Skip to main content

1-20 of 24 results for subject:Numeracy

Member X
Lord De Mauley

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
De Mauley, Lord (24)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, we acknowledge the enormous efforts of the noble Lord, Lord Young, the noble Baroness, Lady Morgan, and their Bill team in taking on board the concerns and arguments which came from all parts of the Chamber in Committee. It is a testament to the hard work of all...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c17-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I did not hear the Minister answer my question about what would happen if an apprentice could not find an employment contract at the end of his six-month period.

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c23
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in Committee, we discussed the role of sector skills councils in some depth. We on these Benches believed, and still believe, that there was a place for the sector skills councils in the Bill. We agreed with the noble Baroness, Lady Sharp, on this matter. We believe it...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c40-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are grateful to the Minister and his team for clarifying the ambiguities present in Clause 86. The many technical and drafting amendments being made at this late stage pay tribute to the dedication of the teams that have redrafted them, and also to the thorough and effective...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c50
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we welcome the Government's amendments. On our second day in Committee, my noble friend Lady Perry commented that, ""11 noble Lords have put their names to amendments that in one way or another ask that Clause 35 repeat the requirement that information about apprenticeships should be given to...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c43-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we welcome the amendment tabled by the noble Baroness, Lady Garden, which would mean that an employer who already has documented annual appraisals that include the discussion of training needs will fulfil their obligations under the clauses on the right to request time to train. We tabled similar...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c47
House
House of Lords

Well, my Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend Lady Perry for her words of support and to the noble Baroness, Lady Howe. I also thank the noble Baroness, Lady Sharp, for her sympathy and all noble Lords for their arguments in favour of the amendment. I agree with...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c63
House
House of Lords

My Lords, our Amendment 39 seeks to address a concern raised by the Association of Colleges. It is worried about the powers contained in Clause 44, which allow local authorities the power to direct further education colleges to accept particular—that is, specified—students within a local authority’s area. The Association of...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c59-60
House
House of Lords

39: Clause 44, page 26, line 25, at end insert— "( ) In deciding whether to require a particular institution to provide education to a particular individual under subsection (2) a local education authority in England must first consult with the governing body of the said institution."

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c59
House
House of Lords

My Lords, several of the government amendments in this group are designed to respond to our amendment tabled in Committee, now Clause 49, which asked that a reading assessment be carried out on those subject to youth detention. The Minister has brought forward a new amendment to replace ours. Barring...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c73-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this group of amendments responds mainly to concerns expressed by the noble Baroness, Lady Sharp, in particular, and by others around the Chamber in Committee. We on these Benches object to the Young People’s Learning Agency on a more fundamental level, as we have said before. We are...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c89-90
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are glad to welcome the government amendments which demonstrate that they have taken several, indeed quite a number, of the Committee’s concerns on board. We remain dissatisfied with much of the Bill, as those who have been present throughout will be aware, but we are grateful for...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c106-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Sharp, for her expression of sympathy for our central point in the debate. I think she said that she had not put her name to the clause stand-part Motion, but I am delighted to say that my version of the...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
713 c280
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is one in a series of probing amendments designed to elicit from the Minister the reason why the chief executive of skills funding has been enshrined in legislation, but the Skills Funding Agency as an organisation has not. We simply want to understand the Government’s reasoning why,...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
713 c274-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, while I agreed with the Minister when he said on the previous group that resources are finite and that a balance has to be struck, his words would have somewhat more force if, when speaking on an earlier group today, he had not boasted of how much money...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
713 c314
House
House of Lords

Amendment 175A 175A: Clause 81, page 54, line 30, at end insert— "( ) The Chief Executive must have regard to the provision of appropriate facilities which are suitable to the needs of the young person for whom apprenticeship training is provided."

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
713 c300
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will be as brief as I can on Amendment 175A, as its intention is pretty clear. The Bill says that the chief executive of skills funding may secure that suitable training should include the provision of facilities that take into account the special needs of the apprentice,...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
713 c300-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Low, for his contribution. His point about putting information on the internet not in itself being enough is well taken. I am also grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Howe, for her support. I thank the Minister for his response. I will...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
713 c304
House
House of Lords

My Lords, to be brief I will address only our Amendment 188A, which has been tabled in response to a concern expressed by the British Chambers of Commerce that Clause 85(3)(b) restricts the ability of people to reskill at the same level, for example in a new trade, or at...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
713 c306-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Eccles for his characteristically detailed scrutiny of the Bill. It is quite clear, as he said, that the Secretary of State should not have the power to direct the chief executive of skills funding on every aspect of the day-to-day management and...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
713 c281
House
House of Lords