Skip to main content

1-20 of 70 results for subject:Location

Member X
Maria Eagle

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Eagle, Maria (70)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether his Department has made an assessment of the merits of potential locations for the establishment of new domestic weapons manufacturing facilities.

Asked by
Edward Morello (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 April 2025
Reference
46583
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many Joint Office Areas are operational in the United Kingdom.

Asked by
James Cartlidge (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 March 2025
Reference
36715
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to page 18 of the Defence Equipment and Support Annual Report and Accounts 2022-23, whether a decision has been made on the location of the two net zero pilot sites.

Asked by
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 January 2024
Reference
10390
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many civil servants in the National Shipbuilding Office are based in (a) London, (b) Edinburgh and (c) elsewhere.

Asked by
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2023
Reference
4810
House
House of Commons

Second reading debate. Amendment negatived on division (37 to 325). Main question agreed to on division (330 to 27). Programme motion on committal, proceedings in Public Bill Committee, consideration and third reading and other proceedings, agreed to on question. Money resolution agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord McLoughlin
Answering member
Maria Eagle
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on bills
Date
26 June 2013
Reference
565 cc335-416
House
House of Commons

Britain’s railways face a major capacity challenge in the years to come. That was why, when we were in government, Labour proposed Britain’s first new north-south rail line for more than 100 years. We remain convinced that the project is essential, as is completing the wider rebuilding of our rail...

Member
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2013
Reference
565 cc347-8
House
House of Commons

I would not agree with that, except in the narrow sense that the project is being taken forward by a Conservative-led Government at present. The Secretary of State and I understand that, on both sides of the House, not everybody is in favour of the project. The genuine concerns that...

Member
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2013
Reference
565 cc348-9
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman raises a legitimate concern, which was probably not helped by the Secretary of State’s predecessor, the right hon. Member for Runnymede and Weybridge (Mr Hammond), referring to HS2 as “a rich man’s toy”. Consideration of pricing arrangements will help to alleviate some of those concerns.

Member
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2013
Reference
565 c349
House
House of Commons

I will give way once I have answered the hon. Member for Dudley South (Chris Kelly).

The Opposition believe strongly that the north-south rail line will be a properly integrated part of our entire rail network. It should not be seen as separate from it. That also goes for pricing and...

Member
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2013
Reference
565 c349
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a good point and I agree with him.

Member
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2013
Reference
565 c349
House
House of Commons

My goodness, I find myself in total agreement with the hon. Gentleman.

Despite the importance of this project, there has been a real lack of drive from Ministers—I am not necessarily talking about the Secretary of State—in taking the decisions and delivering the action needed to make it a reality. The...

Member
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2013
Reference
565 c350
House
House of Commons

It is starting to worry me, when I contemplate my political future, that the average length across the parties of Secretaries of State for Transport appears to be somewhat on the short side. I hope that the right hon. Gentleman, while his Government are still in office, and I can...

Member
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2013
Reference
565 c350
House
House of Commons

I will make a little progress and then give way to the hon. Gentleman.

The fact is that it is only now, four years on from Lord Adonis’s initial action, that the Government are introducing the legislation required to enable money to be spent in advance of construction. The legislation needed...

Member
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2013
Reference
565 cc350-1
House
House of Commons

We cannot get any further north than Leeds and Manchester until we have got to Leeds and Manchester. That is a constraint, and I hear what the hon. Gentleman says.

Member
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2013
Reference
565 c351
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is speaking in hope rather than expectation. I know his own personal concern about the scheme and I understand his point, but I can be clear with the House that Labour supports getting on with building this north-south line.

Member
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2013
Reference
565 c351
House
House of Commons

It is fair to say that there are concerns about connectivity and what is happening at the southern end, but it is also fair to say that the Government of the day must decide. It is reasonable for the Opposition to raise issues, but, with projects over multiple Parliaments, we...

Member
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2013
Reference
565 c351
House
House of Commons

I will do, and then I would like to make a little progress.

Member
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2013
Reference
565 c352
House
House of Commons

I understand my hon. Friend’s point, and the one I made in response to the earlier intervention was simply that we had to get to Leeds and Manchester before we could go further. Work is going on—led by the Department, I think—looking at the prospects for further phases, if one...

Member
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2013
Reference
565 cc352-5
House
House of Commons

I do not accept the hon. Gentleman’s premise that there will be no benefit to Scotland before the high-speed rail line gets there at some time in the future. It is clear that it will benefit from the project.

Member
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2013
Reference
565 c354
House
House of Commons

I have a great deal of sympathy for the hon. Gentleman’s point. It makes no sense to me at all that passengers from the south-east should have to change trains in north London to reach towns and cities in the midlands, the north and up to Scotland. We do not...

Member
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2013
Reference
565 c354
House
House of Commons