Skip to main content

1-17 of 17 results for subject:VAT

Member X
Lord Field of Birkenhead
Subject X
Rural areas

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Field of Birkenhead, Lord (17)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Rural areas (17)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
492 c894
House
House of Commons

I shall take up the Exchequer Secretary's offer and her suggestion about others with whom I might make contact. I think that our poorer constituents accept that the Government need to raise revenue, and that they raise it from drivers in different ways. However, their plea is that we take...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
492 c905
House
House of Commons

As you know, Mr. Atkinson, I and my hon. Friend the Member for North-West Leicestershire (David Taylor) have tabled amendment No. 16. For reasons that we well understand—although people outside may not—it is not in order for that amendment to be called today, so I am grateful to be able...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
492 c893-4
House
House of Commons

And friend, very much so. I was going to call her my very honourable Friend, as both of our expenses have been published, but I did not know whether the term would be in order. The Minister is, of course, my very, very hon. Friend the Member for Wallasey, and...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
492 c894
House
House of Commons

I do not want us to get muddled up with smoking taxation. I am raising the issue of low-paid workers—people who want to work and who do work—who face the cost of getting to work in their cars. The question they posed, which I put to Treasury Ministers, is whether...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
492 c897
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for giving way. As the Budget comes after the beginning of the financial year, is not all taxation retrospective?

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
492 c894
House
House of Commons

The provisions of the clause and those on fuel duties—the subject of our next debate—are precisely the reason why I made the plea to the Government to take a more comprehensive view of the impact of vehicle taxation, both geographically and on various income groups.

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
492 c896
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for those comments. The thrust of his remarks was that we have not put forward a workable scheme for transitional relief, but it was only seconds before I came into the Chamber that we got the crudest information on the numbers who would be...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2007
Reference
462 c121-2
House
House of Commons

There clearly are. People will draw their own conclusions from the contributions made in the debate. I did not think that the answers given from the Treasury Bench were adequate. My right hon. Friend the Chief Secretary is probably the most gifted member of the Treasury team and he knows...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2007
Reference
462 c122
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend says that he is in some difficulty because he does not understand the nature of transitional relief, but we are still waiting for him to give us a proper breakdown of who benefits and who loses. His difficulties are nowhere near as great as ours in...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2007
Reference
462 c120
House
House of Commons

That contribution was valuable not only because of the point that was made, but because it gave me a chance to read the parliamentary answer, so I shall read the heart of the mystery into the record before I sit down. The next part of the new clause is supported...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2007
Reference
462 c109
House
House of Commons

At Easter, the hon. Lady could be cast in the role of Pontius Pilate without any difficulties given the hand-washing that is being done. For those of our constituents—she will have some—who will be made worse off by this measure, what changes do the Opposition propose to protect their very...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2007
Reference
462 c111
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time. I was a few minutes late because I went to check the letter board, hoping that I would have an answer to the question that I first tabled on 16 April and retabled on 30 April. On three...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2007
Reference
462 c108-9
House
House of Commons

I will happily give way to my hon. Friend, which will allow me to read the next paragraph.

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2007
Reference
462 c109
House
House of Commons

I willingly add that fourth group who will lose out because of the measure. The second paragraph of the written answer states that"““four in five households will be better off or see no change in household income””." That means that one in five households will lose out. The person who...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 June 2007
Reference
462 c110
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend accept that he would simply be developing existing Government policy? In our inner-city areas in which sales needed stimulus, the Government gave stamp duty exemptions, and the policy was successful.

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c772
House
House of Commons

Given my hon. Friend’s normal stance, is there not some originality in his position of encouraging the Treasury Bench to adopt and support a market-led solution?

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c773
House
House of Commons