Skip to main content

1-20 of 93 results for subject:Copyright

Member X
Lord De Mauley

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
De Mauley, Lord (93)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what measures they are taking to safeguard the United Kingdom’s natural seed supply from modification and copyrighting by major seed companies so that non-genetically modified seeds are readily available to farmers, horticulturalists and gardeners.[HL4796]

Asked by
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2014
Reference
HL4796; 752 c71WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in our previous debate on this clause, the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, optimistically stated that we would have to wait until Report for further enlightenment on the Government’s spectrum policy. I am not sure what he was expecting, but while we have been waiting there has been a...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c21
House
House of Lords

My Lords, our Amendment 148 in this group addresses much the same point as those of the noble Baroness, Lady Howe. They all seek to clarify the division of responsibility over video work, and raise a concern that the BBFC classification will not be the one by which the product...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c28
House
House of Lords

139: Clause 30, page 36, line 35, at end insert ", and ( ) the establishment of a combined electronic programme guide for analogue and digital stations"

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c12
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am moving this amendment to pick up on a point that the Government made earlier in the Bill’s progress in response to a debate that we had on the future of FM radio. We were reassured by comments made by the Minister in Committee that FM radio...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c12
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Fowler and to the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for their supportive words and I agree with what they say. In explaining my amendment, I acknowledged that the Government might have alternative means. Although I am not entirely sure that the...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c14
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have tabled Amendment 150 simply to seek clarification of a response that the Minister gave in Committee. His argument against consumer advice being required on every video work appeared to rest on the burden that such a requirement would place on the industry. While I yield to...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c35
House
House of Lords

150: Schedule 1, page 58, line 25, after "(3)" insert "and insert— "(2) Regulations under this section may require content advice issued with the classification certificate by the designated authority to be shown in a manner so specified.""

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c35
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Howe, for her support and for the points that she made in support of mine. I thank the Minister for his helpful response, which I will consider carefully, even if he does not go quite so far as I would like. However,...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c37
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join other noble Lords in thanking the Minister for bringing forward these amendments. He apologised for taking so long in doing so, but I thought that he was commendably brief. The amendments represent a considerable improvement on how this Bill was previously drafted. Although many critical details...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c39-40
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we, likewise, support Amendment 143A. There is now widespread acknowledgement that the contract rights renewal regime has served its purpose. As the noble Baroness, Lady Bonham-Carter, said, internet search-engine advertising has grown dramatically and that, together with the multitude of digital channels now available, means that ITV is...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c17-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Bridgeman for returning to this important issue again. Our Committee discussions were cut rather short on these sorts of matters because of time constraints and, judging by the sudden increase in the number of noble Lords in the Chamber—which I regret, I...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c61
House
House of Lords

This amendment is again intended to impose the same level of transparency on Section 116B as the Government have conceded for the orphan works register. How is a copyright owner to know that his work has been licensed out without his express permission if there is not a clear and...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c46
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his helpful explanation and, in light of it, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 155D withdrawn. Amendments 156 to 166 Moved by

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c46-7
House
House of Lords

155D: Clause 42, page 50, line 7, at end insert— "( ) The regulations must require all licensed bodies to publish and maintain a register of all works for which they are granting licences in respect of works in which the copyright is not owned by the body or a...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c46
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his response. I agree with much of what he said and I look forward to the consultation. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 155C withdrawn. Amendment 155D Moved by

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c45-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend Lord Bridgeman raises important points, and I entirely agree with his amendments. Amendments 153A and 155B merely set out what the Minister has already promised. I hope they will be accepted in principle if not in the precise wording. I also agree with the principle...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c43
House
House of Lords

155C: Clause 42, page 50, line 7, at end insert— "(2A) Before granting any licence in respect of works in which copyright is not owned by the body or a person on whose behalf the body acts, the relevant licensing body must publish guidelines on how to exclude a work...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c45
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have already had a useful debate with a gratifying number of government amendments about the safeguards necessary for an effective orphan works scheme. It is unfortunate that we do not have a similar number of government amendments to welcome in relation to collective licensing. Amendment 155C is...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c45
House
House of Lords

My Lords, like the noble Baroness, Lady Howe, I thank the Minister for this group of amendments and for working with the relevant group of stakeholders and us to address our concerns. I would have preferred as a general principle to have seen the loophole closed in primary legislation, but...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
718 c24
House
House of Lords