Skip to main content

1-20 of 144 results for subject:Evidence

Member X
Lord Garnier

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Garnier, Lord (144)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I rise with a degree of caution. I entirely understand the motives behind the amendments moved by my noble friend

Lord Sandhurst, and that moved by the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton. Shall we begin by trying to remember what an unduly lenient sentence is? It is one that...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc283-5
House
House of Lords

I can see what the printed words say, but if the Crown Prosecution Service was to write to the victim saying, “Do you realise that you can apply to the law officers to have this sentence reviewed by the Court of Appeal?”, it would give an imprimatur and an indication....

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc283-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am delighted to be able to support my noble friend Lady Sater’s amendment. I have heard her express these views before, I heard her express them just now, and there is nothing more to be said. I urge this Committee to get on and agree with her.

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c288
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the problem for the Government is not the collapse of the spy trial, embarrassing though that may be, but the fact that this story keeps dribbling on from day to day and the Government do not seem to be able to get off the hook.

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2025
Reference
849 c642
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister accept that China is a malign actor? It does not have our interests at heart and that the sooner we bring the Chinese embassy plans to a swift end, the better.

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
849 c486
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will begin with the routine: reminding the House of my entry in the register of interests, including my practice at the Bar, which covers cases that have to do with the general subject matter of the Bill.

I now move to a unique, but none the less welcome,...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2023
Reference
834 cc2105-8
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Garnier

55ZA: Clause 63, page 59, line 11, at end insert—

“(1A) The occupier, a representative of the occupier or a constable may only make a request under subsection (1)(d) if they have ascertained from the local authority within whose area the land is situated—

(a) that there is a suitable...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2021
Reference
817 c51
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by explaining that I will not be pressing my amendment to a Division. I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Whitaker, for prompting me—although she may not have realised this at the time—during the course of Committee, when we were debating other amendments in Part 4 dealing...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2021
Reference
817 cc51-5
House
House of Lords

I am so glad to have the approbation of the noble Lords opposite, for whom I have the greatest respect—on their negotiated stopping site.

That is what I invite the House and the Minister to consider, and perhaps the Minister will respond in due course, saying why my idea is not...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2021
Reference
817 c55
House
House of Lords

My Lords, 15 noble Lords have spoken in this debate. Most of them have concentrated on amendments other than mine, which is hardly surprising. Three broad points have emerged from this debate which I hope are uncontroversial.

First, there is an undersupply of official local authority Traveller sites. Regardless of quite...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2021
Reference
817 cc75-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for performing what I think must have been quite a difficult task in explaining so clearly this long and complicated Bill. In referring to my interest as a barrister in private practice, as set out in the register, I also say how much I...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2021
Reference
814 cc1295-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, hiding behind this ostensibly anodyne order, which has been so clearly explained by my noble friend the Minister, are some complicated and highly sensitive questions about our criminal justice system—questions about how we deal with terrorism and terrorism suspects; about the relationship between the police and the accused;...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 July 2020
Reference
804 cc1356-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend Lord Blencathra’s Amendment 1 and the amendments in the next group to be moved by the noble Baroness,

Lady Bull, and spoken to by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope of Craighead, are concerned with the prisoner’s state of mind or mental capacity at...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2020
Reference
803 cc1134-6
House
House of Lords

Following on from the hon. Member for Brighton, Pavilion (Caroline Lucas), I fear that there is no such thing as a perfect piece of legislation. None the less, what we have produced today, albeit in some considerable speed, is a Bill entirely worthy of the support of the entire House....

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2014
Reference
584 c828
House
House of Commons
The effective management and disclosure of evidence relies on the proper discharge of duties and obligations by both the police and the prosecutor. Although there have been failures in a small number of cases, in the vast majority of cases the disclosure duties are carried out well. As the hon. Member for Blaenau Gwent (Nick Smith) will know, there is currently an inquiry into the Lynette White case in south Wales, more properly called the Crown v. Mouncher and others. The Independent Police Complaints Commission is carrying out a review of police conduct in that case, and the Director of Public Prosecutions has separately and additionally asked the inspectorate of the Crown Prosecution Service to carry out a review of the actions and decision making of the CPS in relation to disclosure in that case.
Answered by
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 February 2012
Reference
540 c162
House
House of Commons
The effective management and disclosure of evidence relies on the proper discharge of duties and obligations by both the police and the prosecutor. Although there have been failures in a small number of cases, in the vast majority of cases the disclosure duties are carried out well. As the hon. Member for Blaenau Gwent (Nick Smith) will know, there is currently an inquiry into the Lynette White case in south Wales, more properly called the Crown v. Mouncher and others. The Independent Police Complaints Commission is carrying out a review of police conduct in that case, and the Director of Public Prosecutions has separately and additionally asked the inspectorate of the Crown Prosecution Service to carry out a review of the actions and decision making of the CPS in relation to disclosure in that case.
Answered by
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 February 2012
Reference
540 c162
House
House of Commons
Off the top of my head, I am not aware of any such cases, but the right hon. Lady is right to point out that the collapse of the Lynette White case in south Wales just recently, which affects her constituents and neighbours and those of the hon. Member for Blaenau Gwent (Nick Smith), is a matter of huge regret. It is now being subjected to two inquiries. Once they have been completed, further announcements will be made.
Answered by
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 February 2012
Reference
540 c163
House
House of Commons
It will not make an assessment until the two inquiries are completed.
Answered by
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 February 2012
Reference
540 c162-3
House
House of Commons
Clearly—particularly in large and complex cases such as the one we are talking about—the need to get disclosure right is key. That is also true, however, in what one might call less serious cases—although I do not want to be misunderstood when I use that adjective. My hon. Friend's point about other police forces dealing with the disclosure in such cases must, surely, be a matter for the chief constable of the relevant police area. I have no doubt that the Home Secretary, who is sitting beside me, will bear that in mind in due course.
Answered by
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 February 2012
Reference
540 c163
House
House of Commons
To ask the Attorney General, what recent assessment he has made of the management and disclosure of evidence by the Crown Prosecution Service.
Asked by
Ann Clwyd (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
7 February 2012
Reference
93679; 540 c162
House
House of Commons