Skip to main content

1-16 of 16 results for subject:VAT

Member X
Lord Field of Birkenhead
Subject X
Business

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Field of Birkenhead, Lord (16)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Business (16)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

When the Chancellor came to the part of his statement about tax credits, I assumed that it was good news, as it was quickly overwhelmed by cheers from those on his own side. For that good news, I thank him. I heard him preface those remarks by saying that he...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2015
Reference
602 c1380
House
House of Commons

Closing schemes to us will be the easiest bit. The difficult bit will be closing them to other people—but it is a start.

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
492 c208
House
House of Commons

May I remind the House of the figures that I gave earlier? The Government think that we will be back in growth. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research thinks that we will have tax revenues of 38 per cent. and expenditure of 48 per cent. The structural imbalance...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
492 c213
House
House of Commons

I am sorry that the hon. Gentleman does not know what is happening. We have made it plain on the Order Paper; an early-day motion has been signed by those Labour Members who wish to see full justice for the group of low-paid workers who lost out with the abolition...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
492 c190
House
House of Commons

I thought that the hon. Gentleman would spend a little more time on the 10p issue. When Labour Members attempt to amend the Budget to do justice for the group that still has not been fully compensated for the 10p change, will we be able to depend on the support...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
492 c190
House
House of Commons

Of course the office would say yes to that question, because if they said no, then whatever we call it would hit the fan. I am grateful for my hon. Friend's intervention, because I want to emphasise that one hopes that the scenario that he describes continues, as it is...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
492 c206
House
House of Commons

I want to address an assumption about the Budget which is shared not only by all those on the Treasury Bench but by those on the official Opposition Front Bench. I hope that they are correct. The assumption to which I refer is that somehow the country will get safely...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
492 c205-6
House
House of Commons

Absolutely, and of course that will be a start, but important though our budget is to taxpayers at the moment, it is small compared with the budget that we will be paying out mid-century—£90 billion, unless we make changes. We could just say in a rough and ready way that...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
492 c208-9
House
House of Commons

My point is to draw attention to the scenario—not to wish that it would occur, but to suggest that it would be sensible if we thought that it might, and planned for it, given the horrors that would confront the country if there were nothing in the cupboard at that...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
492 c206-8
House
House of Commons

I will give way, but I do not want to take too long.

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
492 c206
House
House of Commons

That is my next point. I am grateful that I gave way, not because it is not always a pleasure to do so, but because my hon. Friend the Member for Sunderland, South (Mr. Mullin) told me that I spoke about a VAT increase, when we are, of course, debating...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 December 2008
Reference
485 c1138-40
House
House of Commons

May I just ask whether the institute supported the idea of raising taxes on the rich?

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 December 2008
Reference
485 c1136
House
House of Commons

I am delighted to follow the hon. Member for Twickenham (Dr. Cable). I want, if anything, to add a sense of urgency to the case that he deployed. As we were reminded, we rise tomorrow for the Christmas recess, and when we return the economic landscape will have changed even...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 December 2008
Reference
485 c1137-8
House
House of Commons

Might I remind the hon. Gentleman that he has been speaking for longer than the hon. Member for Twickenham (Dr. Cable) spoke in moving the motion, and during that time we learned why the Liberal Democrats disagreed with the Government's strategy and what they would do? Might I suggest that...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 December 2008
Reference
485 c1142
House
House of Commons

Is it not true that most firms are now cutting prices, and therefore have not had to make adjustments to take account of the VAT changes?

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 December 2008
Reference
485 c1150
House
House of Commons

May I bring the Chancellor back to the 6 million taxpayers who are still losers after the abolition of the 10p rate? Although I understand why he has had to find billions upon billions of pounds for City slickers who have got us into this mess, may I express my...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c515
House
House of Commons