Skip to main content

1-20 of 50 results for subject:Pornography

Member X
Earl of Erroll

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Erroll, Earl of (50)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I can see what the noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, is saying about Third Reading, but it would be wiser to vote for this amendment now—if noble Lords have any conscience at all, they have to vote for it—and if it is slightly defective it can be amended at...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c986
House
House of Lords

My Lords, several Peers have mentioned the Digital Economy Act 2017 and the sadness of the constitutional impropriety when the Executive refused to implement the will of Parliament. That really concerned me because, if it had been implemented, so many children would have been protected, for several years by now....

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2023
Reference
827 cc749-750
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I almost wonder what I can add to what the two previous speakers have said. I entirely agree with the noble Lord, Lord Morrow, in bringing this Bill; it is long overdue. I just do not know what went wrong inside the Civil Service and the Executive for...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2022
Reference
818 cc562-4
House
House of Lords

Why is DCMS against protecting children from absorbing unsavoury sexual practices at a formative age? I do not understand why it wants to delay so much. Most adult websites are onside for doing something and adopting age-verification controls, as long as rivals are compelled to do so as well. There...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2019
Reference
800 c170
House
House of Lords

Okay, right. The question was right at the start. Several AV providers have spent a lot of money on implementing this and getting it all ready to go. Who is going to compensate them? A lot of money has been spent to get this ready in time.

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2019
Reference
800 c171
House
House of Lords

I also regret this and am very sad about it. We have already been waiting for two years. Talk about dragging feet on this; I cannot believe it takes so long. I do not understand what the problem is with the guidance on age-verification arrangements. I have read it again...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2019
Reference
798 cc889-890
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want to say a few words before the summing up. We need to remind ourselves that the purpose of these regulations is to protect children, including those coming up to adulthood. We are trying to prevent them thinking that some fairly unsavoury habits that are not medically...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2018
Reference
794 cc1295-7
House
House of Lords

It is not the ISPs that I am worried about; it is the websites that will game the system on notification, appeals and so on. That is the bit that will take a long time.

7 pm

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2018
Reference
794 c1306
House
House of Lords

Why is there so much wriggle room in section 6 of the guidance from the DCMS to the AV regulator? The ISP blocking probably will not work, because everyone will just get out of it. If we bring this into disrepute then the good guys, who would like to comply, probably will not; they will not be able to do so economically. All that was covered in British Standard PAS 1296, which was developed over three years. It seems to have been totally ignored by the DCMS. You have spent an awful lot of time getting there, but you have not got there.

Asked by
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 November 2018
Reference
793 c1534
House
House of Lords

Leading on from that, I remember from the debates that the trouble was that the Obscene Publications Act was not aligned with the CPS guidance or with various other things. I presume therefore that some work will be done on this in the near future, otherwise I suspect that the...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2018
Reference
788 c1760
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want to say a few words. I was quite involved in this issue when it was going through as part of our consideration of the Digital Economy Act. The Digital Policy Alliance, of which I am chairman, has had a working group on age verification for several...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2018
Reference
788 cc1755-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I add my great thanks to the Minister, on behalf of all the people I was talking to, for his intelligent and sensitive handling of the rather difficult, tortuous, twisting turns which were confusing what we saw as the perceived prime purpose of Part 3. I think we...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 c1101
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will make some brief points. First, on this set of amendments I am afraid I disagree with the noble Baroness: we must get on with this. It will not be perfect on day one but the sooner we get moving the better. We have talked about this...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2017
Reference
778 cc1294-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I put my name down to one of these amendments because I wanted to talk about appeals. The reason for that is very simple and comes back to what I said earlier. I do not think there should be any question about there being no age verification. That...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2017
Reference
778 c1304
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have been talking about payments. I agree entirely that the big challenge is everybody moving offshore, and so the problem becomes foreign websites supplying pornography. The Committee is quite right about that. But I thought I ought to comment on the business of processing payments. One thing...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2015
Reference
767 c1807
House
House of Lords

This amendment is quite logical, if the provisions are going to work. It is obvious that, if people can switch off filters, the whole thing is bypassed. I want to speak on the next amendment, about age checking, but this is a logical amendment to have if you want to...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2015
Reference
767 c1794
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want to say a few things at this point because this amendment refers to age-verification policies, which Ofcom is supposed to be producing. I do not want to say very much about it, but there are things other than direct adult content online. For example, we need...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2015
Reference
767 cc1800-1
House
House of Lords

Being realistic, I suspect that the Minister’s timetable in the real world is probably very sensible. You can legislate hastily but then there will be huge arguments about it. It is a bit like the Digital Economy Act, which was rushed through. The measures in that to try to prevent...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2015
Reference
767 c1801
House
House of Lords

I totally accept that. I was just using it as an example of where legislation has gone through in haste with very good intentions but it has not worked because it has not been thought through technically. Checking age is quite complex—for various reasons I prefer the word “checking” to...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2015
Reference
767 c1801
House
House of Lords

Yes, there is, interestingly enough. It is to do with the law. Because of anti-money laundering, the gambling industry has to do client checks; it has to behave almost as if it were a bank. As a result, companies have to be able to prove the identity of the person....

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2015
Reference
767 c1807
House
House of Lords