Skip to main content

1-11 of 11 results for subject:VAT

Member X
Mark Field
Subject X
Property transfer

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Field, Mark (11)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Property transfer (11)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

As the Economic Secretary will appreciate, the amendment covers some of the ground that was cantered over in Committee, but that is unavoidable. We are attempting to ensure that statutory instruments are required for the inserted section 431A of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 that appears in schedule...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c393-5
House
House of Commons

I hasten to add that I was not on the trip, although I am sure that one could be arranged at some time in the future. I am glad that the Chancellor is not in the Chamber to hear me say that. The UK Government have created a great collection...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c326-7
House
House of Commons

I was rather hoping that the hon. Gentleman might have been the chairman of the all-party group on Estonia or something. Let me answer his point seriously. There is little doubt that much of what has been discussed during the consideration of the Bill—and previous Finance Bills, I suspect—has related...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c327
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time. As Paul McCartney and John Lennon might have said, we are now reaching the end of the long and winding road of this second Finance Bill of the year.

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c325
House
House of Commons

The song was No. 1 in the US in 1970, but that is another matter. This complex and highly technical Bill is once more before the whole House, but the sparsely occupied Chamber means that it would be stretching credulity to suggest that Parliament is actively considering each and every...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c325-6
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes an entirely legitimate point. I shall address specific aspects of the tax law rewrite project later because it has not achieved quite as much as we might have hoped. Someone needs to stand back and realise that when UK legislation on direct tax is bursting out...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c327-30
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has misunderstood what we are trying to achieve. We think that establishing such a commission is a sensible way forward, given the sheer amount of taxation legislation and the fact that little of it is regularly reviewed. That does not mean that policy matters would be in...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c331
House
House of Commons

Yes, the title passes the simplicity and certainty test. Of that there can be no doubt. The working party’s report would be germane to the report mentioned in the new clause. Also, the Chartered Institute of Taxation has proposed the idea of a tax practice committee, which would, in concept,...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c330
House
House of Commons

I suspect that the consideration of clause 4 always brings out a certain sensitivity in Labour Members. However, I thank the Financial Secretary for his considered reply. As ever, my hon. Friend the Member for Chipping Barnet (Mrs. Villiers) made an excellent contribution based on her great experience as a...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c338
House
House of Commons

: I beg to move amendment No. 5, in page 131, line 14, at end insert

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c393
House
House of Commons

I am glad that we have had a concise debate and a precise response from the Minister on this issue. He is quite right when he identifies that the Government have gone some way, through the sunset clause, to keeping the insurance industry happy. One of the main reasons for...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c397;436 c397-8
House
House of Commons