-being of the nation. One can imagine how one interpretation of that could suggest that bribery might be...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c953
House
House of Commons

The Minister will be aware that I highlighted the regulatory nature of the Bill. Clause 7 is entitled "Failure of commercial organisations to prevent bribery". Earlier, I used the word "negligence", but that probably was not strictly right. It is in fact a strict liability offence tempered by a defence,...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c980
House
House of Commons

Yes, indeed, and it is arguable that it might be neutral one way or the other as to whether it is the Attorney-General or one of the departmental directors who takes such decisions under the system, but it certainly provides a mechanism by which individuals who feel that the decision...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c959
House
House of Commons

I certainly agree with my hon. Friend. What seems to happen, as the decades go by, is that the world view of countries' propensity to tolerate bribery alters. When I was younger there seemed to be a widespread view that this country was intolerant of bribery and that many foreign...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c960-2
House
House of Commons

Bribery Bill (HL) second reading debate. Agreed to on question and committed to a Public Bill Committee. Programme motion agreed to on question.

Lead member
Jack Straw
Answering member
Dominic Grieve
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c945-83
House
House of Commons

I present to the House new clause 5, which stands in my name and the names of my hon. Friends; amendment No. 83 is consequential to it. Through its long title, the Bill offers us the opportunity of looking at the working of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000,...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2007
Reference
465 c85-8
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2007
Reference
465 c85
House
House of Commons

I recommend that the Minister read the debate on the 2003 order. It was an extremely bad- tempered event, because the Government were late in presenting the relevant material to the House and they did not wait for the report from the Joint Committee on Human Rights. Many of the...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2007
Reference
465 c89
House
House of Commons

I disagree with the Minister. If the new clause were accepted, it would immediately create an incompatibility between RIPA's new wording and the scope of the orders passed by the House. The primary legislation would no longer back up the full scope of the secondary legislation, particularly the organisations that...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2007
Reference
465 c89
House
House of Commons

Let me start by saying some pleasant things to the Minister. I thank him for the amendments that the Government have tabled in respect of the level of officer in Customs and Excise authorising intrusive surveillance. We are grateful for the Minister's response to the representations made by my hon....

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2007
Reference
465 c90-1
House
House of Commons

I find those distinctions untenable. A corporate body that builds and tests aircraft, often at the limits of technology, is working in a difficult environment that may be threatening to an employee flying the aircraft. The company faces the possibility of being charged with corporate manslaughter if it is grossly...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c103-4
House
House of Commons