Skip to main content

1-20 of 57 results for subject:"Disclosure of information"

Member X
Lord Davies of Oldham
Subject X
Stocks and shares

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Davies of Oldham, Lord (57)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Stocks and shares (57)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

7: Clause 2, page 2, line 7, at end insert— ““( ) In making a designation under subsection (1), the Treasury shall have regard to the United Kingdom’s international obligations in respect of— (a) the prevention of terrorism; and (b) the humanitarian needs of the person affected by designation.””

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 October 2010
Reference
721 c152
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also to the amendments grouped with Amendment 7, including Amendment 51, which is linked to it. I also note that our new Clause 10 is included; it is there in a most helpful frame from the Opposition towards the Government, and I hope that the...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 October 2010
Reference
721 c152-3
House
House of Lords

With the Minister’s categorical reassurance buttressing the comments of the noble Baroness, Lady Noakes, which I also accept as an important contribution, I am happy to withdraw the latter amendment in due course. We are all aware how significant this legislation is and how judicial review and challenge can occur....

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 October 2010
Reference
721 c156
House
House of Lords

As I indicated, the FSA has not finished its consultation on this issue. This is a salient point that needs to be settled. I can give some reassurance that the points made by the noble Baroness today are important and need to be given serious consideration. Having acknowledged that the...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c36
House
House of Lords

I second the noble Baroness’s vote of thanks to all those who have served the Committee so well through its proceedings. I pay tribute, of course, to the noble Baroness. All in the House will recognise that she has borne the majority of the heat and burden of every day...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c167
House
House of Lords

We set up the valuer in an independent role to carry out this important exercise. In making that arrangement, we indicated that if he found that he had inadequate powers to fulfil the task, he could quite reasonably come back to us. He, in turn, identified where he was having...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c96-7
House
House of Lords

I think that we are. I do not see why we should not be.

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c97
House
House of Lords

I was quite specific. I indicated the valuer’s problems. He said that he was unable to get the information that he required. It is understandable that those who were interested in bidding for Northern Rock might not be too enthusiastic about disclosing information involving them. I hasten to add that...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c96
House
House of Lords

Amendment 174H 174H: After Clause 227, insert the following new Clause— ““Banking (Special Provisions) Act 2008: Compensation: valuer Without prejudice to the generality of section 12 of the Banking (Special Provisions) Act 2008 (consequential and supplementary provision), it is declared that the power under section 9 of that Act to...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c94
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness suggested on the previous amendment that I was subject to bureaucratic priorities; on this one, I share her objective, which is not bureaucracy, but openness. I therefore have some sympathy with her amendment. It is not necessary to place a statutory requirement on the Bank of England...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c130
House
House of Lords

I do not accept that point. The Bill enhances the responsibility of the Bank of England in this crucial area. The Bank is provided with structures which fulfil its obligations. It has to report on the role which it plays, particularly its key obligations. It will report on these matters...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c131
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to my noble friend for that insight. I fully appreciate that he brings academic detachment in supreme measure to his considerations when working in this context. However I also recognise, as does he, that it is possible for us to look for people who are able to...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c127
House
House of Lords

I propose to deal first with the more difficult amendment—Amendment 195, with which we disagree—but hope to give the noble Baroness a better response to Amendment 194. In appointing court members the Government will seek to ensure that the appropriate mix of skills are available to the court as a...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c126-7
House
House of Lords

We thought that the two provisions were relatively uncontroversial but the noble Baroness wants me to comment on the two subsections. The first, subsection (4), allows the Financial Stability Committee to delegate any of its functions to two or more of its members, other than the Treasury representative and co-opted...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c128-9
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to noble Lords who spoke on this amendment. With respect to the principles behind Clause 185, we do not think that the Bank of England needs to be put under a specific requirement to consult. The Bank intends to adopt the internationally recognised principles developed by the...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c39-41
House
House of Lords

I hope that I can be a little more helpful to the noble Lord, because he is on to an important point. I tried to emphasise that the FSA publishes guidance on the level of penalties, but the FSA’s powers are unlimited in the primary legislation governing it, the FSMA.

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c49
House
House of Lords

I am delighted to do my best to resolve the noble Baroness’s anxieties yet again. However, I do not think that her anxieties in this regard are well founded. While the Bank of England will be the sole regulator of recognised inter-bank payment systems, the FSA will continue to be...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c45-6
House
House of Lords

To answer straightforwardly, yes, they will be cost-related.

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c52
House
House of Lords

I am grateful that the noble Baroness recognises that the Bank does not currently intend to charge fees for its routine oversight of payment systems. That practice will continue. This clause future-proofs the legislation against the potential eventuality that the Bank’s overall funding model might change. It shows that the...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c51
House
House of Lords

I appreciate the concerns expressed by the noble Baroness but hope I am able to persuade her that Amendment 159A and Amendment 159B would be unnecessary. As I hope I made clear in my last response, we have no intention of introducing pre-funding. It is not the time for doing...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
707 c17-8
House
House of Lords