Skip to main content

1-20 of 54 results for subject:Liability

Member X
Viscount Eccles

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Eccles, Viscount (54)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Perhaps I should already know this, but will it be possible, in the additional technical work, for an individual to decline to have the information about his or her pension position put on

to a dashboard? If past history is any guide, some people will always prefer not to join...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2020
Reference
802 c203GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have put my name to my noble friend’s amendment and will concentrate briefly on what I would describe as a gamekeeper and poacher situation. Because Defra and Kew together determine the interpretation of the general functions of Kew, which are set out in Section 24, they can...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 May 2019
Reference
797 c1876
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt my noble friend. He has used the phrase “non-core” three times. How does he define that? Until you define your attitude to the six general functions in some detail, you cannot come to a judgment on what is core and what is not. Some properties...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 May 2019
Reference
797 c1878
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have a great deal of time for what the noble Baroness, Lady Tonge, just said. I also have a great deal of time for this amendment. To me, the crucial thing is the words,

“compatible with the core … scientific … activities of the Royal Botanic Gardens”.

As I...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 May 2019
Reference
797 cc1886-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on a rather different historical note, this Bill owes much of its existence to the Voluntary Euthanasia Society, which was founded in the 1930s. The first Bill introduced into this House under the society’s aegis, fathered by Lord Moynihan, was the Voluntary Euthanasia (Legalisation) Bill 1936. Lord Moynihan...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2014
Reference
755 cc867-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I should like to make a short intervention. I think that the antithesis between transparency and market confidence is out of date. In a reasonably open society with a free media, in the digital age, you cannot maintain the argument that there is a genuine antithesis between transparency...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
707 c642
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in my copy of the amendments, subsection (1)(b) states, "““loans made under section 226;””" I think that must be a misprint for ““228””.

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
707 c600
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support my noble friend’s amendment. We live—is it supposedly?—in a sophisticated democracy, and it is a fault of Governments that they do not explain to the electorate what is happening to them. That is very much in evidence at the present time. The transparency inherent in my...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
707 c636
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry to intervene again; I probably did not make myself clear. Even if Parliament was sitting, an order would have had to have been laid, for example, to suspend trading in the shares. That would have happened before Parliament could have any discussion. So even if...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
707 c575
House
House of Lords

My Lords, would the situation be any different if Parliament were sitting?

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
707 c574
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Bradford & Bingley is not a good precedent; I shall try to explain why that is my view. First, on a matter of fact, subsection (8)(a) states that an order may be made. In the case of Bradford & Bingley, the order came in front of Parliament at...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
707 c573
House
House of Lords

Can I make absolutely sure that, when auditors are mentioned, we are not talking about the auditors of Northern Rock?

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c97
House
House of Lords

That would raise a serious issue of the auditors’ duty. I would have thought that the valuer would have been able to sort out the duty of Northern Rock’s auditors himself.

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c97
House
House of Lords

I offer one definition of financial stability, or at least a test, which might be considered when the Treasury and the Bank of England are doing their work—the avoidance of queues of depositors outside the branches of any bank or building society.

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c111
House
House of Lords

I wish to pursue the question of this auditor. The auditor is an officer of the company. Auditors will recognise that he has a duty both to the directors of the company and to the shareholders. I urge the Minister to check whether, in a question of compensation, the reference...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c97
House
House of Lords

My noble friend’s argument again raises a familiar point, which is that given current circumstances and the way in which the Bill was originally envisaged, there must be a danger that many parts of it will not be brought into action under secondary legislation for a long time to come,...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c20
House
House of Lords

Will the Minister consider giving some notice about non-compliance and an opportunity to put it right? One of the Committee’s difficulties is that we do not know, because we have not been given any examples, what non-compliance might be, how quickly it might occur and how difficult it would be...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c49
House
House of Lords

I am a member of the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee and I wish to ask the Minister a rather technical question. The committee’s report on the Banking Bill was published on 18 December. I think it would be normal for it to expect a written reply but, so...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2009
Reference
706 c1591
House
House of Lords

Does there not come a point when the attempt to get two belts and three pairs of braces is going too far? If, for example, this clause did not exist and the Treasury were to do something needing to be done at speed—I think we all accept that time will...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2009
Reference
706 c1600
House
House of Lords

It may appear to the noble Lord, Lord Newby, to be a bizarre way to proceed, but it probably will happen anyway. Nothing that anyone can do will make it certain that every possibility has been thought of. There may be challenges to some of the things that have been...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2009
Reference
706 c1601
House
House of Lords