Skip to main content

1-20 of 60 results for subject:Liability

Member X
Lord De Mauley

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
De Mauley, Lord (60)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, this is a report, of course to Parliament, and in particular to the House of Lords. If a Member of the Committee which prepared it is permitted to say this, it has been produced with considerable skill and care. If I may be forgiven for saying so, it...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2017
Reference
782 cc1136-7
House
House of Lords

My Right Hon Friend the Secretary of State (Owen Paterson) has today made the following statement.

I wish to update the house on progress on the Thames Tideway Tunnel since the Written Ministerial Statement made on 3 November 2011 by my hon. Friend the then Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Richard Benyon)....

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written statements
Date
5 June 2014
Reference
754 cc20-4WS
House
House of Lords

Draft Pneumoconiosis etc. (Workers' Compensation) (Payment of Claims) (Amendment) Regulations 2012. Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Debated with draft Mesothelioma Lump Sum Payments (Conditions and Amounts) (Amendment) Regulations 2012. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room.

Lead member
Lord De Mauley
Answering member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
13 March 2012
Reference
736 c19-32GC
House
House of Lords

I shall have to write but will do so as quickly as I can. As regards any other questions raised by noble Lords, I will write what is becoming an expanding letter. I thank all noble Lords who have participated. As I hope I have emphasised, the Government recognise that...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2012
Reference
736 c31-2GC
House
House of Lords

It is distinctly possible but I am not sure that I can do it now. The noble Baroness, Lady Donaghy, asked what can be done to improve the public profile of these diseases and she made an important point. Building on the success of the hidden killer campaign, which targeted...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2012
Reference
736 c31GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on behalf of my noble friend, Lord Freud, I will also speak to the draft Mesothelioma Lump Sum Payments (Conditions and Amounts) (Amendment) Regulations 2012. It is a requirement that I confirm to the Committee that these provisions are compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, and...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2012
Reference
736 c19-20GC
House
House of Lords

That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Pneumoconiosis etc. (Workers' Compensation) (Payment of Claims) (Amendment) Regulations 2012. Relevant document: 41st Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2012
Reference
736 c19GC
House
House of Lords

Noble Lords will know that improved health and safety procedures have now both restricted the use of asbestos and provided a safer environment for its handling. However, we are all aware of the legacy created by the common use of asbestos before its effects on people's health were fully understood....

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2012
Reference
736 c20-2GC
House
House of Lords

I shall have to get back to the noble Lord on that. I appreciate that we are on a rather tight timetable and will do what I can. He asked about the cost of both schemes for next year and I can give him a figure of £53.1 million.

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2012
Reference
736 c31GC
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I can start by thanking all noble Lords who have participated in this brief debate for the sensitive way in which they have done it. As we have discussed, we are talking about some very terrible diseases and these things need to be approached in this way. A large...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2012
Reference
736 c28-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I have made clear, there is an issue about the availability of resources. We think it is very important that they are targeted principally on sufferers of the disease, but we recognise the plight of dependants. That is why, under the previous Government, dependants' amounts were increased...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2012
Reference
736 c29-30GC
House
House of Lords

I may be able to come to that in a moment. The noble Lord asked about the HSE charging regime. Unfortunately, I am not able to answer him now but I will write with that information. He asked about our plans for Workers' Memorial Day. Ministers are considering what official...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2012
Reference
736 c30GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for that intervention. I agree with him and I should like it to go on the record that I think it is a good thing that such a day is marked in an appropriate way. As regards his comments about what is going on in...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2012
Reference
736 c30-1GC
House
House of Lords

He did.

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2012
Reference
734 c1584
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I quite agree with my noble friend. We must be alive to the risks that the current uncertainty poses because of financial-sector linkages well beyond the euro area. The UK’s support for the €60 billion euro element of the package represents a sensible position that strikes a balance between UK support and the need for the euro area to take the lead in resolving these problems.
Answered by
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 June 2010
Reference
719 c594
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I quite agree with the noble Lord.
Answered by
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 June 2010
Reference
719 c594-5
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I am not in a position to answer a hypothetical question today.
Answered by
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 June 2010
Reference
719 c594
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the €60 billion euro element of the total €500 billion package is available in the existing EU budget, without a change in legislation, for any member state to drawn on. It is not confined to the euro area. While we declined to participate in the €440 billion element, we cannot and should not simply walk away. A strong and stable euro is in the United Kingdom’s national interest. More than 40 per cent of our exports are to the euro area, and I am sure the noble Lord would agree that it would be unwise to jeopardise that.
Answered by
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 June 2010
Reference
719 c595
House
House of Lords
My Lords, these are early days. Several countries have announced new packages of fiscal recovery measures in recent weeks. I am sure that my noble friend will agree that it would be inappropriate for me to comment on individual member states or to speculate on what might or might not happen.
Answered by
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 June 2010
Reference
719 c595
House
House of Lords
I cannot disagree with the noble Lord.
Answered by
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 June 2010
Reference
719 c595
House
House of Lords