Skip to main content

1-10 of 10 results for subject:VAT

Member X
Clive Efford
Subject X
Capital gains tax

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Efford, Clive (10)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Capital gains tax (10)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To correct the hon. Member for West Suffolk (Matthew Hancock), it is just not true to say that the banks are going to pay more. Deutsche Bank has said:""Taking 2% off the 2012 tax rate for the five banks listed in the UK would increase profit by £1.16bn, that is...

Member
Clive Efford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2010
Reference
513 c726
House
House of Commons

I apologise to the hon. Gentleman in advance for going back to what was said during the general election, but it is important in this context. The Liberal Democrats said that they were in favour of a banking levy, as he has just said, but they went further and said...

Member
Clive Efford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2010
Reference
513 c721
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend, because his probing is uncovering who is winning the arguments on the Government Benches. The Liberal Democrats went into the election calling for a 10% levy on banks, but the outcome is that what has been raised in the levy has more than...

Member
Clive Efford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2010
Reference
513 c716-7
House
House of Commons

My point is that that was the sum total of the right hon. Gentleman's contribution on that subject. He then elaborated on other issues. The point is that the thrust of the amendment is evasion—people working the system in a way that breaches the rules and means that they do...

Member
Clive Efford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2010
Reference
513 c699
House
House of Commons

I could not agree more. If I were to start listing some of the harsher items in the Budget, such as the £1.9 billion that the Government are trying to take out of housing benefit or the overall £11 billion from the welfare budget, I would risk incurring your wrath,...

Member
Clive Efford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2010
Reference
513 c698
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend's intervention needs no comment from me, other than to say that it is an excellent example of the sort of practices that we need to bear down on. We pay a plethora of accountants and financial advisers to advise on how to invest our money wisely, and...

Member
Clive Efford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2010
Reference
513 c699
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes a point that I could repeat. Cutbacks in Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs staff make more distant the target of maximising the amount of tax taken. He may have joined me on the odd occasion when I voted against the previous Government, so we have been...

Member
Clive Efford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2010
Reference
513 c698-9
House
House of Commons

I pay tribute to the hon. Member for Lincoln (Karl McCartney), who made his maiden speech. Many of us remember his predecessor with great fondness, and we certainly notice the difference in appearance to which he referred. She was a popular Member here, as I suspect that she was in...

Member
Clive Efford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2010
Reference
513 c697-8
House
House of Commons

The point, on which I believe we are all in agreement, is that everyone should pay the tax that they are due to pay. Amendment 11 proposes not that corporation tax should be raised or reduced, but that it should be paid, that the Government ought to take action to...

Member
Clive Efford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2010
Reference
513 c698
House
House of Commons

I am interested in the right hon. Gentleman's train of thought, but will he clarify something? Is he saying that there is no such thing as avoidance of corporation tax, or is he saying that anything that comes about is just the result of a misunderstanding?

Member
Clive Efford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2010
Reference
513 c693
House
House of Commons