Skip to main content

1-13 of 13 results for subject:Devolution

Member X
Paul Goggins
Subject X
Political parties

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Goggins, Paul (13)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Political parties (13)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I fully support clause 3, but will the Secretary of State explain why she is making arrangements for Members of the House of Commons to be disqualified from membership of the Assembly, but not making similar arrangements for Members of the House of Lords? I know from personal experience that...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2013
Reference
565 c50
House
House of Commons

I am pleased that my hon. Friend has raised that point. He said that the Bill contains measures that will clearly have broad support in all parts of the House. He is right, however, to argue with some urgency about the need to return to provisions in the Crime and...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2013
Reference
565 c57
House
House of Commons

I have a very long speech, but the House will be delighted to learn that I do not intend to use it all. I thank the hon. Members for Tewkesbury (Mr. Robertson) and for Belfast, North (Mr. Dodds) for their support. The phrase used by the latter to describe this...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
488 c946-7
House
House of Commons

It will be a different arrangement for removal because there is a different arrangement for appointment. The same mechanism for appointment is therefore available for removal. That is entirely consistent with the other models, even if it is different in the respect that the Assembly appoints the Minister. The party...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
488 c919-20
House
House of Commons

Indeed, it is broadly accepted, certainly in the conversations that I have with the Lord Chief Justice, the Director of Public Prosecutions, or anybody else. The issue of independence is absolutely written through the whole system and is seen as highly significant. It is not only the DPP who may...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
488 c954
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman is entirely right. This does not apply only to producing the annual report. If a Committee, particularly the Justice Committee, wished to take evidence from the DPP, the DPP could be invited to attend and such evidence could be given. Indeed, the DPP gives evidence to...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
488 c953
House
House of Commons

I thank everyone who has participated in the Second Reading debate this afternoon. One of the important features of the Bill is that, while it is our business here, it is very much a Bill made in Northern Ireland, reflecting the agreement between the First Minister and Deputy First Minister...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
488 c917-9
House
House of Commons

The parties themselves will have to determine the model beyond May 2012. We are devolving policing and justice powers; we are not saying that we are partly devolving them and saving a little for ourselves. The matter is entirely for those parties. From everything that I see and hear, I...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
488 c919
House
House of Commons

It is time for a pause, to breathe and reflect. If the hon. Member for Tewkesbury (Mr. Robertson) wishes to intervene to tease this issue out a little further, I will be more than happy to give way. However, like the Secretary of State, I have to put it to...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
488 c952
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for that. The hon. Gentleman and I spend a lot of time in Committee together, and I have always found his approach to such issues entirely practical. I thank him for that. The issue is as significant as I have set out, so I am pleased that...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
488 c952
House
House of Commons

Any party is, of course, entitled to raise debate in this place; that is what this place is about. However, we also have to respect and recognise that in the process of improvement and change towards peace and progress in Northern Ireland, certain key staging posts have been reached. A...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
488 c952-3
House
House of Commons

The DPP will be answerable to the Assembly for the use of resources and the administration of its office—that is very clear—but not for individual prosecution decisions, which are entirely for the independent DPP. It is important at the point of devolution that that is made absolutely clear and enshrined...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
488 c953
House
House of Commons

Allocation of time motion. Amendment negatived on division (213 votes to 276). Main question agreed to. Second reading debate. Agreed to on question. Committee stage. Clauses 1 to 5 agreed to. Schedules 1 to 6 agreed to. New clause debated. Bill reported without amendment. Third reading debate. Agreed to on...

Lead member
Shaun Woodward
Answering member
Owen Paterson
Department
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HC)
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
488 c854-958
House
House of Commons