Skip to main content

1-20 of 74 results for subject:Imports

Member X
Lord Davies of Oldham

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Davies of Oldham, Lord (74)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I join colleagues in congratulating the noble Baroness, Lady McIntosh, both on securing the debate and on producing such a challenging and feisty speech to open it. I had worried that we might be revolving around some narrow technicalities with regard to the exchange rate, but she set...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2016
Reference
776 cc1568-1572
House
House of Lords

Draft Renewable Transport Fuel Obligations (Amendment) Order 2011 (SI 2011/2937). Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room.

Lead member
Earl Attlee
Answering member
Lord Davies of Oldham
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
5 December 2011
Reference
733 c147-66GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I could not put it better myself—in fact, I did not put it better myself and I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Teverson, for pointing that out to the Committee. The Minister must recognise that investor confidence in the industry is low. One plant has effectively...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2011
Reference
733 c160GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been a fascinating debate. The Minister has quite enough on his plate in terms of issues to tackle without me adding a great deal to his burden. I have some sympathy for him; he is well aware of the fact that the Merits Committee of the...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2011
Reference
733 c159-60GC
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the Minister’s response to his noble friend’s original Question seemed somewhat complacent in respect of the charge sheet of problems associated with this issue. He implied that things are improving, but the noble Lord, Lord Newby, expressed doubt about whether things are improving. I think that the whole House should be doubtful. With online sales increasing at their current levels and with this trade being very much a matter of online sales, it would be very surprising indeed if it was significantly decreasing. Would it not therefore behove the Minister to indicate that the Government intend to act in this area? If it is not an abuse of taxation—if it is not a scam—then it is certainly very close to being an avoidance of tax which we ought to put an end to.
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 March 2011
Reference
725 c920-1
House
House of Lords

Lords question for short debate on what action they are taking to tackle the causes of the long-term decline of the British pig industry.

Lead member
Lord Palmer
Answering member
Lord Davies of Oldham
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
6 April 2010
Reference
718 c1452-66
House
House of Lords

If the noble Lord had paid close attention to our position, I have identified the steps by which we have moved towards establishing the issue of food labelling. He will know that this is part of a European perspective: the whole issue about this industry is that we cannot look...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2010
Reference
718 c1464-6
House
House of Lords

The key issue is the quality of the work being done, and the progress that has been made by the task force. There is no doubt that it has achieved a great deal during its year. The task force agreed a number of measures that commend themselves to the House,...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2010
Reference
718 c1463
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have participated in this debate, particularly the noble Lord, Lord Palmer, for securing it and introducing it in such a clear and forthright manner. I recognise the points that he made in his opening contribution. Everyone has declared an interest...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2010
Reference
718 c1461-2
House
House of Lords

Yes, but labelling is only part of this. We need the totality of the position endorsed. Certainly there is no point in talking about labelling unless you have a clear idea of how supermarkets are going to go about their job. The noble Lord, Lord Livsey, asked about the supermarket...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2010
Reference
718 c1463-4
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the health strategy and the Government’s tightening up of border controls have their effect in reducing smuggling. I sought to indicate to the House that there is a significant drop in the amount of cigarettes smuggled into the country. Nevertheless, the House will know that cigarettes are one of the easier commodities to smuggle and it is still done on an unacceptable scale. We are pursuing the most strenuous measures to get the figures down further.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2010
Reference
718 c336
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the figure is 3,200 cigarettes over 160 days. A rapid calculation will indicate that that is 20 a day. So for personal use you are allowed to bring in 20 cigarettes a day for six months.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2010
Reference
718 c335
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the Question was about cigarettes. Hand-rolling tobacco is marginal in comparison to the position with cigarettes. I regret to say that I do not have a figure for hand-rolling tobacco, but I think I can assure the noble Lord—I shall write to him with the specifics—that the problem with regard to smuggling relates to cigarettes.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2010
Reference
718 c336
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the figure offered for the personal use of cigarettes is the one which I quoted. It seems to be a reasonable figure given the difficulty of reducing cigarette consumption on the part of people who are addicted to tobacco, and some fairness has to be applied there. We are not reducing that figure, but the reduction of legitimate revenue take on cigarettes is a reflection of the general policy of persuading the nation to smoke less.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2010
Reference
718 c337
House
House of Lords
On the contrary, my Lords. I accept of course the noble Baroness’s congratulations on the Government having hit the target thus far. I assure her that the success is based on a strategy which is clearly working. We are intensifying that strategy.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2010
Reference
718 c336
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I thought that question might arise. It is a calculation. Of course, it has to be an estimate. As with everything to do with aspects of crime proceeds, there is an element of estimate. It is the difference between the take the Revenue legitimately gets from cigarettes on which the duty has been paid and the figures from household surveys of cigarette consumption. It is the distinction between those two points.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2010
Reference
718 c336
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the revenue lost due to smuggling in 2007-08 was £1.5 billion. This is down from £2.7 billion in 2000-01. The revenue lost due to imports for personal use is £0.9 billion, of which £0.6 billion came from the European Union in 2007-08, due to lower retail prices in the EU. In January 2010 the UK had an average tax rate, including VAT, as a proportion of the retail price in the EU.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2010
Reference
718 c335
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the response from Brussels is that border controls on imports are the responsibility of the United Kingdom. As I have indicated, we have had a marked improvement in the reduction of smuggling over the past 10 years. However, as my noble friend will readily appreciate, the higher we price cigarettes for the wholly commendable and proper reasons of improving the nation’s health and seeking to reduce consumption, the greater the incentive for smugglers.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 March 2010
Reference
718 c335
House
House of Lords
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how much tax revenue from cigarettes they estimate they have lost due to (a) smuggling, and (b) imports from the European Union for personal use.
Asked by
Lord Dubs (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 2010
Reference
718 c335
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to require all those importing equine animals from Romania, Italy and other high risk areas to produce a negative Coggins test alongside the compulsory horse passports for those animals.

Asked by
Lord Dear (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
2307; 717 c367-8WA
House
House of Lords